User talk:Raintheone/Archive 3

Okay, it'll be delivered. :) Thanks.

Thanks for this contribution to free knowledge Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, sorry I haven't been in touch for a week or so, i've been on holiday. I'm back now and ready to get down to work with the articles. Anyways, how are you doing and is there anything that you think needs doing?--AcidBrights (talk) 10:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You archived the last section, before I got a chance to mention this. But the Neighbours news section on the new site is up to thirteen pages and counting, so we have news items from late 2010 now. I've been correcting some links as I go along, but there isn't a real hurry. The last time I looked, H&A only had six pages of news items, but you might want to check to see if any of Nicole's refs are now available. There's also a couple of Liam interviews that would be good for his page. Oh, Susan K's image has now been changed and updated by the user who edit warred with you. It's not bad, but I'm sure you could have done better. :) - JuneGloom Talk 14:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! I changed the Nicole links last week - thankfully they restored the plot dread one. News of The World website went down, but I don't think they really reported on Neighbours. Btw, what are you using for Work and Publisher fields when citing the new Channel 5 site?RaintheOne ^BAM 14:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember seeing any news about Neighbours in the NOTW and we haven't got any links in the articles. I'm putting Channel 5 in the work field and Northern & Shell in the publisher for now. - JuneGloom Talk 15:47, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I think someone objected to your Summer image - [6]. - JuneGloom Talk 17:06, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lol they must have though the code they used would make the image show up. More so their mentality is laughable, how tiny was that image, would have looked stupid streched out. BTW I think the quality of Sooz's image is too fine, and the image name is wrong. I guess I'll just have to find a new one. A better one. ^_^RaintheOne ^BAM 17:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any news on it, you said last week, yet nothing has happened...

I did ask again. Maybe you should ask this time.RaintheOne ^BAM 17:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, how?

Mario 15:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Well I asked over the DS forum. RaintheOne ^BAM 15:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Youve done a lot. Thnaks. :) Can I have a link?

Mario 15:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

No. It's not really fair to post a person's profile here. Just wait, I'll ask again in a day or two. She may get annoyed, you have to build a rapport as pictures with stars are kind of like prized possesions. I did a thread on it to see and chose the people who were the most friendly... one told me to get lost... lolRaintheOne ^BAM 15:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have this home-made pie as an apology for forgetting about the News of the world website :-) Talk! 19:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Your edits, especially to Hollyoaks and EastEnders articles are always worthwhile edits and I envy you for that. :) Mario 17:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

A wiki love message? For Rain? This proves he's your favourite Mario! U never send me pictures of mugs of beer!!!! We're over!!! GunGagdin^Moan 21:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raintheone. Yes, I remember you. And yes, I will probably be editing some soap opera articles this time around too. Could you please give my some feedback for my changes to the Alf Roberts article? And maybe also some suggestions for further improvement? Dodgechris (talk • contributions) 22:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback and advice. Sorry I took a long time to reply my Internet has been down this week! Dodgechris (talk • contributions) 15:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the ref that's great! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 07:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i've done some improvement to Leanne Holiday's article. Would you be okay to have a look at it and check it over for me, that would be great thanks. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks about the article. I was just wondering would you say that the Lee, Leanne and Amy storyline was just Leanne becoming obsessed and a rivalry or would you say it was a love triangle. Because I thought it was just the rivalry, but seeing the recent ds interview with Alex Carter there was references that it is a love triangle. But to be honest, I don't think it is a love triangle, thats not the way I look at it. What do you think though?--AcidBrights (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I made the edits to

You can't archive something that no longer exists. - JuneGloom Talk 15:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So for this link [7] we can never get it now?

Mario 15:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Digitalspy reported on that :)RaintheOne ^BAM 15:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it now :) Do you like the article?

Mario 15:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I've just looked at it. Much better I have to say, very pleased - I think there may have been something on the love square in Inside Soap. As you may have noticed, from the storyline update, in this weeks episodes it was discovered Ethan had been seeing Rae Wilson aswell.

Okay, so I thought I would start a new section as it could get quite long. I have been looking on the Hollyoaks character list and do you think we should discuss whether some new articles should be created or not? The characters i've been thinking we should discuss are Doug, Jamil, Ethan, Ruby, Esther and Pete.--AcidBrights (talk) 13:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jamil should not as he hasn't had his own storyline apart from the blink and you miss Lanika thing. Which didn't get that much coverage. Esther has nothing really. Ethan, Ruby and Pete are the ones with the most potential for an article.RaintheOne ^BAM 15:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree with you. But do you think we should be thinking about creating them yet or wait a bit longer?--AcidBrights (talk) 15:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a good idea to add some more info to the lists for now. Pete is going to get involved with Amy so there may be more info on him then. Maybe do a test on Ethan to see how much info we can get for him atm.RaintheOne ^BAM 16:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thats a good idea.--AcidBrights (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, i've just got one more question. Do you think Diane O'Connor's storylines should contain about sinead and bart and her banning them from seeing each other. I think it should be as the character has been involved throughout.--AcidBrights (talk) 17:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure, anything Diane goes through and there is sources, add it.RaintheOne ^BAM 17:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raintheone. You have new messages at Causa sui's talk page.
Message added 19:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

causa sui (talk) 19:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raintheone. You have new messages at Dodgechris's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dodgechris (talk • contributions) 22:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raintheone. You have new messages at Dodgechris's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dodgechris (talk • contributions) 13:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raintheone. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

Mario 14:17, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Okay. ;)RaintheOne ^BAM 17:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Raintheone. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

Mario 17:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

GA review of Mavis Wilton

Just in case you're not watching it, I believe there are four outstanding issues that need to be dealt with before this article can be listed as a GA. I've listed them

Fatuorum 20:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Inside Soap

Hey Rain, I'm sorry for pretty much disappearing on you last month (it's been a painfully busy summer). I do keep chipping away at the Sahira draft, and the list of unused sources is slowly starting to look far less mammoth. In case you didn't guess from the section header, I've come to be cheeky and ask if you could possibly scan/photograph an Inside Soap interview if you have it :).

