User talk:PrinceofPunjab

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts the Arab–Israeli conflict articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles climate change gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people He should not be given alerts for those areas.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Women in Red April 2025

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Dude, not to curse or anything, but WTF was that edit you made to the Rookie episodes article? That's vandalism. I get if you don't want to edit it anymore but please don't just remove all of your edits. That's technically vandalism. HiGuys69420 (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HiGuys69420, How is not wanting my own edits to be seen on the article a “vandalism”? I just removed all of my edits and didn’t touched any edit of other users. I think I should be allowed to delete my work. It goes beyond making my point. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ^{(PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ)} 14:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sjö, I don’t want my edits to remain on that page and left it as it was before my edits. It should not be considered vandalism if I am only removing my work. And also, I don’t blanked any section. I only removed the DVR ratings that I added. They are not even needed. Many Shows don’t even have them. Like here. On second thought, I think you should report me. I think getting banned would actually help me in this case (and other users might be happy).ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ ^{(PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ)} 14:10, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]