User talk:Nousernamesleft/archive1
Archives |
---|
Archive 1 (December 2006 - January 2008) |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Image tagging for Image:Noteworthy Composer-1.pngThanks for uploading Image:Noteworthy Composer-1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC) Image tagging for Image:Noteworthy Composer-2.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Noteworthy Composer-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Orphaned fair use image (Image:Noteworthy Composer-2.jpg)Thanks for uploading If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Editor reviewThanks for your question at my editor review, I've replied there. Was there a more specific subject you were asking about? (Also, I numbered and de-bolded the question you wrote to match the standard formatting. If you disagree with this change, please feel free to reverse it.) Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 22:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Userpage misformattingThanks for letting me know! That was actually an edit from a bot which appears to be malfunctioning. I've stopped the bot temporarily while the problem is examined. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC) ...One Wikipedian down, a whole lot more to go...Dattebayo321 23:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Ahahahahaha...you're user page sucks even more than my beta user page sucks. Shall I announce your age and stuff to the world? Dattebayo32116:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Tsk Tsk Tsk...you have a very self-centered user page, doncha? Anyways, improve your articles!!!Killer cellos!!! 20:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC) Peter, frankly, you suck. Go look for your own user boxes. I'm still updating mine riiiiiight now... Umm...I jump around alot. And I don't feel like making my own userboxes. Killer cellos!!! 21:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC) ...Quite generous, but no thanks. The ones I'm looking at right now seem sane enough. Umm...thanks? That's too much to ask for. What about...@@@@ or !!!! or %@#$(?) Hehehehehe... All your userboxes are belong to me. Killer cellos!!! 15:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
Awarded for working so hard on the WikiProject! ) 22:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC) |
Fair use rationale for Image:Itestlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boulan bronco.gif
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Successful RfA - Thank you!
Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Tower Defence
Baka, I'm talking about Tower Defence the GENRE, not the actual GAME. I might do a brief bio on some of the games, though.
Everyone says "HI." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dattebayo321 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mathlinks logo.gif
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Millardnorth.gif
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mandelbrot competition.gif
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Itestlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Furbish Lousewort
I'm not clear about why you rejected my article on the Furbish lousewort. You said I provide insufficient context, but it's a plant. I say what it looks like, where it's found, it's taxonomy, that's it's endangered, when it was described. There's more you can say about it, but I reckon it's enough for a start. That's what's great about Wikipedia, the article can start out like that and more folk will come along and add more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.241.227.113 (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Repost of Jake Milliman
Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 45 | 5 November 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 46 | 12 November 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mathlinks logo.gif
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Math Project Competitions
Do you think that
--Heero Kirashami (talk) 06:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, you're fast and you're good. --Heero Kirashami (talk) 03:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Nburden's RFA
Thanks for the advice, and your consideration. I appreciate it, and hope to continue to have a positive impact on the encyclopedia. Nburden (T) 08:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Questions
First of all, how much do you love pandas(rate 1-10). Second, does "Copper, not wood." mean anything to you? Are there any grammatical or spelling mistakes in the last two sentences?--69.47.64.19 (talk) 21:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
P.S.(about the questions)
We only have seven cellos in our orchestra.--TheDoctor80 (talk) 21:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Deadline
You have one month to tell me which state I live in, my favorite kind of food, what math subject I'm in, my favorite subjects (in general), and the rest of my questions, or I will be very disappointed in you, very disappointed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDoctor80 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Templates for WP math
When tagging articles for the math project, please use {{
- The list of math articles is automatically maintained by a bot. Regular users like you and I only need to categorize the article appropriately, and the bot will add it to the list. — Carl (CBM · talk) 23:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Who am I???
Good one, always so technical, just like me. Nice signature by the way, you know I've always wondered what it meant, but I know it has to do with your e-mail archivetemperal. By the way, why nousernamesleft? Is this one of your weird jokes, for I know that you had this extremely weird sense of humor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDoctor80 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Name: Classified
You have to figure it out buddy. Copper, not wood! —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDoctor80 (talk • contribs) 23:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
OHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now I get it, you thought that it was Ms. Dattebayo321 who was the person on the other side of the computer of TheDoctor80. If I were in your situation, I would have done the same. Sorry, it is me who operates TheDoctor80. Oops, you don't know who I am (yet), so find out who I am, and you'll find "the sock puppet." This is just like a math problem (as I am sure you are used to) you have your Given, so make a conclusion, and prove it. This is your area of expertise, so this will not be a problem.--TheDoctor80 (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Sure
Guess and check is good, but takes long hours.--TheDoctor80 (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Time
You know, I have just realized that right now, where you are, it is around 6:46 over there, so even though we are typing technically at the same time, the time, due to the time zones in our respective areas are different. Is that not amazing?--TheDoctor80 (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Peter, that's Omar Seifeldin being soooo mysterious to you. Sue him.