Lulu Hutchison, and I've mentioned my concern about the notability guidelines, but I know there was a full page interview with the actress in the 19 July issue of Inside Soap. So if you have that, it would be really brilliant if you could drop it on the talk page whenever you have the time. Of course, no worries if not! And I don't know whether you noticed, but I dropped a few sources off at Dan Hamilton—couple of which are probably useless, but one is a really useful, insightful interview with Astill on Dan's sexuality and creation, which was a nice find. Frickative 14:30, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Oliver Valentine.jpg

A tag has been placed on

section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria

. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the

non-free fair use in

|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Warfieldian ^(talk) 17:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shows I Watch

Ok the file naming is good to know for the future. Regarding shows I watch.... Shows I watch avidly;

• Holby City
• Grey's Anatomy
• House (TV series)
• Breaking Bad
• Entourage
• Desperate Housewives
• Weeds
• The Office (U.S. TV series)
• Bones (TV series)
• Sirens (UK TV series)
• The Inbetweeners
• Damages
• Downton Abbey (I actually wouldnt mind starting a Downton Abbey project, I'm actually quite surprised no one else has)
• Two and a half Men

Shows I used to watch before they were cancelled or came to an end;

• Prison Break
• Brothers & Sisters (2006 TV series)
• The West Wing
• Friends
• Band of Brothers

(if I think of anything else I shall add it) --InExcelsis DeoTalk 19:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hollyoaks

Hey, just to let you know i've revamped Diane O'Connor's article. It took some time but it was worth it, I really like it. Anyways, I was wondering if you could please check over it to make sure there isn't any mistakes and such. Thanks :)--AcidBrights (talk) 15:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W&L

Keep hold of any character refs you find and we can think about creating some articles for the girls. I've already started a Jenny one offline and I have a great TV Week article for the Bec/Doug/Sophie triangle (which also mentions the other girls' relationships too). I think we might need to find some reception for the main article, as it's looking a bit bare at the moment. - JuneGloom Talk 23:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great, will do. I hope there is info about on Sophie's stalker plot. Would reception like the telegraph calling Vallejo the standout actress be of any use to the article?RaintheOne ^BAM 23:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if we had the full copy of this interview - [8]RaintheOne ^BAM 23:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also 'The Age' is our reception hero. [9] April 12 review has great Jenny reception. (That is if you haven't already read them all :p )RaintheOne ^BAM 01:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there was anything about Sophie's stalker, it mainly focused on Bec and Doug getting together. Think I'll have to buy this weeks TV Week though - look at the cover. I think you can add the info about Vallejo. I'll have a look for that copy of OK!, I did notice it when I was gathering sources for Jenny. Btw, have you seen/read the official W&L presskit - [10]? - JuneGloom Talk 13:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that is a hero! How do we archive that? I've downloaded it for safe keeping. How would you set the ref out for that? No wait! I have more questions. David Knox's review [11] and Author/Journo Karen Brooks's review [12] - would you use them?RaintheOne ^BAM 13:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also because I'm such a dizzy kinda guy - I don't get this article I want to use. [13] - I think he is ripping into Jenny, but is he praising her in parts or just being mean? The first paragraph about the show having relatable characters is what I want to use. But it made me think, is he being sarcastic about that or not?RaintheOne ^BAM 13:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I used the presskit as a reference in Dylan Timmins' article. I think you can use the two reviews, but be careful with Brooks' one. She's made a couple of mistakes in it, like confusing Frances and Bec. As for the SMH article, the writer is being quite sarcastic throughout and he's basically saying Jenny is a cliche fat girl and the writers have stuck to the rules, so to speak, in her portrayal (unlike the writers of The Vicar of Dibley). - JuneGloom Talk 14:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) What would I do without you.RaintheOne ^BAM 15:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review for Nicole Franklin

Hi, I saw that the article

Boeing/Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 06:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm sorry but I don't think I'll be able too. I don't have enough spare time atm, maybe if any are there in the future I'll take a look - keep up the good work though, looks great. :).RaintheOne ^BAM 02:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interviews

Hiya. I know this is a really big ask and if you dont want to do it thats totally fine, but I was wondering if you could email me some scans of interviews involving the Silas storyline? Mainly ones for the Texas (January 2011) Jenny (April 2011) plots if thats ok. Any interviews that Jeff has down or anybody else involved in it would be great.--AcidBrights (talk) 12:06, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure I'll hunt them down tomorrow, might take a bit because I'll have to find my old disk to install my scanner to my new comp. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 02:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) --AcidBrights (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've found five things of use. I'll need your email then. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 20:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, how do you want me to give you it?--AcidBrights (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh does JuneGloom have it? She could just message it me if you prefer it not be visable here. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 12:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just upload them online and link you it's easier..RaintheOne ^BAM 13:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• "Silas Stalks Lynsey!" is from Inside Soap issue 32, 13 - 19 Aug 2011, page 24.
• "Lynsey In Danger" is from inside soap issue 31, 6-12 Aug, page 14 and written by Laura-Jayne Tylor.
• "Jenny's Deadly Date" is from Inside Soap issue 16, 23 - 29 April 2011, page 26.
• "Will Lynsey kill Silas?" is from Inside Soap issue 10, 12 - 18 March 2011, page 18 and is written by Laura-Jayne Tylor.
• "Silas Strikes Again!" is from Inside Soap issue 9, 5-11 March 2011, page 24.
• "Texas beds Doug!" is from Inside Soap issue 4, 29 Jan - 4 Feb 2011, page 27.

