User talk:Northamerica1000/Archive 55

This is an interesting article! The images are especially compelling. Thanks for all of your hard work! Royalbroil 14:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Royalbroil: Thanks for the encouragement. Cheers, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Northamerica1000. Two weeks ago you deleted

@

WP:G12. The present version does not appear to have this problem (e.g. [11]). There's a minor hit, but the content is not verbatim per the source, and appears to have been rewritten in one's own words from that source. North America¹⁰⁰⁰

00:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dharmadhyaksha -- Dharmadhyaksha (talk

The article Pancake machine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pancake machine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dharmadhyaksha -- Dharmadhyaksha (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I believe I should have received DYK credit for Meaza Ashenafi. Who do I talk to about this? Thanks!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

@Doug Coldwell: Looks like Dr. Blofeld provided credit on your talk page (diff). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, indeed he did. He took care of the problem. Thanks for reply.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deep-fried butter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Fixed. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for restoring the page. I did it by mistake while editing.
Warm Regards,
Ayush Gupta At Wikipedia (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

On 28 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Queen Elizabeth cake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Queen Elizabeth cake is named after Elizabeth II and is a popular cake in Canada? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Queen Elizabeth cake. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

On 29 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chestnut cake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that chestnut cake may be prepared using flour from ground chestnuts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chestnut cake. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

On 29 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Saving Mes Aynak, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the director of Saving Mes Aynak presented Afghani leaders with a petition signed by 100,000 people in support of the preservation of the 5,000-year-old archaeological site (excavations pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saving Mes Aynak. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I can not gift you a prize lesser than this for your amazing (read delicious) articles, your blitzkrieg response and voluntary efforts at the GA review of Naem and friendliness. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 10:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

• Wow, thanks Sainsf. How nice. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I can not gift you a prize lesser than this for your amazing (read delicious) articles, your blitzkrieg response and voluntary efforts at the GA review of Naem and friendliness. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Talk all words 10:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

• Wow, thanks Sainsf. How nice. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter Volume III, no. 4, March 2016 Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.
Project News Food- and drink-related CfD discussions, Cat meat, New Liquor portal, Recent Good article promotions and Unassessed articles . (more information below) — View by clicking [show] — Many project-related categories are presently listed at Categories for discussion. See the project's Article alerts for more information and links. A discussion regarding cat meat is occurring at Talk:Cat meat § Legality in Canada section. The new liquor related topics. The following food and drink articles have been promoted to Good article -class in 2016: Carrot soup Crab dip English Cuisine Esparza's Grodziskie Lemon Drop Pizza cheese Plum cake Mrs Beeton's Book of Household Management Royal Stag There are presently 3,575 unassessed articles. Additional attention from the project's assessors is necessary and would be appreciated to reduce this backlog. Article alerts — View by clicking [show] — Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Article alerts Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero. Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.	Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project. — View by clicking [show] — 18 new members!CamV8AeonxKar2016Lee788OmotechoLeuven2015Rich FarmbroughChiswick ChapAnna FrodesiakAtsmePrimaPreussenErpertSueDonemOff-shellBogger GunkartaBwtranchDebbiesw The project currently has 100 active members. Some recent food and drink new articles and content: — View by clicking [show] — talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Legacypac (talk · contribs · new pages (80) ) started on 2016-02-26, score: 10 Olive Oil Times (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Janestreet350 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-22, score: 20 Terra Greens Organic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Neetjash (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2016-02-19, score: 10 talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by DinosaursLoveExistence (talk · contribs · new pages (16) ) started on 2016-02-29, score: 10 Club Quilox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Eruditescholar (talk · contribs · new pages (11)) started on 2016-02-29, score: 30 Boston Tea Party (café chain) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by LegereScire (talk · contribs · new pages (3)) started on 2016-02-29, score: 10 Refermentation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rachelskit (talk · contribs · new pages (3) ) started on 2016-02-28, score: 40 Graeme Burns (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Drchriswilliams (talk · contribs · new pages (8)) started on 2016-02-28, score: 10 Alex Brewster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Drchriswilliams (talk · contribs · new pages (8)) started on 2016-02-28, score: 10 List of Georgian wine appellations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Biwom (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2016-02-27, score: 20 Tvishi (wine) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Biwom (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2016-02-27, score: 20 Wok to Walk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Xaosflux (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2016-02-26, score: 10 Pepsi Spire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rowanlovescars (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-26, score: 20 talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Cattus (talk · contribs · new pages (160) ) started on 2016-02-26, score: 10 Royal Dragon Vodka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Onel5969 (talk · contribs · new pages (37)) started on 2016-02-25, score: 10 Arnbitter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Gardar Rurak (talk · contribs · new pages (25)) started on 2016-02-25, score: 10 Brian Petruzzi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by PorridgeJohnson1 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-25, score: 20 2013 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 20 2012 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 2011 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 2010 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 2009 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Kwangkongkul (talk · contribs · new pages (1) ) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 Vazisubani (wine) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Biwom (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 20 Monterebro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Onel5969 (talk · contribs · new pages (37)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 talk · contribs · new pages (1) ) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 More... Past newsletters
Food and drink articles by quality and importance There are currently 34,340 articles attributed to the project, including 10,580 stubs. There are 38 articles at Featured list class. — View by clicking [show] — Article statistics Food and Drink WikiProject article assessment Food and drink articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 13 28 48 FL 2 1 3 FM 139 139 GA 13 24 73 250 5 365 B 54 227 331 581 57 1,250 C 79 388 954 2,712 465 4,598 Start 23 322 1,642 9,827 5 3,788 15,607 Stub 1 26 554 7,822 1 5,041 13,445 List 9 69 108 466 23 272 947 Category 9 1 2 7,565 7,577 Disambig 7 149 156 File 2,999 2,999 Portal 614 614 Project 384 384 Redirect 10 70 534 2,677 3,291 Template 1 946 947 Other 3 188 191 Assessed 179 1,085 3,746 22,233 15,690 9,628 52,561 Unassessed 19 1,935 1,954 Total 179 1,085 3,746 22,252 15,690 11,563 54,515 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 181,561 Ω = 5.14 Assessment log and Guide to Assessment Help on Editing and Sourcing Articles view

– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I reviewed the Aquatic weed harvester article for DYK and thought it rather incomplete. Would you like me to expand it a bit? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I responded at Template:Did you know nominations/Aquatic weed harvester, to keep the conversation in one area. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I apologize for any misunderstanding between us in connection with this article. I have now finished adding to it. I found it difficult to add information on the machinery involved because most of what I found was by firms marketing their products rather than general information. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi NorthA,

Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia. I will be glad if you can serve in the Jury for

@Wikicology: Thanks for the invitation, and I like the writing contest that you have devised. However, I'm going to pass on being one of the judges there. I have taken note of the page you created at Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Nigeria/Writing Contest/Articles suggestions, particularly the red links, for which new articles may be created. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much. The community is proud of you.

t@lk to M£

17:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

@Wikicology: Hey, that's nice. I'm proud of the community and its spirit of writing collaboration, among other things. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

@

collaboration. North America¹⁰⁰⁰

17:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

My pleasure.

t@lk to M£

18:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

• The short answer: I reverted because your edits removed valuable content from the article, and changed it in a manner that is not consistent with what the sources report. For example, it is a style of pizza, but you removed all of that. I'm not sure why you are all of the sudden very interested in this new article I just created today and changing it all around, but please 1) allow time for editors to expand articles before you remove all of the content, and 2) read the sources before removing sourced content. Since you want the article merged, the manner in which you removed a significant portion of the article could be construed as an attempt to further qualify your stance for a merge. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
• I just added another source to the article in re service with prosciutto. These things take time. Please don't be so eager to remove all the content while I'm still working on it. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
• Regarding the notion of having a separate article for
  pepperoni pizza, I actually support this, because there's virtually no content about it in the pizza article that the link redirects to. The pizza article presently simply has a single mention of the word "pepperoni" in the context of toppings (permanent link). See below for the plethora of significant coverage about the topic. This is actually a decent prospect for a standalone article, because it has received significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰
  22:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

• I just added an internal link to pepperoni in the pizza article (diff). It's a start. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
• I am still working on the
  WP:DYK to appear on main page. I have found more sources to expand the article further, and have removed the merge template from the article, because the topic has received enough overall coverage to qualify for a standalone article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰
  22:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Moved to User talk:Potguru

 – North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

• N.b. Replied at the user's talk page, to keep the discussion in one area. My notions are guided by Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and as such, are properly guided. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

cool purple archive trick

hey, ace, come make all these top sections on the talk page read "archived purposed only outcome was speedy deletion voted down"or some such ieTalk:Donald_J_Drumpf#Contested_deletion ..or point me to the tool to DIY. Thanks! --Potguru (talk) 19:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

• I am declining becoming involved in this matter at this time. If you'd like, you can request assistance by copying and pasting {{Help me}} atop a section on your talk page, and post your question below the banner the template creates. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Eugene Delacroix - Liberty Leading the People Hello, Northamerica1000. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement 's weekly selection: People Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Music of Africa • Molecule Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I know that this may not be your area of expertise (or perhaps it is...), but would you mind taking a glance at Wayzata Bay Center? It was an enclosed shopping mall near my place of residence. Very little of the mall's history is included on the internet, but I think the article looks pretty good for all that's out there. Mainly, I want to hear your opinion of whether or not I should nominate it for GA status. I would appreciate it very much, thanks. Carbrera (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

