User talk:OSS117

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:OSS117/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OSS117! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Indeed, this is not an article. The draft for review is since 8 November 2019, in Special:Diff/925184549 or here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Brazilian_number . I wait for the review of this draft. Merci. OSS117 (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci CiaPan for your last improvements in my draft on Brazilian numbers. OSS117 (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission provides insufficient

guide to writing better articles

for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Brazilian number
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Brazilian number, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to point out that a couple of us have been making improvements to the merged article repdigit, expanding on the work you did on Brazilian numbers. You are very welcome to continue contributing to the article. I realize you have found this a somewhat rocky experience -- please let me know if I can be of help in any way.

All the best,

Hello, OSS117. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]