Link - [14] Tell me when You've D/L'd it and I can remove it. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 14:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ive downloaded them. Thank you so much, I really do appreciate it. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 14:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miles

Where did you disappear to? I've completed a Miles/Leah section, shall I add it to the sandbox? I also found an interview with Josh Quong Tart that has some great characterisation info in it, which I've already added. - JuneGloom Talk 22:54, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here. :) I was watching TV and forgot to check your reply. :p Yes add it for sure.RaintheOne ^BAM 23:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'll re-word it and add a similar section to Leah's article sometime this week. - JuneGloom Talk 23:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll add some tomorrow or tonight depending how long I stay up. Gonna watch W&L in a bit though. I was going to have the last three eps for one go, but when I showed my sister that TV week cover saying "Shock exit" - she said otherwise. lolRaintheOne ^BAM 23:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just had to say, I loved this edit summary - [15] - JuneGloom Talk 15:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you've seen, but this week's Inside Soap has an interview with Chelsea Halfpenny. She talks about her audition for Amy. - JuneGloom Talk 20:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silas

I'm doing improvements to his article in my sandbox and I am a bit confused about what to do when it comes to names in development section. In India Longford's murder section, all of the sources either mention Silas as 'Cameron' or 'attacker' so what should I put when i'm writing about what happens in development section?--AcidBrights (talk) 07:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get this message?--AcidBrights (talk) 08:17, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice sorry. So I would think as it is from Silas' point of view you would just stay with Silas in each instance. Though like in India's article, Cameron would be used up until the point of her murder.RaintheOne ^BAM 13:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Though obviously it needs saying India thought he was Cameron, in Silas' article. I guesss you knew that though. :pRaintheOne ^BAM 13:50, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this.--AcidBrights (talk) 16:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know I love it too, and i've seen that video i'm so intrigued and excited, its going to be thrilling. I tell you Jeff (Silas) and Karen (Lynsey) are amazing, i've been on the edge of my seat! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Just a quick request that I'm making to you and June, if you come across vandalism on Ray Meagher's page, could you please let me know so I can see if it needs to be deleted from the public archives? I've just had to remove some stuff regarding an incident on a social networking site.--5 albert square (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sure will do. Thanks also for moving the Misfits characters around. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 17:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neighbours, Series Overview Table.

Hey Rain,

How are you, just wondering what are you thoughts on making a series overview table for Neighbours, eg: Seasons, episode count, season return, finale dates, and what network/ time slot they have been.... Just want to run by you first, see what you think. B.Davis2003 (talk) 07:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I'm not sure that will really help the general reader though. As it is an encyclopedia, that sort of thing is usually home on a fansite, letting fans know when the series is returning and ending.. etc.. Also I think it would be list cruft, there is already enough material on Neighbours. So I don't think it is a good idea. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 14:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LC is where it is explained. ;)RaintheOne ^BAM 14:11, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:IINFO would also apply. - JuneGloom Talk 14:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Help

I'm taking you up on your offer, and would appreciate some help in keeping an eye on

talk) 20:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I think there's some definite sock activity on the Téa article. You may need to start an SPI. - JuneGloom Talk 20:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Were on it. ;)RaintheOne ^BAM 21:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to check back here and say thank you guys. I just had to revert a user on the Trevor St. John article. I believe this is a sockpuppet of Dane97. It appears that no matter how many times we block him, he will keep returning as a new user.

Whether it's him or another person, I must say that I do not understand how people can act as though St. John never portrayed Todd Manning simply because his character was revealed as an impostor.

talk) 22:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

They've just had a free run on articles for long time, so I guess they think poorly written articles are the norm. Almost everyone but a select few know the importance of citing their sources too. It shows on Todd's talk that they think anything can have an article.. As for the IP, we'll keep a close eye on them. If Dane did continue to sock, there is a number of avenues that can be taken to ensure it stops. It depends on the status of his actual IP though. I've added St. John to my ever growing watchlist. :PRaintheOne BAM 22:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's frustrating. This is what I was telling you about American editors who edit soap opera articles here. Not sure if you guys have the same problem to this extent with British soap opera articles. Thank you again.

talk) 01:15, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

We still do - just not to the same extent as it used to be. Victor's article has been created again by an IP hopper. Though nothing can be done to prevent them at this time. I've added more characters to the other table, but I'm taking it slow. lolRaintheOne ^BAM 01:34, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 02:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

LOL, I requested full-protection without knowing that it's already on semi-protection. I overlooked that it was semi-protected, since I could edit it and didn't notice a lock at the right-hand corner. I thought it'd been full-protected and figured that wore off. You could have told me it was already protected so that I wouldn't have looked silly, LOL.

talk) 23:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Ha - Sorry, I misread your comment. I assumed you wanted full protection incase registered users kept reverting. Atleast the activity's died down a little. Though Tea is off full protection so we may need to keep a watchful eye there. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 23:15, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did want full-protection, but I didn't know the article was already semi-protected. That's why I was declined -- already semi-protected. The administrator said to give that a try first. As I'm sure you already know, since you're watching the article, Todd Manning is off full-protection as well. So, yeah, we definitely need to be ready for more of the same disruption at both articles.

talk) 23:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Re: Editing Tea Delgado

I understand what you're saying about boxes being cluttered, however, I don't believe that what I changed or removed was cluttering the box, I've read guidelines for that template used, and it specifies that labels shouldn't be used unless actually needed, which is why I removed the label "daughter" from her daughter's name, I also removed the additional two step-children, because Tea isn't married to Todd, she's married to Victor, which means Starr & Jack aren't her step-children. When it comes to marriages, all I did was make the font smaller, I don't think that was cluttering the box. From the looks of it, the box looks more cluttered now then it did when I made those minore changes.--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 05:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Amy Wyatt

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! I did suggest a different hook myself, but perhaps you will have a better one to suggest. Sharktopus ^talk 18:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

To Answer Your Question...

Yes, I will be working on the article and won't abandon it like I did with the 1985 character list. And every time I've put up perfectly credible sources in the past it's come into question and been ultimately removed. And as 5 Albert Square and June suggested I may just move this back to the userspace after a realisation. I thought I could bnag it out quicker than I could. Conquistador2k6 23 August 2011 12:46 (UTC)

Hollyoaks

Hello, Raintheone. You have new messages at AcidBrights's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I kinda hoped it would be a discussion on my talkpage, so would you be able to reply to my message. Thanks :)--AcidBrights (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"A Tale of Two Todds" - Don't go all Jane Austen on us here

LOL!!!! I got a nice chuckle out of that edit summary. Thank you!!

talk) 23:09, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Bye!

		The Special Barnstar
		You were one of my best friends on this wiki, not becasue you believed in me, just because you were nice. And for 1 final time --> ;) <-- ^___^ Mario 13:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

It is a shame that you leave. Oh Maz. What if we never hear from you ever again. :(RaintheOne ^BAM 14:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

but you can- DS Forums? :) I'll come in now and again if you just email me! I'll be on hand say a Wikipedia

Mario 14:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Oh and remember HEATHER CHASEN...!!![reply

]

After all the winks Mario gave you, I had hoped that something was blossoming! I bought a hat for the wedding and everything. You will now be the wikipedia love story that never was :( It's like Wuthering Heights....GunGagdin^Moan 14:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No really. I'm not. :) It's a complete accident (my keyboards dodgy).

Mario 14:16, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

My hopes have been dashed. :(RaintheOne ^BAM 16:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Hello Raintheone! I hope you accept this brownie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 21:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Random, but thanks, it was really tasty. =)RaintheOne ^BAM 21:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History of Hollyoaks

Hi i noticed the page is in a bad state and although the sources seem to be there it needs a rewrite. I know we agreed to try to work on character articles on HO but i was wondering if you'd be interested in helping editing it to a better state. If you're too busy any advice would be welcome as i really have no idea where to start. Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Amy Wyatt

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

HO

Hey, just seen that Ricky's staying in Hollyoaks, i'm glad he's staying because he works well with Bart, Jason etc. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 09:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again, I was wondering if I could ask you to have a look at Silas's article in my sandbox to see what you think as I need an opinion on the fued with lynsey section as there is a lot of info. Thanks--AcidBrights (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for those scans. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emmerdale character articles; invitation to discussion

I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

In regards to the above, do you fancy collaborating on a couple of characters at some point? I really want to tackle Holly Barton and Lisa Dingle (and eventaully Charity and Chas), who are you interested in? - JuneGloom Talk 17:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to post there in a second. From your suggestions Holly will be an easy one to complete because she's fairly new and the amount of info from the Barton's creation and her druggie plot. One I've been looking at before this was Laurel. Do you watch Emmerdale btw?RaintheOne ^BAM 17:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do watch the show, though it's not my favourite. I am worried that we maybe the only editors who are willing to do anything about the problem. I don't think we can improve all the articles by ourselves and keep up with the articles already on our watchlists/to-do lists. - JuneGloom Talk 17:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I watched it up until 2007 and it went downhill. I watched it when Aaron came out for about two months, but most of the characters were still boring. I watch it on and off now on ITV 2, because Hollyoaks is on at 7 on E4. :p So I'll probably be more interested in improving older characters. I bet we are the only two aswell! I'll ask AC and Danny if they fancy helping. I used to concentrate on HO/Neighbours .. then Home and Away crept in, I started helping Corrie again, bits and bobs for EE... Helping One life to live... now Emmerdale. Aside from this i have to watch H&A, Neighbours, EE, Corrie and Hollyoaks everyday! I'll have no life. LOLRaintheOne ^BAM 17:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've watched the show for years, though I admit I have gotten bored of it. I keep looking at the cast list and changing my mind about who to help first. I also keep wondering whether the newer characters should be improved first, since it'll be easier to find sources for them? I know what you mean about having no life! - JuneGloom Talk 18:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have mail, btw. - JuneGloom Talk 22:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 23:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One more! - JuneGloom Talk 15:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you've started with Laurel. I'm gonna start with the Bartons (Holly first, then Adam). - JuneGloom Talk 19:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Miles Copeland (Home and Away)

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

I've copied those storylines onto Mercedes article for you both. Hope they are okay. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just perfecto =] RaintheOne ^BAM 15:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	Just wanted to say a big thanks for fixing up the citations at the Red or Black? article - they're in a much better shape now due to your efforts! Miyagawa (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou. Always happy to help. =)RaintheOne ^BAM 15:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi was wondering if you could do me a favour if you get a chance. If you get a few minutes would you be able to look in the Hollyoaks book you mentioned to see if it has anything written about Louise Taylor? I'm trying to expand her but can only find two sources for her atm. If you don't have time it's fine :)D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Regarding the page move for Natasha Williams, I'm not sure that would be possible. There is already a page there of that name, even if the other person is not that notable we can't just delete her from the encyclopedia. What we can do is move her to another page name, set up a disambiguation page at Natasha Williams and have the Neighbours character stay where she is? If you want me to do that please let me know, however, I'm currently not very active during the week owing to working 11 hour shifts most days so it may be next weekend before I can do anything--5 albert square (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Naah it's fine. There should be a disam for these though - given that for some odd reason the clearly notable American actress has no article - that should be created. I was obviously aware about what we can do.. Just happens that I think that is unfair.RaintheOne ^BAM 22:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way User:Theunknownnun has been back, this time under User:Crystalnite, am sure they're the same!!--5 albert square (talk) 01:12, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. They were so disruptive with these file uploads.RaintheOne ^BAM 01:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you removed loads of unsourced villains from the list. I was wondering if you could do me a favour and list all the ones you removed on User:AnemoneProjectors/Villains, as I didn't want to lose any names in case I could find sources in the future. I was checking for sources before removing names as well - once I had gone through the whole list I was going to go for FL status! So if you have time, I'd appreciate that. I'd do it myself but I don't think I do have the time right now :( –anemoneprojectors– 10:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it yeah. If I find any sources I'll remove them from the list. Beware some of the american ones are probably the good guys. There are supercouple articles for characters that have only looked at each other sweet. I wouldn't put it past half of those additions being added because the characters have slapped another one.RaintheOne ^BAM 02:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. When I first saw the list, Gail Robinson was on it for marrying Paul Robinson twice. Lyn was also on there because she ruined Rebecca and Paul's wedding and Hilary was there because she ruined Paul's wedding to Gail! [16] - JuneGloom Talk 12:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OMG! I cannot believe that list had Gail in it! I do worry sometimes that those adding the info really believe it themselves.RaintheOne ^BAM 12:47, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a big difference between doing bad things and being a villain! Michael and Yusef in EE are definite villains because they're sly and manipulative but I don't think Max Branning is one... he's listed as one because he was nominated for some award but I think he's only there for the affair with Stacey! So yeah, some people are definitely there for the wrong reasons! Definitely needed to get rid of all the unsourced ones. Thanks. –anemoneprojectors– 14:02, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that!!! –anemoneprojectors– 13:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick request from me :)

See if you come across any socks of User:Theunknownnun could you please request checkuser when filing the SPI? Just every single time we come across a sock with this user we also seem to find sleepers!

One of the sleepers Checkuser found on the last request uploaded the image to Jacqueline Jossa's page. I asked HJ Mitchell to take a look at the image and he's in agreement with me - he thinks it looks like a copyvio. I googled it before and I did find it on websites like Facebook, am starting to think that the editor simply copied and pasted the image from there and wrongly uploaded it on Commons giving it a false certificate to say it's free when it's not. I've asked him to look and see if the editor that uploaded the image to Commons is related to the one that actually added it to the article.

• Sighs and shakes head*--5 albert square (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure - I'll remember to do that. You know what, I've always wondered about that image actually. It really looks like a personal photo and not a member of the publics.RaintheOne ^BAM 00:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah me too, I just assumed she had given permission for it. To me it looks like an image that would belong maybe to whichever agency she's with. It looks too posed, like she's purposely taken the time to pose for it. That to me smacks of an image that would belong to an agency or the media. Thought it was best to get a second opinion on the image from someone that doesn't know Jac Jossa or EastEnders lol and best to play safe rather than have the risk of JJ sue us for copyright!!--5 albert square (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could have anoter check off Silas's article in my sandbox, just to see what you think so far, I know i'm taking a long time on it, but I want it to be really good and want to make sure nothing is wrong or unsuitable. Thanks--AcidBrights (talk) 18:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your comments thats a big help, and thank you for the scan aswell. Thanks about the Leyla article, I may need some scans soon, but not yet, if thats okay with you. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i've just remembered that I needed to ask you something. How can I swap Jenny and Lynsey around without being mixed up so to speak?--AcidBrights (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--AcidBrights (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you but the Darren/Nancy interview was actually an article about Tyler Moon :P Think you uploaded the wrong one, do you have the other?D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, I was shocked at Rae's murder, well played by Alice and Jeff! I was just wondering now with the whole Brendan/Rae thing now involved with Silas how should I manage the sections should I have a section which says 'Feud with Brendan Brady' and mention the Rae and Lynsey stuff because its going to be confusing.--AcidBrights (talk) 17:09, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So basically do a Rae Wilson's murder section and write about all the later stuff and theresa just add it about rae more, than do i put Lynsey's storyline from this week under the section and brendan yes?--AcidBrights (talk) 17:36, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help--AcidBrights (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any links for sayin Theresa doesn't get murdered and Rae did (apart from DS interview) cos I want to get them together before I start writing anything.--AcidBrights (talk) 09:17, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just read your message from April (has it really been that long?!) Sorry I've not been so active, I've been so busy and usually just edit without signing in these days. I'm determined to help though, some of the Corrie articles are horrendously out of date! Alex250P (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was this the interview you meant? How would i go about quoting it etc? Tbh not much in the way of sources for her appearance so should we remove on image?D4nnyw14 (talk) 19:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should Kyle's temporary departure have its own section in development or would you put the info in casting? - JuneGloom Talk 16:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I usually include that sort of stuff in the casting, when the info is minimal. Though, If you are including his accident, announcing his temp departure, anything on Dane filling his place, then his evenutal return to work. Then I'd say that would give it a good stand alone section.RaintheOne ^BAM 16:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha, thanks. I also changed my mind a few times. I might see if I can expand the casting info a bit more and then move the temp departure info down. I'm currently working on a family section for Natasha's article, I want to get that added before her aunt appears. Have you seen Darren Stark's article? The whole casting section is based on two refs from fansites. It has to go. Looks like we'll have to stick the article on our to-do lists. ;) - JuneGloom Talk 22:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder.. who on earth added those fansites.. lol I always fancied doing his article. I like the Stark family. The weird thing is I always think I've revamped Cheryl's article, until I click it and go "Oh yeah, must have forgot about that." I bet there is something in the fairfax archive for those. I'll look probably tomorrow now though. :) Btw, trying to get a free Roz image because they havent got a Holly one. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 01:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added it to Holly's article, but you may want to move it or change my generic caption. lolRaintheOne ^BAM 02:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, well i've been watching Days of our Lives since early August, and I love it, so i've been watching past episodes, and got up to date on past/present and future storylines. Some time soon I will start editing the character articles as some of them are really poor and i am starting to gather info about each character so I have a lot to use when I do start.--AcidBrights (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, well i'm hoping that there will be no problems. Yeah, Chloe has been forced into prostitution recently and John's returning soon. Stefano is always brilliant.--AcidBrights (talk) 15:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, i've seen it looks good. Sorry i'm taking so long on Silas's article, but I just want to make it perfect. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 15:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For all you're amazing work on the Hollyoaks articles and how helpful you've been to me since i've started. You're also really helpful with adding sources and images to articles and are just generally really helpful so thanks :) D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to have to bother you, again, but would it need to be sourced for Darren wearing fake tan even though it had explicitly been stated in episodes before hand cos all i can find is sources for the tanning sesh with Doug and would family go in relationships or new section? I'm still planning to add wig stuff to Michaela just been sidetracked D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ooo, thanks for the Barnstar. :) If there isn't any more sources on Darren wearing fake tan then it probably isn't notable enough for a mention. Stuff to do with appearance usually fits into the characterisation section.RaintheOne ^BAM 21:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i know. I thought it should go in but if it can't be sourced i'll leave it. I meant would a new section for family go under relationships or go under a complete new development section?D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry having a blonde moment. You can start a family section if there is enough info. I only merge it into relationships when there is too little to talk about.RaintheOne ^BAM 22:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the help D4nnyw14 (talk) 06:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was this [17] storyline that LA announced for Darren the wedding? Was around same time. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hollyoaks: Animated appeared yesterday and the creator of the youtube vids has basically made it. It's not notable and some don't even get 100 views. I've nominated for deletion is there anything else we can do before then? Like to get it deleted faster or should we just redirect it? It's no way affiliated to c4 or hollyoaks and is complete fanfic and looks stupid D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It will get deleted if no one contests it. I'm sure an admin will notice it is written like an advertisement and non notable. Don't think there is a faster way than speedy deletion. Though I know some admins can "nuke" pages. Lets wait and see. Thanks for the Rae advice too, I'll also look to see if there are any other characterisation refs... if not I'll nominate it.RaintheOne ^BAM 18:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Realised could use speedy deletion so ignore this. I've looked for Rae refs for characterisation and there seem to be non at all. Non from tabloids or anywhere reallyD4nnyw14 (talk) 18:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User is ridiculous. How insane do you need to be to think an article about a youtube video series that doesn't even get 100 views sometimes is noteworthy enough to need a list of cast page and then separate pages for it! It's his own work and is trying to self promote but it's pissing me off. Users like this that don't even reply on talk pages are nothing but annoying vandals.D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When I'm done with the Xfactor, I'll see if we can get all of this shifted. I agree - it pisses me off too. They all need nuking and the editor dealt with.RaintheOne ^BAM 18:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making me smile on the 'Animated' talk page. I agree so much. It shouldn't be so easy for people to add bullshit but if new pages had to be passed it'd take forever.D4nnyw14 (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There we go - all deleted. Lets hope they don't make more.RaintheOne ^BAM 20:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i've just finished Rae's section on Silas's article. I am doing an other storylines one (including where he was palnning to strangle Nancy) and I was wondering if you have think link to a Hollyoaks teaser video where Silas was talking about Mercedes and then walking up behind her) as I want to put that in about the candle stick and Jen Metcalfe's comment about it in an interview with ds.