User talk:NingBing
Welcome!
Hello, NingBing, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to
June 2014
Hello, I'm
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *''By Underground to Kew; Strelitzia Reginae (1926))'' <ref>Wilfrid Rene Wood, [http://www.ltmuseumshop.co.uk/posters/gallery/product/unframed/poster/
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
Wilfrid Wood
Hello. I have started a discussion about the best title for the page at
The "Rene" bit seems useful because of the living artist called "Wilfrid Wood" (www.wilfridwood.com), but I don't care strongly about either the accent or the shortened form of his name, as long as the shortened form does not lead to ambiguity (or broken links). BTW, this is my first time in "talk", so let me know if I'm doing things wrong. NingBing (talk) 12:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Three word budget
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on Three word budget requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
Notability
I wasn't sure if you'd see my response on the help desk page, so I thought I'd post here (and add to it).
For what it's worth, I'm the one who flagged the article for speedy deletion. I did so because it was an obvious candidate - it was a flash-in-the-pan Twitter tag which attracted bugger all mainstream media attention and was completely forgotten about by the next week. It roundly failed even the most basic notability criteria for articles that Wikipedia has. I generally err on the side of including material on Wikipedia, I'm Australian, and I'm a fervent opponent of this budget (and thus agree with you politically) - this was just something that couldn't meet even the lowest possible bar Wikipedia has. I think you totally mean well but you're fundamentally misunderstanding Wikipedia's notability criteria. You can grasp at straws to an extent when you're making notability arguments, but this is waaaay beyond what you can get away with.
To respond to your arguments on the administrator's talk page: It isn't "an emerging new term or phrase". It was a Twitter hashtag fad that lasted for a few days and didn't make much of an impact. Neither is it a significant use of Twitter and hashtags (in Australia): I don't even use Twitter and I can think of a bunch off the top of my head that are far more notable. I think Twitter hashtags generally are something you're going to find will nearly always get deleted, but this one isn't within cooee of the bar to be kept. "Immediate public reaction" to a government decision via Twitter is not vaguely new, and this is neither a new or particularly popular example of it, and "amusing and clever" might be very funny but it doesn't get stuff kept on Wikipedia.
tl;dr Twitter hashtags are almost never going to get seen as notable unless there's a really good reason. I can think of some hilarious ones on my pet causes that have been going for nearly a year, have large-scale worldwide participation in my communities, and have spilled over a bit into the real world, but I'm pretty confident that if I tried writing articles on them - even if I'd cited them to the hilt - they'd be instantly put on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and I'd probably lose the argument.
Wikipedia's coverage of the budget is crap compared to what it could be, and there are better places to spend your time if you're interested in contributing. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC William Ewart Hart was accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
FireflySixtySeven (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Your submission at AfC Joseph Joel Hammond was accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
FireflySixtySeven (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Your submission at Draft:Arthur Herbert Affleck (July 27)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
contributions to Wikipedia!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! NingBing,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Your submission at AfC Arthur Herbert Affleck was accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
j⚛e deckertalk 14:29, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfrid Rene Wood
Hello NingBing. It has been over six months since you last edited your
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfrid Rene Wood}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Chocolatey
Hello NingBing. It has been over six months since you last edited your
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Chocolatey}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Three word budget has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Three word budget (June 1)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Three word budget and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Your draft article, Draft:Three word budget
Hello, NingBing. It has been over six months since you last edited your
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
{{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Chocolatey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chocolatey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolatey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella Velella Talk 11:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Chocolatey for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolatey (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.