User talk:NiciVampireHeart/Archive 30

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey there. Thanks for the message concerning my editing of match times, specifically from WrestleMania IV. Recently in my free time I began watching the WrestleMania events, starting with the first one. I often refer to Wikipedia when doing so if I don't know much about someone in a match. When it came to the match at WM IV between the tag teams Demolition and Strikforce, I noticed the match time listed on Wikipedia and realized the match was not that long. I went back and timed the match, and from opening bell to ending bell it went 8:01. It's listed on here that it went 12:33. Most of the match times that I've actually timed were listed on here less than 10 seconds of what I timed, so that doesn't make much of a difference, but saying one match was four and a half minutes longer than it actually was is a little much. I realize it will probably be a problem that there's no cited source for that, just what I say, so I won't make any more changes for now. I would think, however, that a big wrestling fan (who also makes a living as a sports statistician, so works with numbers and times year-round) manually timing a match would cause a more accurate result than listing match times verbatim off a website. I am certain that if you went and watched those matches and timed them yourself, you would also find some of the listed times incorrect.

(Zittypancake (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC))

All new wrestling events are being doing with 85% letter size, if you want, watch all the new wrestling events. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJMintOne (talk • contribs) 09:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yuji Yasuraoka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks,

Fixed. NiciVampireHeart 15:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed between 12-14 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the initial messages I sent out went to only WikiProject members and users that had over 15 reviews). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. Now, one of the most important criteria is that you have at least 15 independent reviews. If you are reading this, you are likely 3 (or less) reviews short, so if you review another couple nominations, you can become a recruiter! If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". NOTE: If you are interested in becoming a recruiter but do not meet the 15 review requirement, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters and put your status as "Not Available" until you have reviewed enough nominations. Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

I've addressed all of your comments, thanks for the review! Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 21:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop removing the career description from TJP wiki. It is not only accurate and correctly cited from an interview covering not only the extent of the description but the validity of it. It also is a very major career trait for him. Many other celebrities, musicians, actors, wrestlers, have said "puff" in their career descriptions. IE Bryan Danielson being referred to as the best wrestler in the world. TJ deserves the same credit especially when confirmed with proper source, which was added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.64.126 (talk) 22:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know that there are many, many incorrect times on WWE PPV articles, like the one that I changed that you reverted back, as well as the steel cage match between Edge and Christan at Rebellion 2001 (as an example- there is no way that match went 21 minutes, I own the DVD). Zonafan39 (talk) 17:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bravado Brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenneth Cameron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I Corrected it numerous times and still people chose too change it once again the Championship was won April 10, 2013 not March 2, 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMichael22 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

The citation was her twitter page. They are both verified on twitter. But it's not big deal to me, was just adding information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.111.126.20 (talk) 16:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey,

I understand that citations are required. However, the WWE did not release an official statement of "Crawl (Underscore)" being a theme song of the 2008 Armageddon Pay-Per-view. However, the song they stated would be the theme song (Guns n Roses' "Chinese Democracy") was never actually played - instead, during the intro graphic, pyrotechnics and throughout the night, "Crawl (Underscore)" was played.

I simply listed this as a second theme song as it took the place of Chinese Democracy on the night. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.221.195 (talk) 11:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elimination Chamber (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

This IP 173.171.83.163 is undoing every thing I edit without explanation on the List of current Bellator fighters page and I would like to know what I can do about it JMichael22 (talk) 20:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

hello nicivampireheart, i got your messages and i don't agree because whoever put the timings on the pay per views are wrong so i change them and make them right so i don't see what im doing wrong and buy the way don't threaten me because if you threaten me on Wikipedia i will report you so if we can make a deal that i continue to do timings of matches and plus it wouldn't say edit source if i was not allowed to do it so please get back to me on this so i can do my timings without and interference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wweaddict12 (talk • contribs) 08:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

