User talk:PS2pcGAMER

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message if you a question, comment, or just want to say hi. Just make sure to sign it (with ~~~~) and create a subsection for it at the bottom of the page.

Admin actions: If you disagree with an admin action of mine, leave me a message and I'll definitely look into it. If you are pretty confident that I have made a mistake, admins should feel free to revert me (just let me know).

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Davesmith33"

You will notice if you removed those rose-tinted spectacles that it is DrFrench and yourself who are in fact undoing other people's edits repeatedly, without first discussing them on the talk page.

Can you tell me exactly what is wrong with the following statement: "Richard Hammond introduced a new "presenter" at the start of Series 8, a female Labradoodle named "Top Gear Dog", who is susceptible to motion sickness. However, she only appeared twice in Series 9."?

In spite of the vandalism that repeatedly occurred when the article was unprotected, this article was still vandalized even by users with accounts older than four days. In fact, the article was vandalized AGAIN right after you removed the protection. Have YOU reviewed the history before removing the protection on the article? I disagree strongly with the removal of the protection and plan to reverse both the recent vandalism and your change to restore the protection a third time or ask the administrators to get involved a third time. lwalt 16:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up to previous message - We have an uptick in vandalizing the James Brown article again. As was the case before, the article was vandalized by both named and IP users (in one case, the same person revandalized the article after that person's initial vandalism was reverted). I've mentioned in my previous message, editors for this article have gone through the exercise of keep up with the constant vandalism on two earlier occasions, which necessitated protection. So, we're right were we started having to chase vandals to keep the article intact. lwalt 20:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting rather frustrated by his actions. It seem to me that as he couldn't have his way over TGD, he's thrown his toys out of the pram. It seeems to me a clear case of

I think I'm going to sleep on it and see what he's like in the morning. If he's doing the same, then I'll go down the

WP:RFC route. DrFrench 22:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Sadly since his 3RR block, he doesn't to have changed his approach, so I've posted {{rfc-ucc}} on his talk page. Hopefully he'll take note and try to build consensus. DrFrench 20:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a guideline to not submit a TV show for GA while it is still showing. The cruft levels just got too high over the past couple of months, time for another prune. And our friend Dave didn't help things either! --Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 01:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After receiving complaints about the inclusion of

I have also reduced the size of the template we think it should go in only the central /core articles only not on any film or actor articles. This is only for the American template ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 21:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the slow reply. Thanks for the update and hard work on coming to a compromise. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete this:[1]? It's not even really a screenshot. I was going to try to come up with some rationale to use it in the article to illustrate the person's artisitic abilities but I don't think it will pass fair use muster. At least I don't see any way. Thanks in advance.

I uploaded it by the way, in case that wasn't clear.

Quadzilla99 12:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Actually I found and added a different tag, maybe you could just look it over, if you feel it doesn't merit inclusion you can just delete it—no explanation needed.

Quadzilla99 12:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Are you thinking of making it an official essay? I mean out of userspace, that way you shortcut to it through

Quadzilla99 16:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll tell you why I'm notable. I am a Novell Support Forum SysOp. There are less than 30 of these in the world, and membership is invitation-only. Such a person has to exhibit a number of qualities to receive such an invitation. To verify that I am indeed a SysOp, please visit the list of Novell SysOps[2]. This makes me more notable than other people, such as Sanjaya Malakar. He has an article because he's a bad singer. I have a great deal of knowledge with Novell products, I help the user community a great deal, and I have been recognized by being invited to an exclusive club. Jmmarton 02:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there.

I'm interested to see what you think. In regards to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Speedies_again..., I deleted an article that you said didn't qualify for db-copyvio.

I find the CSD on it sketchy, and I wondered if you agreed. I went behind you and deleted the article as I felt that copyvios should be deleted on sight, and if a valid contest is made to myself or the Foundation the article should be restored. However, the criterion does seem to read that any sort of hang-on tag means to not delete the article.