--AcidBrights (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yea thats what I was asking lol I do go on a bit! :) Thanks--AcidBrights (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rain! If you get chance tonight, could you please take a look at the GAN for Ollie? There are just a couple of small wording issues to take care of, but my connection is being temperamental as hell (think standing on one leg by the window to get a signal haha) but I really need to finish up a copyedit elsewhere I promised would be done by Sunday. If not, no worries, I'll get on it when I'm out of the wilderness and not being disconnected every 5 minutes. Cheers! Frickative 23:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been so long I didn't think to look. Sure I will. Tonight or tomorrow. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 00:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Rain, you're a star! Frickative 00:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At DS when you get a chance to read it. Don't know how often you check so thought i'd notify you. Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How would you put them - [18] - in the cast list? Lol. Oh, and didn't Hollyoaks announce something similar a while ago? - JuneGloom Talk 16:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha, just seen this - [19]. I lost my internet connection earlier, just as I realised the IP is Tom. - JuneGloom Talk 20:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was the most friendly way of saying what I'd like to say. =) So he is socking? SPI? I left a message on your talk btw.RaintheOne ^BAM 22:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He's just come straight off a block and started making exactly the same edits that he was blocked for. I think AIV is a better place to report him. I'll go reply to your message on my talk page. - JuneGloom Talk 22:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okeydokie .. & Oh I see. You are right, just as bad as before, but does use talk pages now - though that isn't a plus.RaintheOne ^BAM 23:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reported Tom to AIV, did you see his confession about being a sock on his talk page? - JuneGloom Talk 19:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why he admitted it IDK - he cannot think he can stay now, I mean it is not like he changed his ways either. Still as opposed to the guidelines as he ever was.RaintheOne ^BAM 20:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln Lewis' casting has been announced, think this can go to the mainspace soon. - JuneGloom Talk 16:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a quick break from filling up my watchlist and just read over Kyle's lead for me? The last paragraph was a bitch. :) - JuneGloom Talk 14:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I love the new pics, especially Lou's one! - JuneGloom Talk 11:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know, Digital Spy is now published by Hearst Magazines UK. - JuneGloom Talk 13:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you just discovered Yahoo's soaps section? - JuneGloom Talk 20:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie's going to need a new picture when this - [20] - storyline kicks off, lol. JuneGloom Talk 19:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that Sunset Beach AFD. If you check Sarah G. Buxton's page, I think you can use the fourth ref for Annie's article. I'm not doing anything at the moment, so I might take on Virginia if I can find some sources. - JuneGloom Talk 19:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you an email, btw. - JuneGloom Talk 00:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell?! Looks like the Emmerdale 2012 list needs to be created, so this can be redirected. - JuneGloom Talk 18:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the hidden notes, what a bloody cheek - [21]. Needless to say, I removed them and cleaned up the article. - JuneGloom Talk 18:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail. - JuneGloom Talk 22:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This might come in handy - [22] - JuneGloom Talk 13:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the articles :) --AcidBrights (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, i'm planning to redo the whole article in my sandbox, as the one in the main space just keeps getting random edits which are unreferenced etc. Yea, i'm planning to do every section for every character, it may take me a while but I have till basically the end of the year if need be, because I don't think any of the newer characters will have their own articles, unless they have really big storylines.--AcidBrights (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah maybe, if I get round to their articles soon, i'm doing the Silas article at the same time, so i'll be juggling them both.--AcidBrights (talk) 21:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just wondering did you find that link to do with Silas and Mercedes or not?--AcidBrights (talk) 12:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New images are up at WMC. Do we need to crop out the girl or not? D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She replied to me too - and wanted to know if we are working together. I'll just not reply lol - did you mention to her that she will be cropped out? I'll put them on the crop list and when they are added to articles, you can link her too them. (She did say she wanted to see where they are going didn't she?)RaintheOne ^BAM 16:51, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah and i think so :S don't think cropping her will be a problem but could be. How long will crop list take?D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing this is ok despite it being B+W isn't it?D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not long, about an hour or two - there seems to be a good editor always on hand there. BTW, the dog in the pond pic is perfect! :)RaintheOne ^BAM 17:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Person was really helpful. Changed it wrongly then changed it to the right and said thanks to me for using it :)D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Danny, you've named the images "with fan" - :p Fan won't be present for much longer. Anyway, they're in the request spot now. Eeeeeek, loving the gallery.RaintheOne ^BAM 18:16, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh thought both images would stay. Have you requested a rename? Or i'll do it. D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I requested a rename lolRaintheOne ^BAM 18:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll email her after it's all completed. D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:33, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Four of them are now cropped and ready - the name will stay the same apparently lol :)RaintheOne ^BAM 21:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We can request name changes later. I did for Jack cos i named it something really long by accident. Why haven't Karen Hassan and Carley Stenson been done?D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It says not to ask for too many at once. So one editor has done some, but left Carley for someone else. Didn't ask for Karen sorry. I might wait a few days and We'll get every image there named correctly, I think there are more with long names. Though if you want to you can request.RaintheOne ^BAM 21:54, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i'll do it tommorow.D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:55, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Woop. It was a shame Ethan and Liberty were behind the bloody fence wasn't it.RaintheOne ^BAM 21:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shame Danny Mac really isn't that important too :p Might have been a Chris Fountain one but am not sure. D4nnyw14 (talk) 14:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what's gone wonky here, Rain, but I've taken the template off. I've just had the same thing with File:AbraDurant.JPG, which is obviously not orphaned either. The only thing I can think of is maybe it's something to do with the pages moving back and forth, but I don't know why that would throw up false 'orphaned' errors =/. Frickative 10:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How strange is that. When I first clicked my talk page, I went crazy because I thought the same was happening like with Ollie's pic! Then read your message. I just moved all those pages back, didn't even see the point in waiting. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 12:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed a few issues in the lead which I applied corrections to. There was also a case of "it's" being used where "its" should have been. Just wanted to bring this to your attention, as you may want to keep an eye out for these things (I notice it's nominated for GA). -- James26 (talk) 05:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou James, I shall make a bigger effort to combat those errors in future. I do often misplace punctuation and make some grammatical errors, probs my worst flaw on here. I manage to notice most these days though.RaintheOne ^BAM 15:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing Silas's storylines now and what can I say about that thing with Mercedes when he was walking up behind her with the candle stick, he was going to murder/hurt her right?--AcidBrights (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was so touching, so here's my thanks :)

