User talk:Rabauter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rabauter (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you unblock me, I will no longer troll and will contribute to Wikipedias sucsess. Please forgive me and I am sorry. I am ready to be constructive now. --Rabauter (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC) Rabauter (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no indication that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Level 4
Level 4

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[viewpurgeupdate]


4.00 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 18:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Tz'utujil people has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG
.

Thank you.

talk) 20:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Tz'utujil people with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Warriorluz. BethNaught (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Post

I'd appreciate if you didn't claim to be an admin when this is not the case. Thanks, GABHello! 20:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also appreciate it you didn't egg on vandals. GABHello! 20:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On Adminship

WP:TROPHY. Impersonating an admin as your first few edits means you are nowhere close to it, and if you continue to do so you will likely be blocked. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

DYK

Rabauter, you act like you are an inexperienced new editor but, somehow, in your first hour of editing, you find your way to Template talk:Did you know which a new editor would not know about. Please do not troll this website. For an account that has been active an hour, you are not getting off to a great start. Liz Read! Talk! 21:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. --Rabauter (talk) 21:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Sockpuppet investigation

Dr. K. 21:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am a sock of User:MURICA4LIFE. I admit it. --Rabauter (talk) 21:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What about Warriorluz? Dr. K. 21:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah sure why not. --Rabauter (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to bed as I am tired. Goodnight Wikifriends. Let me know how the sockpuppet inquest goes. Write me a postcard. --Rabauter (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]