I went ahead and deleted

...and that's an example of how process can work :) Good stuff. See you around, Teke 05:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I feel that when a plausible claim of permission is made, we don't need to delete on sight. In this case the article (or page as it wasn't really an article yet) was clearly copied from a website. On the talk page, the creator claimed to be the owner of that site and author of the text. This is not a case where the site was a celebrity site or a major institutiuonal or corporate site for which such a claim is highly implausable. I would have put a note on the creator's talk page, indicatign how the claim could be validated (relase on site, or email to foundation's permissions address, and warnign that the text would not remain unchanged. If the creator responded within a day or so saying that he was persuing either option, i would wait. None of that is required, but the CSD does say "and no claim of permisison is made". In this case the article would require so much claenup I'm not willing to undelete and cleanup, but I think that doing so would be proper. Of course a hangon alone is never reason not to delete a clear speedy, althouhg if the hangon was posted only a few minutes poreviously i will usually wiat to see what the creator has to say. All just my opnion, of course. Also, when deleting for copyvio, I think it is a good idea to paste the source URL into the delete reason. DES ^(talk) 22:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P- Thanks a lot for your nomination and support in my RfA. Hopefully I'll live up to it- Staecker 12:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request, I will delete the scanned images.

Anthony22 13:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to wikinews — n:template:hello. Happy editing. Bawolff 00:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 00:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit of the Michael Jordan page because he, in fact, was called "Superman" (mostly in 97-98). Chicago media personalities would refer to Jordan as Superman, Pippen as Batman, and Rodman was -well, Rodman (get it, Superman, Batman and Rod-man?). It was a stupid media thing that got Jordan and the team more attention, but it was a nickname nonetheless. Search the Google News archive for [superman batman rodman] for confirmation. RMelon 15:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can some start a Polish-American Relations page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kaminski Aleksander (talk • contribs).

I made a comment on

Ok I will but I just wanted to make it clear that his behavior goes farther than just his edit history under his current username. I'll keep an eye on him.

Quadzilla99 19:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Yeah, sorry about that. I didn't know what the tag was, and some were just "uploaded newer version" instead of complete replacement. I'll try and make sure that I do that from now on. Did you get all of them?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me)

There were others, I took care of them.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a

I'm fine with your comment, and the origial did sound rather like all too many vanity pages. It was more the "gold medal" (which turned out to be sourcable) than the Lovre declaration (wahich wasn't in the sources I found). I am sure you acted in good faith. But I see a lot of editors overusign the A7 tag, and a number of cases where admisn are IMO too quick on the delte button with stuiff that claims notability but is poorly written. I brought this to DRV as much as a public example to others as anything. Not to admonish you in any way -- we all make mistakes and have differences of judgement -- but because this way others can (I hope) learn from this example. I trust that you don't see bringing such things to DRV as in any way an attack or anything but a disagreemnt with a particular action. I had and have no such intention. DES ^(talk) 21:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your further edits on this. i hadn't wikified Germany and Switzerland beacus both were linked to in the leading sentace -- but perhaps it looks odd to have a list of which soem are links and some are not. DES ^(talk) 21:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?GSalt 14:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious why you deleted the image I provided for the CZ-85 pistol. I thought I submitted it correctly with the proper permissions.

Gustloff

Thank you for your comments on my talk page about the closing of the FPC, I summed up the pro's and con's and the image did not have enough consensus for promotion and was listed on April 13, then I closed it as npt promoted and ut was re-opened for no reason with an edit summary saying something like "closed by a new user". I needed someone to back up what I'd done because I didnt think I was in the wrong. Thanks a lot!

Hey, I replied there. Please do upload your pictures to commons, our current policy is that as long as the copyright is fine, it's fine with us, and the copyright for these photos is fine (that is, presuming you agree to release them under a free license :)). Yonatan ^talk 00:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for your kind and caring attitude throughout the FPC nomination of the tomato picture phenomenon, you were kind and extremely polite. Happy editing! The Sunshine Man 10:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply ]

Thanks :-). I'm sorry the situation was made so difficult for you, but thanks for sticking through it all. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine, I'm OK, maybe I got too ahead of myself, I still intend to contribute on a daily basis here. Kindest regards -

The Sunshine Man 10:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi AmiDaniel/Betacommand/PS2pcGAMER. There's quite a queue building up for authorisation to use VandalProof. I'm hoping someone's going to be available to go through the list and grant/refuse permission as necessary. Cheers, A bit iffy 11:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

For the record, I'm the one who orphaned it :p I did forget to tag it as {{

orfud}} though. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Red Flag

Hello, I've reverted your edits to the Red Flag article. "Boxes of food from China.", the image you introduced are not boxes of food from China, point in fact it's a real world image... hence they're boxes of food from the shop. It's also debatable as to if the image is free.

Matthew 09:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

See

Matthew 09:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

"Not sure if this image is truely [

Matthew 09:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Jericho Cop

Where did you find the picture of the Sheriff's Car in Jericho. Where is the set located in Van Nuys. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:cwk14724:cwk14724 (talk • contribs).

