User talk:Purin128AL

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"March of the Volunteers" is not the official national anthem of Hong Kong from 1997.

Basic Law and the Law of Hong Kong didn‘t define what song will be the national anthem of Hong Kong from 1997 as Hong Kong is running the “one country two system” rule. This has not be change even China make an amendment to the Annex III of the Basic Law in 2018 & the subseqence implemtn of the national anthem law.

Those law only require Hongkonger respect to the “National Anthem of People Republic of China”, there are no define "March of the Volunteers" will become or is the national anthem of Hong Kong.

Thus, until now, there do not have any offical national anthem of Hong Kong. Please change it back to the correct description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.166.22 (talk) 16:28, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Melbourne Airport railway station, Melbourne

A tag has been placed on

section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion

, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

ThylacineHunter (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In line with the vline listing, only transport within metro Melbourne is listed out (or the whole vline network will need to be included)

For the Geelong―Melbourne ferry I will simply all into Geelong―Portarlington―Melbourne if that works? And I also I followed the PTV page so I put Melbourne instead of Docklands Purin128AL (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the Geelong―Portarlington―Melbourne routes are unlikely to be turned into separate articles I'm happy to display it as one route, although I would maybe swap the order of Melbourne and Geelong to match the route diagrams on Transport in Melbourne#Ferries and Port Phillip Ferries (which also needs to swap navbox to regional Victoria). -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A current discussion may be of interest to you about merging the

It is now possible to create a diagram for the layout of Southern Cross Station. I have submitted a request for BSicons for platform numbers needed for this station and there now are a full set for both "A" & "B" so it will be possible to combine the letters with numbers to produce the relevant platform numbers needed (1, 2A-8A, 2B-8B, 8S, 9-14, 15A-16A, 15B-16B). -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 04:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Although the main reason I haven't done it is because the layout is way too complicated + time consuming and I do not want to leave out any sidings. I'm quite busy with uni work recently so I'll complete the layout for the rest of the network when I have time. Purin128AL (talk) 04:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually unaware you had been doing the line route maps until today and have been updating them as HoHo3143 has been updating the pages to be good articles. I have, at the moment, removed reference in the diagrams to grade separations awaiting further research into how best to display them without making the route maps too confusing or too long. Also whether to just show on the service and not on the physical track. These thing will be clarified by the new section regarding a standard for the diagrams. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've only been creating track layout diagrams, but not the route ones. I do think level crossings should not be included in the route diagrams, but elevated/trenched sections should be included. Route diagrams should stay simple.

So for track diagrams I would include most rail infrastructures: elevated, trench, bridge over rivers/bridges over roads, demolished stations with certain structures stil intact, rail yards/depots, level crossings, intersection with freeways, track gauges, electrification and platforms.

For Southern Cross I'm thinking a way to indicate which tracks are electrified, which are not, which are std/dual/broad gauges which might make it very complicated. Purin128AL (talk) 06:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Dual gauge: On my own website, I have been using some of my own versions of the BSicons for track layouts (easiest way I've found to make custom complex layouts). I selected to show dual gauge as a "teal" like set of icons. This is something that we could uses on here. I've also realised there will occasionally be a need for a 2nd colour for narrow gauge as there are some locations on the 2ft 6in Victorian narrow system that also had an interchange with a 2ft or 3ft 'tramway', for these I have currently selected "ochre" although I am open to other suggestions.
• Elevated/trenched sections: I do agree that they are better suited to Physical track instead of Service diagrams, but there is a potential for the Physical track to cause issues in locations there there is a former railway junction to a closed line originally at ground level that has now been rebuilt as either elevated or lowered track. The Service diagram does not have this potential problem as there are only stations shown.

-- ThylacineHunter (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only stations without service I included in track layout is only General Motors as it has useable platforms intact, and Pakenham East/East Pakenham whatever it is called as it will be there in 2024. For other grade seperations I've just decided to remove them as they can be seen nowhere from a train. Examples include the new Union station track layout and Pakenham line skyrail where I just update every time a new section is built. Purin128AL (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victorian Tertiary Admissions Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hey, hope you are well. I have tagged Unique Student Identifier with notability issues. Please can you address? I was on the fence because it's useful but it does not appear to meet GNG. If tag not addressed, I may need to draft this. Thanks. MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added multiple secondary sources that addresses the article and referenced them. Does that address the notability? A few of them are considered from reliable sources as per

WP:RSP Purin128AL (talk) 09:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Look great now . -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haha sorry for making you revert my stuff, I was doing the redirect class thing on autopilot. Also, thanks for all of your work on railway articles in Australia! Fork99 (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is currently a proposal for an Australian Transport WikiProject. I thought you may be interested due to your edits and interests in transport in Australia. The proposal can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport. If you are interested, add yourself to the Support section of the page. Thank you! Fork99 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits like this one are causing Linter errors to appear in articles (click on Page information to see them). Please stop making these edits until you can perform them without causing Linter errors, and revert or fix the edits that you have made so far. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to make the same comment Jonesey95 made. —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link to discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits soon when I have access to a windows computer with AWB. Will discuss at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport then consider the what amount of information are appropriate in station infoboxes. Purin128AL (talk) 05:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could you do a small favour for me please (I don’t have AWB yet): could you have a look here (Special:WhatLinksHere/Public transport in Dunedin) and change all of those links to Public transport in the Otago Region? Appreciate it, Fork99 (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no worries I've changed all links now. Purin128AL (talk) 04:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Purin128AL. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]