User talk:Polymathcult

Hello, Polymathcult, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Melcous (talk) 08:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.ead.ae/Pages/h-e-razan-khalifa-al-mubarak.aspx, https://www.biosaline.org/news/2018-06-27-6535, http://wam.ae/en/details/1395302696421.

closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here

.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Razan Khalifa Al-Mubarak may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Polymathcult! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Polymathcult,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Polymathcult. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 17:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lauren London, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 04:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

...be very careful when you add sources. If a person is spoken of in a source as having a love of something, then going off to college, it cannot be said (only from such general statements), that the subject that they loved became their major in college. We must be both precise and accurate in our renderings from sources.

Moreover, if you are adding sources to text already appearing (post hoc, forensic sourcing), if coming upon a source with content close to what the text says, we must edit the original text to correspond to the newly placed source. To do otherwise is to give only the appearance of completeness (and scholarship). In fact, adding a source without making sure the text is fully accurate to that source makes the article less encyclopedic, and further from being a GA article (because what was a superficial, obvious problem is now hidden). Cheers. [ a frmr editor and prof, looking in ] 2601:246:C700:19D:A11E:908B:8D52:6AF6 (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]