The picture of the car was taken on the set. The location of the set (although I am not sure what is left of it) is listed on CBS's website: [4]. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 08:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jericho Cop 2

Can You send mi pics of the emergency vehicles or upload them to wikipedia or send them to my e-mail. What do you do for the show? ([email protected]) <small--cwk14724 (talk) 19:53, 14 Jun 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I only have the one image that is on Wikipedia already. I don't work on the show, I was just invited to visit the set by a member of the crew and that's how I got the pictures. Have a good day. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 22:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jericho Cop 3

Can you send me a link of where i can see the set on the WIndows Live map [live.local.com] --cwk14724 (talk) 09:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to sound like a jerk, by why don't you just put the above address that is in the link two threads above into the website yourself? The imagery was before the set was built, so there isn't really anything to see. All that can be made out in the hospital and library. Main street is the short North-South road in the middle of the image. Anyway... [5]. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message to my IP

hey, you sent me a message saying that there was vandalism or something like it coming from my IP. I'd just like to apoligeise and say it won't happen again. This is a family computer and it gets used by a lot of people including family friends. I'll find out who did whatever happened and give them a dressing down. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.142.201.138 (talk • contribs).

New to VandalProof

Hi, I was recently approved by Betacommand to use VandalProof. However, once I downloaded the 136 zip file and VP137.exe file, I cannot log in. The program can locate my username and password, however, it says: "No priviliges found." Also, I clicked on the button Verify Authorisation, yet it still didn't work. Can you please help? Thanks. σмgнgσмg 06:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of

Ford Focus ST

CSD A1

.

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon

}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. --Rrburke^(talk) 02:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TopGearNews.jpg)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

VandalProof Backlog

If you're not to busy could you check out the VP registration page - theres like a two week backlog on the page. Thanks Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 05:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Proof Request Backlog, Can you clear it?

talk

) 11:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal Proof Request Backlog, Can you clear it?

talk) 11:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Vandal Proof

Thanks for clearing the backlog, and granting me access :-) here have a cookie

talk) 10:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Prom3th3an has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks a lot for VP auth!Cheers. Prashanthns (talk) 12:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalproof

Thanks for the approval, but if you get the chance, could you "unapprove"

paranomia^{happy harry's high club} 00:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oops, I forgot to do that last night. All done now. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog

Thanks for your work on the Vandal Proof approval page, but I'm afraid that there is still a backlog. If you've got time, could you please fix the backlog? Thanks J.T Pearson (talk) 12:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second this, it's getting quite long. FusionMix 13:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Proof

Can you please approve me for VandalProof? I've had my name in for a while now, and I have enough edits. Cheers! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 13:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry guys, I have been really busy in real life. I have been meaning to get to this and I haven't forgotten. You can also try asking some of the other moderators if you haven't already. If not, I'll try to do it within the next week. Thanks for your patience and I know it is frustrating because you are trying to get access to something that will make your vandalism hunting a little easier. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top Gear presenters images

Hi, I noticed that the images of the Top Gear presenters you uploaded to the commons have been nominated for speedy deletion. It would seem that it's because you pasted the contents of the email into the description page rather than forwarding it onto [email protected] - can I ask you to do this if you still have the emails, they're great images and I'd hate for them to be deleted on a technicality. Thanks,

AlexJ (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not sure, when people contact me through flickr's PM I get an email with the contents of their message. Might just be the way my preferences are setup there. If your account didn't do that, then it's a situation I'm not familiar with, and I guess the screenshots idea is probably the best one. I'm not sure if the OTRS email ([email protected]) accepts attachments but there's only one way to find out. Once you've sent an email, I'd add {{Otrs pending}} to the image description page on commons instead of the speedy message, which should hopefully stop the other two being deleted. On your other point, I totally agree that it's ridiculous to delete something within 10 hours of notification, and more so that a complex case such as this (where some evidence of permission is provided) is covered by a speedy delete in the first place. Hope you can get it sorted.

AlexJ (talk) 23:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Elevation Church

I began to make an article for Elevation Church but found that one already existed but was deleted. After reading the deletion log and seeing that it was speedy deleted for a7, I think I can write an article that establishes notability, but am I required to get administration approval before recreating a deleted article or can I just create it on my own?Ltwin (talk) 06:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalprrof

Do you know what has happened to Vandalproof? It no longer seems to be working. I am asking you because you are listed as a moderator and user:Daniel seems to have disappeared. SpinningSpark 09:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

good article status. Hope you'll join us. Go Broncos!

--Dabackgammonator (talk) 04:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply