User talk:Peter G Werner
UCSF project
Hi! I am currently revamping the UCSF project. I created lots of pages and added a lot of content, but there is so much still to do. I saw that you are part of the SFBA task force, so I thought you might be interested and I wanted to invite you to collaborate once more. In particular, we need to add content, do maintenance, and we really would benefit from pictures, so if you are in SF and could help that would be great. Thanks!Eccekevin (talk) 15:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Peter G Werner! We are looking for editors to join |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Peter G Werner. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
User:Peter G Werner/Template:Infobox Scientist listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
WikiProject Apple Inc.
Hello Peter G Werner,
You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.
WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.
See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.
Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.
- RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for May 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
The file File:BlackFlagNervousBreakdown.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sample used in
WP:NFCC#3aif applicable)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
Proposed deletion of File:I Against I.ogg
I recently proposed deletion on
]File:Pay to Cum.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pay to Cum.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
Disambiguation link notification for April 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Death Ship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Nomination of The Trend for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Trend until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Toa Nidhiki05 18:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Heche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Another World.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Bergman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton College.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
AFD and Old Vedanta Society Temple
Hi Peter G Werner, Thank you for participating thoughtfully/generously at ongoing
- Hi @Doncram! Thanks for the heads-up. You might also want to add something in the entry for "Vedanta Society of Northern California" about the "New Temple" and Vallejo and Fillmore Streets, built in 1959 and used for most of their worship activities. Though the "Old Temple" is still actively used for some functions as well. I don't go out to Cow Hollow much anymore, but it wouldn't be hard to go out there and take some pictures. Though I'm not sure what I could contribute that would be better than the image you're already using.
- On the topic of Filbert Steps, there's actually material I want to contribute on the topic of the Filbert/Greenwich/Vallejo steps, but still feel that would be best covered as a section of the Telegraph Hill article. Peter G Werner (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for replying, and, great... I am frankly confused about whether there are multiple separated sections of steps called the same or differently. Btw, I have article Draft:Dipsea Trail to finish; I am impressed by the organizers' documentation with many photos of the Dipsea course; I think it would be awesome if someone could make sense, in a wikipedia article, of the Filbert Steps that way.
- About photos of the temple, oh there is so much more there, inside and out, that might be photographed and directly included as illustrations to make points within an article, or in a gallery below. Have you ever seen Jesus Christ in a yoga pose??? See that and more images, not available to us but maybe you could visit and photograph, at sfvvedanta.org page on Old Temple. The Jesus Christ was painted in 1908, which for artwork in a museum would usually be old enough that copyright would run out, but there's mention there of it being explicitly copyrighted then, and then I dunno if that copyright could have been renewed or what. So there might be something to work out, perhaps requiring a new permission (using wp:OTRSsystem?) or release of copyright from them, for us to use a new or old image of that artwork. I footnoted that webpage as a source and a couple other sources at the row in the Hindu temples table; one is about a journal article that I will see about getting. Especially if you might visit there, I am getting interested in writing an article citing the journal article and more, and in the process of that would likely identify specific details where a photo would ideally be found.
- cheers, --Doncram (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for replying, and, great... I am frankly confused about whether there are multiple separated sections of steps called the same or differently. Btw, I have article
I see the AFD about Filbert Street was closed "No consensus" with some statement about no prejudice for some continuation. I think i might have done too much there, when my general wish is to support local editors doing what makes sense. I tried to make a case, but more strongly i want to defer to you and others actually developing on the topic. So if you go ahead and develop the topic in Telegraph Hill article or whatever, and then think it is time to redirect the Filbert Street article, I think you should just go ahead with that. I won't object. (U could just make a note at the Talk page left behind, which should have a link to the AFD.) cheers, --Doncram (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring & lack of AGF at E. O. Wilson
You've been around a while so I'll spare you the template. You should know by now that your recent behavior at E. O. Wilson is unacceptable, from edit warring the disputed template back into the article [1][2] to the assumptions of bad faith on the talk page [3][4][5]. This behavior is quite simply standing in the way of your stated goals, and if it continues may result in sanctions. Generalrelative (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @WP:AGF goes both ways, does it not? Am I not allowed to point out editorial bias when I see it? I am trying to not ascribe motive, but the stated reasons for removing this content from the article come across to me as POV in the extreme, in effect even if not in intent. Peter G Werner (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)]
- And as for my statements being "unacceptable", can you point out where I've made a personal attack? I've simply pointed out that I think that the decision to not include this content strikes me as POV (is it "unacceptable" to state this plainly?) and that because it's pretty obvious that there's a vehement disagreement over the shape of this article that it would be a good thing for other editors to evaluate this decision. Peter G Werner (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Heche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advocate.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IWantItAllNow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IWantItAllNow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
The file File:NGMiscarriage.ogg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the