User talk:Onel5969/Archive 74

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 70

←

Archive 72

Archive 73

Archive 74

Archive 75

Archive 76

→

Archive 80

Archive 62: January 2020

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

– Utopes (talk) 04:37, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

And that's all she wrote folks. I took a few days off to donate a kidney on December 30, and when I came back the concerted, orchestrated wikihounding by several editors was not only back, but ramped up. Don't need that type of aggravation. Good luck to you all. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no idea what happened, but know that I'll miss you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

+1 So sorry for what you've been through, One. I hope everything works out for you, and that after a restful, healing break you'll come back. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 00:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

+++1 You made an unbeliveable contribution to WP and your NPP skill and work-rate was unparalleled. You were on my list of 25 editors who WP needs to function properly (and most are admins). Really (really) sad to see this; and wondering WTF was going on? Britishfinance (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

I'll presumptively lay out the category and have your locker cleared out for the next guy. figure of speech ミラP 00:46, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Hopefully you'll come back. This passes WP:GEO and should not have been deleted. FWIW I'm willing to open a DRV for this. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 17:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I'd concur on both counts: hopefully you will come back, and that this should have an article. @Valoem:: I'd go ahead, add a couple sources, and recreate it. SportingFlyer T·C 23:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allan Lake Landing, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Lake Landing, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angell, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angell, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apex, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apex, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babbit Winter, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babbit Winter, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bishop Place, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Place, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Falls Crossing, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:35, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centennial, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centennial, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midway, La Paz County, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midway, La Paz County, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:45, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nommel Place, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nommel Place, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Onel - I just saw the message at the top of this page. This goes way beyond 'we'll miss you' - you will leave a hole, and I can't see how it will be filled. I don't know the details of what was going on, and if course you must do what's right for you and your recovery post-op, but I just want you to know how highly regarded you are, and how sorry I am you won't be contributing. So long, and thanks for all the fish. GirthSummit _(blether) 22:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

I just wanted to echo Girth: I'm very sorry see this and hope that, after some time away from the drama quagmire, you might consider resuming your incredibly valuable work. – Joe (talk) 08:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

^^^True... Thank you for what you did, I appreciate your contributions. Puddleglum ^2.0 15:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chair Crossing, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chair Crossing, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Sorry to see you go. Please take a break for an appropriate duration and then reconsider. For every editor you might have had trouble with, there are surely many more who admire and respect you and your work. P.S. thanks for reviewing many of my articles. Best wishes! Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

	Lifetime Achievement Barnstar
	You are an inspiration to several aspiring Wikipedians like me and it is quite difficult to see that a veteran editor like you are going to be missed forever. You have done remarkable contributions to Wikipedia and especially at NPP. We are missing you and hope you will bounce back stronger. All the best and good luck for the rest of your life. Abishe (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chair Crossing, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chair Crossing, Arizona (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 15:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coconino, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corva, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corva, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cosnino, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosnino, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coyote Basin Ranch, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coyote Basin Ranch, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darling, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darling, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daze, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daze, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Durfee Crossing, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durfee Crossing, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Echinique Place, Arizona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echinique Place, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Goodbye, friend. I really hope you return soon. Oh, and donating a kidney is such a generous and selfless thing to do. Thank you for your service.

}} me in replies) 22:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I would like St. Pete/Clearwater Elite Invitational reviewed please. I think it was reviewed before but wasn't passed. I made some more changes to it, I wanted to see if it will be approved. If you can not pass it, please let me know what I can fix on it. Thanks

Eibln (talk) 16:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

I will miss you a lot. I hope you change your mind and come back one day, but don't feel presured, do what's best for you.

) 15:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

It’s hard to say goodbye but rest assured that your legacy will never be forgotten. Celestina007 (talk) 20:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

I think it's too soon to be talking about legacy. I expect Onel5969 back after a short while. (I think I do understand why he left for a while, and why others do it in similar circumstances. I'm available by email if you'd like to talk to me about it.) Your work has been extremely valuable, and I very much miss your contributions in the area wer both work on. We have not always agreed on particular articles or issues, but that's true for any two people here who try to think for themselves. Reviewing NP and drafts is not a mechnical exercise, and thinking is required. I count on you for it. DGG ( talk ) 08:57, 28 January 2020 (UTC)