It's been a long time, Nici, this is me dropping by to say hello; how you been? :) Also, Happy Late Birthday girl :D I'm doing well just busy with work, I'm finally done with school and I guess it was worth it. Thank you very much for helping out at the James Franco page I appreciate it. I bet IPs wrecked the article that's why someone opened a GAR. Damn IPs. Jeez, Wikipedia has changed a lot, the GAC page is different. I almost forgot how to edit lol Also, we need to stay in contact --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit?--TrixieVanS (talk) 11:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

In the future a simple notation when removing something would be courteous and less time consuming than arbitrary striking something and forcing a waste of time and effort contacting you . — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrixieVanS (talk • contribs) 20:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I agree with you on most of your cleanups on wrestlers pages. But I think that face and heel turns should be mentioned. Message me back pls. Ironcan (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trish Stratus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MNM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, despite my recent edits that you revert, I do respect and like what you do. I admit Kane's section was becoming a clutter and it needed to be fixed, but there are my problems that I have: as I said the whole reason Kane was put in anger management was because he was furious that he lost to Bryan and attacked Josh Matthews, WWE didn't just (even though they would totally do this) put him in anger management just cause all of a sudden they realized after about 16 years that he had problems, no there was a reason behind it. Even though to you it's not notable and maybe to others it is too, but to some it is. And why shouldn't a simple version of how he and Bryan split up be added? Like when you put "In the aftermath of the championship loss, Bryan formed a team with Randy Orton to face the Shield, while Kane was left on his own." That was good, it at least put together the end of their partnership. Also why is that his feuds with Cena and Orton, which have absolutely nothing to do with one another, is merged but everything that has to do with Team Hell No is split? I'm not saying that they need to be one whole paragraph like they were before, but like what I did in my last edit that you reverted, where I merged the formation of and beginning half of their reign and separated their feud with the Shield that led to the loss of the tag titles.

Now, this something in both Kane and Layla's articles, just saying the date and not what show or vice-versa. How is someone who is trying to find out this type of information and want to look up the match say on YouTube when they don't know when it is exactly? Like when you don't say the date of Superstars, when was it? Or just saying 15 October? Is that Raw, SmackDown, Main Event, Superstars, a PPV, a house show? Some people wouldn't know. And Eve Torres, she always was addressed as Eve not simply Torres. Or the feud with Tamina Snuka was barely anything to be called a feud, they were pointless singles matches that WWE couldn't have cared less about, with the same two divas. Also, her "feud" with Tamina was not the reason Layla allied with Kaitlyn, they were somewhat allies in the story with Eve and after that sporadically tagged together, she started accompanying her during her feud with AJ Lee that was actually a feud. Another thing, in my opinion I don't think that her injury should start off a section, oh and "on SmackDown on May 13" why not just say the 13 May episode of SmackDown like it was? Her whole deal with LayCool ended in 2011 and her she was injured immediately then after and was gone for the rest of the year, so I don't believe that should start off a section. And what was wrong with me saying "Layla lost her title match on the 15 October episode of Raw, and again in a three-way match, also involving Kaitlyn, on 28 October at Hell in a Cell."? It was not anymore wordy than what you said, so what is the problem? And I think this is my last point, her Wrestlemania 27 match, why is that not included? I mean it was the probably one of the worst matches I've seen in my opinion and honestly had no business being at Mania, but it was still Wrestle freaking Mania the grandest stage of them all, not some random pay-per-view.

Again, I respect the hell out of you, you are a devoted wrestling fan and a very intelligent woman, but me myself (I admit I am not the smartest and you can ridicule me if you want) have some different ways of seeing things. I just wanted to work out a compromise, if you disagree and I'm sure you will, there isn't much I can do I guess, but just tear me apart about it please. Sorry if I seem like a douche, a crybaby, or whatever you want to call me, but I am too a devoted wrestling fan and have my own opinions. Write me back i you can and again please don't bite my head off if you can. Thanks. Sir Wrestler (talk) 20:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Why did you delete my edit? It has been shown on many social media websites that Orton and JoJo were seen together holding hands in public, which is why I added the information. Maybe you should look before deleting my edit. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheShadowLord54 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)