User talk:Pd1 uob

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Speedy deletion of Pashto Adab

Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias
into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

Arbiteroftruth (talk) 17:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

November 2008

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (EhJJ)TALK 17:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Pashto Adab

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pashto Adab, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-English content. No assertion as to its notability. Incoherent contents for those who are not knowledgeable in this language (which includes many users here in English Wikipedia)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

Arbiteroftruth (talk) 18:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox
for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nathan Laing (talk) 11:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Article Wizard
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pseudomonas(talk) 11:10, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback section and email address

Hi. I am not sure which WP policy applies (though I am sure one does) but I removed your "feedback" section and your email address from

Kasi Tribe. The feedback section is not how to do it - that's why the article has a Talk page - and I think it is very, very unwise to put your personal email address up on a WP page. I hope this helps,, best wishes, DBaK (talk) 13:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Copyright violation?

Hi, I'm sorry to bother you again but

Kasi Tribe seems to have quite a lot copied from "The Afghans" By Willem Vogelsang. I've left a note on Talk:Kasi Tribe about this. You may want to attend to it. Best wishes, DBaK (talk) 13:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Please see also
Kasi (tribe) which seems to have been judged an unambiguous copyvio. Thanks DBaK (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Also
Kasi Quetta is the same duplicate copyvio from the Vogelsang book. Please STOP creating these. Continued creations of copyvio articles is considered vandalism and leads to banning from editing. feydey (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh dear, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 September 29 for more on this. DBaK (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

introduction to editing. Thank you. SMC (talk) 10:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. This article makes extensive use of someone else's copyright material. This has already been pointed out to you previously. andy (talk) 15:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Kasi Tribe

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 15:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

copyright violation

You have repeatedly created pages including copyrighted material (7 times that I am aware of, from the book "The Afghans"). Please stop doing that or you will be blocked. If you want to improve the articles do that in your own words. Moreover, all the articles you create are about the same subject. There is no need to create new articles, a simple redirect is sufficient as I did from

Kasi Tribe to Kansi. Please do not create any more separate articles on this same subject as this is disruptive. If you want, contribute to Kansi or propose a move/rename. But please, I repeat, do not include the same copyrighted material as you have been warned many times and failing to understand that will result in a block. Thanks Antipastor (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Kasi Pashtun

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Antipastor (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright
infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Antipastor (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pd1 uob. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

October 2009

96 18:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Sockpuppetry
case

You have been accused of

96 18:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]