So she has definitely gone? Yahoo! are saying christmas now?D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who publishes DS now? And say im adding a source from DS from 2010 who would i put the publisher as? Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sent you a message at D.S. if you get a chance to reply :) D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After i've finished M++T+J do G+C+N need sections? Are they noteworthy enough yet? I think they are?D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was wondering should Terry the dog be put into recurring. He has his own cast profile and i'm sure Jaci Stephens commented on him the other day so we could give him a table entry. Speaking of dogs we now have a Hollie-Jay pic (Jk i love Hollie-Jay and Michaela).D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is good news, why does it look different on the upload page though? Like the usual info is not there. As for Terry, non of include pets unless they become notable like Bouncer in Neighbours and Wellard in EE. Dogs like Eccles, Terence and co have profiles sometimes, but just get discarded here. So I wouldn't worry about it.RaintheOne ^BAM 20:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok info is here weirdly. Should we just merge both files?D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to request someone merge the two and look over it - complicated this one!RaintheOne ^BAM 21:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How and where?D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Although i don't know if you'll know but i thought i'd ask you first. Do you know why the template thingy you add to a page in the wikiproject comes up as NA-class for redirects (e.g. [23]) but on EE's redirects they are added to the catergory automatically and come up as redirect e.g. ([24]).D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do redirects to non list entries that go to an actual page but are redirects because of wrong or moved page names like Mitzeee Minniver need banners?D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice the poster had the picture being used on Gilly's wiki page!!! Laziness on HO's part but made me smileD4nnyw14 (talk) 18:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I was just coming to tell you!!! They actually used the crop aswell. You know what the means though, someone there actually checks the wikipages!!!RaintheOne ^BAM 18:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that. Wasn't even Gilly was AQ not even in character! I know which is great aswell and hopefully were doing a good job!D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well Frick's. I love having Amy and Michaela back together, they make the show complete again. I don't want Sasha back though.

Or Lauren both were dreadful and didn't really care for Calvin that much either.D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This could do with a rename if you get a chance. ThanksD4nnyw14 (talk) 11:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another if you'd be so kind. Surprised how many big names were missing the WPHO banner on their character pages like Justin Burton and Gordon Cunningham etc. Think i've got them all now but no 100% but should be done soon.D4nnyw14 (talk) 23:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be a nuisance but i've found yet another wrongly named image if you'd be so kind. ThanksD4nnyw14 (talk) 15:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The lists are really bad but the past cast is awful. Im trying to improve it and remove some minor characters any chance you could go through the 2008-2010 section and remove any you think should be removed? I've done most (not done 2011 yet) but i find it hard to decide who deserves to be there or not. ThanksD4nnyw14 (talk) 22:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two questions are either Russ or Silas notable for their own sections on Mercedes page and do you remember when this part of the HIV sl took place? Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how would i go about sourcing content from here just like the wig stuff for Michaela?D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just cite the web page as usual, if or when the video goes dead - I change it to the same format as Michaela's wig. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 16:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks:) D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy's birthdate is 3 November 1983, i think the IP got confused as recently in an interview (think im using it as a source and the quote from it) Metcalfe said Mercedes has had 3 weddings which is some going for a 25 year old but Metcalfe is probably wrong, i doubt she remembers everything about Mercedes. Should we add the correct birthdate in? We could change the quote and either remove the for a 25 year old bit or change the age? D4nnyw14 (talk) 14:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at Nana Moon, could it reach GA, after that extremely 'in depth' review of Rainie, and the pass of Dotty and Yusef, I guess it cold be plausible. I would have to do all the publishing details first- comments?

