User talk:Personisgaming

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Path slopu was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't seem notable. Please use correct referencing method.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ElectricFish (malware) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PATH SLOPU 10:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Personisgaming! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PATH SLOPU 10:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Garuda28 (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lazarus Group, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please be careful with capitalization, as well. "Computer Intrusion" and "Second" were incorrectly (and inexplicably) capitalized. Thanks for your close attention to this. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding the category "National Security Agency Field Sites Directorate". There is no such category on Wikipedia, so it shows up as a redlink. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the field sites directorate was called "Directorate F"

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lazarus Group, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Apollo (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Apollo (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Is there a formal cause for deletion?

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leschnei (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

Hey, could you start using edit summaries as shown above? ☆ Bri (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Personisgaming (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ATTN:Working on new article

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ElectricFish (malware) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you might want to work on your new article

I see her name has been in the Capital One article for awhile, unfortunately. Still, your new "main" article on the breach needs to have more information than is in the Capital One article (presently, it has much less) and the accused is not the "perpetrator" until convicted. Schazjmd (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Capital One data breach, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

These links are already in the infobox.[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/SureWeCan3 online, 2 PM Sunday, Sept 6. Jim.henderson (talk) 00:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Personisgaming. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 02:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 21st, 11am-1pm E.S.T: NYC COVID-19: Environmental Justice in Public Health Edit-A-Thon - ONLINE

Hello Personisgaming!! You are invited to join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 2nd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - this Saturday, Nov 21st, 2020 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, we'd love to see you (online). Saturday November 21 NYC COVID-19: Environmental Justice in Public Health Edit-A-Thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki). 11:00am - 1:00 pm E.S.T online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wil540 art: Dear Wil540 art what facility in Brooklyn will the edit-athon take place ? Personisgaming (talk) 18:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Personisgaming - The event will take place online but it is hosted by Sure We Can, a redemption center and environmental organization located in Bushwick, Brooklyn. --Wil540 art (talk) 19:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Hal Ketchum. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough detail to warrant a separate page at this point.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Death of Hal Ketchum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Death of Hal Ketchum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this was taken care of above. Any questions just let me know. Red Director (talk) 21:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Personisgaming. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BASHLITE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symantec.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikolay Bogdanovsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 35th Army.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited APT40, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proofpoint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ghislaine Maxwell has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Keivan.f^Talk 22:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Carding sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US Scheduled Substances has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello Personisgaming, I see your recent Update tag on the Rhysida (hacker group) article. Do you have any links to sources or news that should be included? Chumpih ^t 04:58, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the question; You can see here for sources @Chumpih.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Rhysida+(hacker+group)&sca_esv=537cb7f0bc786b92&hl=en-US&prmd=invmbstz&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiHtsXz-LSEAxVvIjQIHcHUA64Q0pQJegQIBhAC&biw=1556&bih=887&dpr=1.75 Personisgaming (talk) 13:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Are there any in particular that warranted the 'update' notice? I see the ones there are before the article date, or mention the British Library hack, which has its own article. Chumpih ^t 13:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So perhaps it's not clear what needs to be updated. Have removed tag for now. Chumpih ^t 23:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Landon Ingraham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Patterson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]