User talk:Nerfari

Thanks ClueBot next time I see a racist attack page I'll know not to replace the entire content with something else. Nerfari (talk) 21:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi - I have undone Cluebot and restored the {{db-atk}} tag. Cluebot is an anti-vandal system that automatically reverts large deletions. I am a bit surprised that it jumped on such a relatively small one as this. I shouldn't worry about it, because when you have a bit more of an editing record you will automatically get onto a White List of people it trusts. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Addition - you did absolutely the right thing to blank out an attack page. I tend to add the word "blanked" to show the attacker what's happened if he looks, but that's according to taste. One tip which saves a few keystrokes: {{db-atk}} works just as well. The next thing to do (which you probably would have done but for Cluebot) is to copy the warning notice from the template displayed on the page to the author's talk page. It's depressing how many attack pages there are, and it's a good and useful thing to zap them fast. Happy hunting! JohnCD (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Monkey jacket constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Jackol  ๏̯͡๏﴿ 21:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC) NOW WHAT???? Nerfari (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I bet this is another one of those things that only happen because I have a low edit count. Someone tell me how many I need before you stop treating me like a 6-year old. Nerfari (talk) 21:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think it has anything to do with your edit count, but who knows? You might ask why he did it. You can delete anything on your talk page (but you might want to, at least in the future, archive, see

talk) 21:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I knew it, it WAS a bot or something. Wikipedia:Huggle. Nerfari (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• No, Huggle isn't actually a bot, it's an automated tool which makes it easy to do things fast, but also rather easy to press the wrong button, which I guess is what happened here. I think your edit was thoroughly constructive, and I have asked Jackol why he reverted it and warned you. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added you to the whitelist so your edits shouldn't be appearing to Hugglers like myself anymore. treelo _radda 23:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nerfari. You have new messages at Jackol's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Instead of hassling me, why don't you go take a look at what happened to User:C3: Colorectal Cancer Coalition. OK they created a promotional article and I tagged it for deletion but they also said they were willing to adjust the article. I thought perhaps I could help because there do seem to be some reliable sources about it, but when I get back I find that they've been indefinitely blocked for "spam", which seems pretty fricken' brutal if you ask me. Nerfari (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nerfari for your comments.

talk) 13:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks it seems to work. I'll try to put it to good use. Nerfari (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Papercutbiology♫ (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Papercutbiology♫ (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk) 01:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

List of words having different meanings in Spain and Latin America

The article

Articles for deletion

process.

As you were involved in the previous deletion discussion for this article, I thought I would inform you of the new discussion;

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of words having different meanings in Spain and Latin America (2nd nomination)

Thanks,  Chzz  ►  14:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

VICTORIAN WORKING CLASS LEISURE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect VICTORIAN WORKING CLASS LEISURE. Since you had some involvement with the VICTORIAN WORKING CLASS LEISURE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 06:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]