User talk:Oerjan

Welcome!

Hello, Oerjan, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Thanks for the fix on the stability condition. I'm going to try to make sure the situation is more overt by casting the conditions in both forms. –Dan Hoey 20:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm a little less sure about changing the definition of stability. The two aren't equivalent without linearity. Are you sure the usual definition of stability assumes that A({c+s_n}) = c+A({s_n})? –Dan Hoey 22:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

That's what the discussion at

Talk:1 − 2 + 3 − 4 + · · · led me to believe. Without it, the argument discussed there cannot be done without regularity. But as I said, someone should look it up. I did try to change the sequence definition to match your series definition. --Ørjan 23:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malbolge may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s and 3 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks,

Well I think the more Wikis you can make a fool of yoursef on the better! Seriously, spotting the discrepancy in dates was a good catch & I'm very ashamed of the hash I made in correcting it.TheLongTone (talk) 23:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Your edit summary said, "(Reverting vandalism on absent user's page, hope this is OK)" -- just so you know, this was perfectly acceptable. While editing a user page should be left up to the user, removing vandalism is one of the recognized exceptions to this practice. Happy editing! Etamni | ✉ | ✓  10:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

We each looked at different things, EACH of which are wrong! Go figure!! Fiddle Faddle 00:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, so we are! --Ørjan (talk) 00:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solving that one is complex. It cannot be solved by changing the order of the list, nor by a simple explanation, because the mouseover labels come up and confuse the reader. You are 100%% correct with the order of the pictures. I am 100% correct with the order of the labels. Neither of these orders agrees with the list the way it is stated Fiddle Faddle 00:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oerjan. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oerjan. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oerjan. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only in the Northern Hemisphere, of course, have there not been winter Ramadans since 2010 (Not that polar night's been an issue at any permanent mosques south of the equator AFAIK). Daniel Case (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]