Alex says HI, and Alex says hi.Norm vs.1337 (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Wrong. This is the chain...
- Omar makes his account and does his Uncyclopedia-like edits.
- Me notices edits. Me annoyed.
- Me finds Omar's noob-account and instantaneously figures out who he is.
- Me ROFLs at your cruddy deductive skills.
- Me spills beans on Omar.
It's not 3rd person, yet not 1st, either...Norm vs.1337 (talk) 00:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Ha ha!
No Peter, I did not do 1, 2, or 3. Just like I remembered you. I just got an account on Wikipedia a few days ago. When Alice was going through her account, I saw your user name on her talk page a lot, so I asked who it was, she told me it was you. Then I tracked you down, made sure it was you, and sure enough the old math genius, left us to go to Omaha, punctuation freak was Nousernamesleft. Also, your sig, Temperal was a big give away, for I have your e-mail address on my contacts (archivetemperal). Now Peter, since you know about 50000000000000000000 times more about geometry than I do (you bragged about that in your last message, thank you very much), know much about how things role around here, I will give you math problems to solve (from my homework) and ask your opinion and advice on what to do here. I am an amateur, you are an expert. Help me please. Thank you.--TheDoctor80 (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Refimprove on Fermat's Last Theorem
On November 23 you put a "refimprove" tag on Fermat's Last Theorem. Are there any particular statements in there that you felt were likely to be challenged and may need citations, and if so, could you care to indicate what they were? Basically everything concerning the history and the mathematical content is related by several of the references cited at the end, and it would only be annoying to the reader if we attached something like [3][4][7] to basically every other sentence. --Lambiam 10:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Response to your comment
Pointing out that some one is wrong on an issue is not a personal attack.
--CBKAtTopsails (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I consider your distortion of the facts a personal attack too.
--CBKAtTopsails (talk) 23:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
"Why don't you take it to
This will become necessary if you and your friend continue to make accusations and distortion of the facts without offering any explanations or proofs of what you're saying.
My advice to you is that next time before you accuse some one of making personal attack on another user, you should first initiate a conversation and politely tell the person what you think and allow the person to have a chance to respond.
I don't know where you are from. The spirit of the American principles is that the burden of proof lies the one who makes the accusation.
--CBKAtTopsails (talk) 17:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
"If you want diffs, here you go.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P_%3D_NP_problem&diff=177902980&oldid=177881870
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALambiam&diff=178976033&oldid=178155236"
Response: I don't understand why based on this, you accused me of attacking him but did not accuse him of attacking me. You need to elaborate. You also need to read the entire history of this matter on the discussion page on P vs NP in detail. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:P_%3D_NP_problem
"If you don't stop your continual rudeness, I will bring this to the Mediation Committee."
Response: Do whatever you want.
--CBKAtTopsails (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Siddhant!!!!!!!!!!!
Siddhant is coming back on the 29th! There will be a party at Ovi's house that day! I'm invited! Eddy is coming :(! We are going to watch Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End! We messed up so bad at our concert yesterday! We have break for one week! Wait! One week?! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDoctor80 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Adminship
At admin coaching, you posted: I'm actually not extremely interested in becoming an administrator, but I would like to know how the sysop tools work, and training would help.
- Why would you like to know how the sysop tools work? (reply on my talk page please) The Transhumanist 06:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
rfA test question
awesome Dlohcierekim 19:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Nousernamesleft! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply
Blackbird
I'm really sorry and can see that you spent a long time going through the Blackbird article, but I reverted your decapitalization of the species name. As a species name for a bird, it is always capitalized. The MOS says that individual Wikiprojects decide how their coverage capitalizes species, and WP:Birds subheading 9 says that all bird species names are to be capitalized. Sorry. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 21:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's always worth checking similar articles before making wholesale revision, especially when the article has already passed GA. All 10,000 bird articles are fully capped. We have all done something similar - I fully capped the name of an Italian opera not realising that that the normal style doesn't apply to Italian (:. Hope this helps, Jimfbleak (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 02:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For correctiong the spelling mistake on my user page, thankyou Phoenix-wiki 13:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Mathcounts
The article Mathcounts you nominated as a good article has failed , see Talk:Mathcounts for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment.
I have given some suggestions at Talk:Mathcounts#Failed "good article" nomination. Good luck! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Photo categories
Hey, Temperal. I just edited
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 |
About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 |
About the Signpost |
|
| |
Single-Page View
|
WP:POST
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
Mathcounts is now a GA
Congratulations! The article has addressed all issues that were brought in its last nomination, I can not see a reason why it can not be promoted to GA now. One note though, I'd prefer to see some more pictures in this article to improve its visual attractiveness.I hope now you would consider reviewing an article nominated for GA status and help with the backlog on Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your excellent work on talk ) 15:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Images mathcounts kevin chen.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)