User talk:OwenReeceBaines

Welcome!

Hello, OwenReeceBaines, and

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! OwenReeceBaines, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the SarahStierch (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from

The article SocialFire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:PROMO

article for a website posted by the owner/CEO of site, with zero sources given for notability; "Socialfire" gets zero gnews hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 07:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SocialFire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SocialFire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SocialFire, you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to SocialFire.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   22:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD is false. All past deletions have been declined, And the same editor is doing all the Deletion requests. It stupid that i have to put up with this. OwenReeceBaines (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the way the deletion process works at Wikipedia; almost everything that gets deleted at AfD are things that were previously proposed for

WP:AFDFORMAT. The sort of things you've been doing - deleting AfD notices, refactoring another editor's notices - are more likely to get your account blocked and leave you powerless in the AfD discussion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

By the way, you may want to stop the false complaint that all of the deletion requests have come from the same editor. I am not User:MikeWazowski, nor is he me. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, I blocked on the basis of the

WP:ANI if you can't resolve it with the editor in question. Removing AfD templates is not the way to answer issues with other editors though. If you want me to unblock, I'm happy to so long as you agree to not remove AfD templates, even if you believe the AfD was entered in bad faith. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm fairly certain that User:JohnArmold is a sockpuppet of this account. I've extended this block to an indefinite one until this issue, along with the others mentioned above, are properly addressed by the user. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.