User talk:Pushbutton auto

Welcome!

Hello, Pushbutton auto, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Please take some lessons at WP:Sandbox. You not only broke the link to Willie Neilson, but also buggered up another to Gordon Neilson.--MacRusgail (talk) 10:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, someone buggered it all up with those STUPID redirections.

The players name is WALTER GORDON NEILSON not Gordon Neilson.

and Willie NEILSON, what a crock of sh* , I thought nicknames were extra, their proper names should never be overuled/redirected.

and his brother is ROBERT THOMSON NEILSON, not Robert Neilson.

I am gonna get all those redirections reversed and get those biographies rewritten correctly.

Pushbutton auto (talk) 10:50, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 06:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article George Thomson (shipbuilder) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability other than he started a shipbuilding firm - there's no article on that firm and I can't find sources on either firm or person. My feeling is that neither are notable enough for an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 18:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I fat fingered rollback and you edited before I could revert.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  02:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Pushbutton auto. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bain family murders. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 14:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pushbutton auto. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pushbutton auto. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Your remark has been reverted. OrewaTel (talk) 01:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just stopping by because I wanted to say pretty much the same. And given that you've had issues with this kind of behaviour before, maybe it's time for you to consider some self-moderation. Schwede66 05:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]