• @Carbrera: I'll respond soon. I'm touching up a few articles I've been working on, after which I'm logging off shortly. Need a bit of time. I have made a few copy edits to the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
• @Carbrera: I have reassessed the article to B-class on the talk page, and added the WikiProject Minnesota template there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey thanks! It's very much appreciated. Carbrera (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

• I think you should nominate the article for GA review. It appears to meet all of the key points of the Good article criteria. One minor matter: I recommend trying to find a better source to replace the PR Newswire one, if such better source is available. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

I nominated it! Thanks, once again for all your help and suggestions. I'll give it a look! Carbrera (talk) 23:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Jamestown Revival

Thanks,

Any idea why the article

@Atsme: As long as the article adheres to a neutral point of view, I'm all right with its existence. The topic has received a great deal of coverage in reliable sources, which is what Wikipedia's content is based upon. Also, a recent AfD discussion about a related topic here closed as a merge into the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

@Northamerica1000: while I appreciate your perspective, I am justifiably concerned over this "trend". I posted to Jimbo's TP and he also believes it warrants discussion, [26]. Where do you think is the best place to begin for community input? Atsme^📞📧 16:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

@

While the episode of the television show could be described as "polemic and politically motivated", the article itself is not. It is written neutrally from what reliable sources report and state. I stand by the notion that as a topic that has received significant coverage in reliable sources, the topic qualifies for an article. Per your opinions above, the possible perception of attempted censorship of this content from Wikipedia per your personal views could also be perceived as being "polemic and politically motivated", particularly if you're a Trump supporter (which I have no idea if you are or not). There's no offense intended toward you here, but this is important to mention to cover all of the bases, because people may question your intentions and motivations. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. Articles like this, regardless of who they are written about (I just happened across this one at one of the noticeboards or in an RfC) are as disconcerting to me as would be any explosion of

Hillary Rodham Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. Do you see what I mean? Allowing one will open the flood gates to forking, not to mention recentism if they're being sourced to media coverage because of the ongoing presidential election - and that is exactly what most of them are because the politicians are fair game right now. I won't bother to show further examples of the other candidates because I think you get my point. Regarding your reference of my intentions, we all have a POV which only becomes problematic when closed minds are involved. Rather than go on about it, I'll just let my user contributions speak for me. If I may, I will also take this opportunity to confirm my position and code of ethics on WP by stating to you now that I leave my biases at login. I attribute my ability for the latter to 30+ years of training and hands-on experience as a publisher/journalist/writer/tv scriptwriter, dating back to a time when unbiased reporting followed a code of ethics and actually meant something; long before political pundits became what we know today as news anchors/commentators. Atsme^📞📧

20:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

@Atsme: Short answer (working on other stuff right now): I tried to word my response delicately above. I didn't mean to imply that you are biased, just that other users could potentially perceive your intentions as biased. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

• Hey Atsme: check out Bernie Sanders' Dank Meme Stash too. I like it, because it's funny. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

• Ha! Hmmm...it appears posts are being censored at that FB page. Regardless, what it represents to me is an open door for WP articles on any "trending" FB page, tweet or blog regardless of GNG & RS guidelines. See the following which is probably more deserving of an article as it actually does have EV, [29]. The Sanders' article results from a FB page with only 350,000 members and the only reason it received any attention is because Sanders is a candidate and folks are having fun with it. It shouldn't be anything more than a short paragraph in his WP campaign article and maybe in an article about memes. I mean seriously, one of the cited sources is the USA Today's section "College - 2016 Election" which is nothing more than a compilation of blogs and tweets from supporters. Where is the cut-off point or is there one? In what direction do articles like this lead us? I fail to see any encyclopedic value in it. I think there's confusion over what is considered "encyclopedic" vs "newsworthy". They are two completely different animals. Comic strips and skits on SNL are funny but each episode doesn't warrant a standalone article. Motion pictures have a tougher time getting a WP article than some of these political skits. I can't help but see them as a challenge to recentism, forking, soapbox, advocacy, GNG, RS, etc. Perhaps it's worthy of mention in an article about memes and the candidate's political campaign with strict adherence to NPOV, but standalone - meh. Sorry to be a party pooper, but I fail to see how these types of articles help build a credible encyclopedia. They'll get hits while "tending" and then they'll be forgotten - pure recentism. I see them as part of what chips away at the very foundation of WP and its long standing encyclopedic value. If the goal is to change WP's direction to accommodate recentism, blogs, tabloidish articles, activism, advocacy, then we've got a good start. I think they fall under the following in WP:GNG: "Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Atsme^📞📧 14:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

WT:POLITICS. North America¹⁰⁰⁰

17:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quite frankly NA1000 - my passion for it ends with my posts to you. 😆 You're a good ear to bend, or I should say a good set of eyes to eyecercise. If the WP servers can handle all the junk articles, so be it. I've graduated beyond "passion" - I'm retired. Atsme^📞📧 19:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Charles Maria Weber

Thanks,