User talk:ProprioMe OW
May 2015
Hello, I'm DemocraticLuntz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bubble gum because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 22:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi DemocraticLuntz! Thanks for the advices... i'm still in the process of learning, anyway i think my ProprioMe OW (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)]
June 4
Hello - This is the Communications Manager of the OSA, Ben Rycroft. I see you have undone a number of my edits on the Ontario Soccer page. The information in this article is nearly completely outdated. If you would like to update the information, please feel free. Otherwise, please do not keep reverting my edits
- Hi there, have just replied on your ProprioMe OW (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)]
ProprioMe OW, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
|
Hi ProprioMe OW!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi ProprioMe OW! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
- The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
- The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
- The Teahouse new editor help space
- Wikipedia Help pages
- Hi ProprioMe OW! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:26, Thursday, May 21, 2015 (
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Reverting Vandalism
Hey, I recently noticed you reverting vandalism at Salvador Dalí - thanks for that, by the way.
I thought I should let you know that the method you used to revert the vandalism (pressing "undo" for each individual edit) was needlessly complex. If you just go to the page's history, select the timestamp of the last clean edit, press edit and then submit the page (with a summary such as "reverting vandalism"), you can immediately go back to that version of the page without having to make so many undos.
Additionally, you may be interested in
Have a good day,
Underscorre (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Underscorre! I already realized the better way to revert a sequence of vandalism was the one you pointed out, but had not yet tried.
- The main reason was the fact in that case i'd like to write a phrase like the one placed by bots in the edit summary (reverting X by user Y to version by user Z), the single undo feature automatically adding a description... following the "quick" way i should write a little more, but it's indeed much less complex when reverts are more than two or three.
- Will follow your advice and have a look to Twinkleas well.
- Thank you again, and have a good day too!
- ProprioMe OW (talk) 07:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)]
A cookie for you!
|
Thanks for reverting and fighting vandalism! I really appreciate it! ~HackedBotato Chat with me ♽ Contribs 14:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC) |
- Wow, a cookie!! Thank you so much ~HackedBotato! :-D
- ProprioMe OW (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)]
A kitten for you!
Thank you for removing vandalism on Carbon cycle
Chamith (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you so much ProprioMe OW (talk) 13:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)]
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for reverting the vandalism on ♥ 17:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC) ]
|
- Thank you so much Isabelle♥!!
Rollback
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting
- Hi ProprioMe OW (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)]
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks! Widgetdog (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC) |
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Templating vandals and bad edits
Please consider "templating" editors who do bad edits. Here is a list of
]ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, ProprioMe OW. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
February 2017
- Thank you Gamebuster19901! Twinkle automatically opens the talk page for that purpose... will try to use warning templates more often. I've always been a little dubious about using warnings, as i think "real" vandals care very little about them. Can see, though, your point for other users, particularly when reverting good faith edits. Thanks again :)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Good job! - TheMagnificentist 00:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC) |
Wrong Pictures
Thanks for catching the wrong pictures. Slight problem will be though, that as they are not obviously wrong, they will keep coming back as long as they (and/or their category) are still marked with the template and id on commons. Once that is adjusted (preferably with a title adjustmend) there should be peace. Maybe you have done that already, then sorry for the reminder. Keep up the good work. Agathoclea (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
location info on NRHP places
Hey, I noticed your edits adding some information to NRHP places articles, and I thought you accidentally deleted some location info and I restored it. Now I see that these edits by you deleted similar info for another. Hey, don't drop that info! Could you please restore it. It seems obviously useful and it is sourced from the NRIS database, I believe.
I get notices of these because your edits must have added a link to some article i created a long time ago; it is kind of random that I checked the changes though. --doncram 23:33, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi there doncram!
- I was a little uncertain about the location tag in the NRHP infobox, as many Alaskan articles were containing the information. The Template:Infobox NRHP clearly states that location should be just the city (or to use the nearest_city tag when not inside a town). I've worked on all Alabama NRHP listings and almost none of the articles contained the address in the location line, which was normally mentioned in the article (when important) or just in the NRHP general listing page. Moreover the address is always present, and therefore reachable, in the NRHP paper. I've uniformed to that "standard" and corrected those articles which were not compliant. Thank you for getting in touch, will double check everything and review NRHP listing guidelines in the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places.
- ProprioMe OW (talk) 07:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)]
- @ProprioMe OW (talk) 21:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)]
- @
- Wow, thank you for going ahead and opening discussion at wt:NRHP and getting this resolved and getting back to me! I was dragging because I figured perhaps I should in fact open a discussion there and get others to weigh in but not liking that because it would seem negative for you like i was hauling you to some awful review panel. Good eye you have for what is written in guidance at the NRHP infobox instructions. The discussion should lead to that being changed. I agree with another one or two editors there who leave the address info (or add it) in the location field, and often/usually don't mention it in the actual text of the article, considering it to be dry infobox stuff. Thanks, hugely! --doncram 02:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)]
- Wow, thank you for going ahead and opening discussion at
Hey, i have noticed your improving coordinates info in NRHP articles in Alaska and perhaps elsewhere. I presume you are using Google satellite view or some other means to get better coordinates. I presume you are updating coordinates both in the list-articles and the individual articles when those exist. To take a tiny bit of credit for yourself, and to help in future cleanup/review of all the coordinates, could you possibly please indicate yourself as a source within the {{
- @ProprioMe OW (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)]
- Great! If you do, you will be in advance of most NRHP editors. Unfortunately we did not pay attention to this early on; all of the original entries using NRIS should have been marked with that as a source, but now we cannot tell which has been improved vs. not. i only learned about the source option within {{wt:NRHP to come back to the issue. Note that per what I suggest further there, that in the NRHP list-articles, you should add a "coordsource=ProprioMeOW" row following the latitude= and longitude= rows. Please do comment there if you like, and we'll see if there are any refinements suggested. What I am suggesting now is considerably streamlined from the best i could come up with in some previous discussions. --doncram 22:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)]
- Great! If you do, you will be in advance of most NRHP editors. Unfortunately we did not pay attention to this early on; all of the original entries using NRIS should have been marked with that as a source, but now we cannot tell which has been improved vs. not. i only learned about the source option within {{
May 2017
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Pilgrim 100-B N709Y, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 00:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- To wt:NRHP#footnoting coordinates. It was new style attribution, but proper, by editor ProprioMe OW. I am concerned that it looks to you like vandalism or a test edit. I am not sure how to proceed right now, in terms of marking it differently somehow or educating editors somehow or what, so that edits like this don't look bad to others. I edited there following BilCat to restore the attribution, though maybe my change did not fully revert their change. --doncram 02:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)]
- @ProprioMe OW (talk) 10:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)]
- @
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, ProprioMe OW. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
userpage option
Hey, as you know
- Hi ProprioMe OW (talk) 21:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC)]
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you for creating Southern University Historic District!Zigzig20s (talk) 18:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC) |
A page you started (Jean Baptiste Thibodaux House) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jean Baptiste Thibodaux House, ProprioMe OW!
Wikipedia editor Mahveotm just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you!
To reply, leave a comment on Mahveotm's
Learn more about
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, ProprioMe OW. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)