User talk:Patricknd42

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Speedy deletion of Rafae Quireshi

section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox
for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paste (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources
.

Please

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Edison (talk) 20:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

welcome page
if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Patrick Mutchler

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. JEB90 (talk) 21:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Paste (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Patrick Mutchler

guide to writing your first article
.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado (talk) 12:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hong Kong. J.delanoygabsadds 18:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TNX-Man 16:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. –Capricorn42 (talk) 14:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Agriculture. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. AnyPerson (talk) 03:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as St. Ignace, Michigan's first lemon, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. AnturiaethwrTalk 21:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

talk) 16:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

talk 16:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Blue-footed Booby. Thingg 16:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

March 2010

introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. from hajatvrc with WikiLove @ 15:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Field archery, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Battle of Yorktown (1862). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted
.

September 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Theodore Roosevelt , you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~~ GB fan ~~ 13:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another disruptive edit today at
talk) 13:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 19:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]