My Comments? Cool. I think you shouldn't nominate Nana Moon at all - it is a poor article, worse than Manda Best's. I'll give you one thing though, your GA's have been lucky - some of us around here have to jump through several thousand hoops before we have our work promoted to GA.RaintheOne ^BAM 21:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little surprised at Rainie's review and if I didn't have better things to do, I'd probably take it to

WP:GAR. Manda's review was somewhat better, though the reviewer made some incorrect suggestions. This is an expample of a good review - [25]. The reviewer was great and the article totally benefitted from that review. It's probably one of my strongest GAs out there. - JuneGloom Talk 22:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree with all your comments, that's why I brought it up. Dotty, yes it is a GA, but it is listed as low, which is correct, but so is Chrissie Watts, which i.m.o has had a lot more work put into it than Dotty's, Rainie's and Yusef's , i think we all need a clear understanding of what level GA's should be listed at. Yes if articles like Dotty are passed, good news for the project.

Another thing, though some may be against it, should we ask for a reassassement of

I think you have made a mistake in asking for another review.. I've got to be honest Mario, it is a nice effort you put in - but not enough for GA. It is a little thin, hardly any fleshed out development.. Have you built Manda's article to it's full potential? I didn't agree with the quickfail or points made - but that is just because there are some more .. lets say obvious issues. I want you to do better, so in future really work at something. I feel you have a tendancy to nominate everything you expand.RaintheOne ^BAM 16:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken Manda off GA if you havent noticed. :)

Hello again Rain! Thought I'd drop by and say I think I'm done with the references on

Ping! 18:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, I don't understand your "Eastenders may be top dog everywhere else..." comment. I don't even like Eastenders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesertHotIceCold (talk • contribs) 22:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit : Ok thank you :) That's a fair point, but I felt like I needed to change some incorrect information. And thanks, I'll try and stick around! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesertHotIceCold (talk • contribs) 22:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you work on these articles for me and that pesky IP editor who recently posted in

I wasn't going to comment to you in this section until you made this bad-faith nomination, which I replied to. But it is not up to Raintheone to save you from embarrassment. The embarrassment is already there, since you nominated these articles for deletion. I'll continue to be that "pesky IP editor" showing others just how wrong you are until you learn. 174.137.184.36 (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall look over them. I have never watched this soap opera, but I'll be able rto figure the main thread of story. I shall add sources if I have time.RaintheOne ^BAM 14:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't contesting merging, just the redirect, as I know all to well he is not that notable. However, it will need merging into List of Coronation Street characters (2007). I should have explained better in my edit summary. :)RaintheOne ^BAM 14:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC) Originally posted at User talk:Dondegroovily (section)[reply]

Got it. Merge is done.

D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

[26] I are confused... causa sui (talk) 21:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, im actually pretty close to being done, just got a few more storylines and the intro and reception. Sorry its took so long but i've been busy and stuff and i want to make it the best i can.--AcidBrights (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silas's storylines are going to e longer than what they are now, and to be honest I don't think it can be helped. Have you got any ideas?--AcidBrights (talk) 19:57, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've cut down the storylines a bit more, can you have a look for me? I don't think I can cut anymore down so far. altough, instead of chester herland newspaper could i say just a local newspaper?--AcidBrights (talk) 13:59, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i've made some more changes and to be honest i'm struggling i was wondering, and you don't have to, but would you like to copy and paste the storylines from my sandbox into your space and edit out what you think would need to go, cos i'm really tearing my hair out about it. --AcidBrights (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I need help from you for providing a source for the promotional photo of the cast of

]

Silas

Okay, things are going to get a little confusing, because for Silas's new storylines obviously the thing about mercedes kidnap will get her own section. But the things about silas picking four victims and Lynsey having to work it out, because the theresa/rae section is below lysneys feud section, so its going to be confusing cos people won't know what signifcance theresa has to the story etc if the thing about the four potential victims went under lynsey section.. help please! lol :)--AcidBrights (talk) 11:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, i've been panicking about it, have you got any further on with the storylines?--AcidBrights (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering you know in the storylines, do you think, for example this: Silas meets fellow journalist, Nancy Hayton (Jessica Fox), and they visit the crime scene of India's murder. Silas prepares to strangle Nancy to death, but is interrupted by her boyfriend, Darren Osborne. just really needs to be this:

silas meets fellows journalist, Nancy Hayton, and prepares to strangle her to death but is interrupted by her boyfriend, Darren Osborne.--AcidBrights (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Corrie Update?

I know I'm not as active as I use to be, but I'm now on a mission to update the Corrie character articles, especially articles such as Carla Connor who is at the centre of the show's flagship storyline at the minute. And also, what is the deal with the romances tab on the characters infoboxes? I add some and they get taken off, yet some characters have them and others don't? Alex250P (talk) 13:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Livesy and Jackson Walsh

Hi Raintheone. A user has contested the deletion of Aaron Livesy and Jackson Walsh on my talk page. As the editor who originally nominated the page for deletion, your input would be appreciated. Thanks, FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:JFAP.jpg

Is the exact source necessary? Is the image a screenshot or a promo image? The

talk) 20:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Jake Martin.jpg

What about this image? If it is a promo image, should the source be exact or brief? The sources for images Holby City characters are brief without exact sources, or am I mistaken? --

talk) 21:37, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

4 REFS

Hi! These 4 refs are dead, is there any way you ahve any of them?!

They are:

"Dotty Cotton".

Channel 5

. Retrieved 7 May 2011.

"Charlie to say goodbye?". Holy Soap. 8 August 2010. Retrieved 9 March 2011.

"Carl joins cast of EastEnders". 9 October 2008. Retrieved 8 April 2011.

"Student makes EastEnders debut".

Hemel Hempstead Gazette. Hemel Hempstead: Premier Newspapers

. 12 June 2008. Retrieved 2 April 2011.

Thanks if you can get any of them- it'd be great :)

Mario 16:34, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I already archived Dotty Cotton's HolySoap profile - [27] - one day this link might work for "Charlie to say goodbye" [28] - as for the other two, theyre lost forever. Best advice - use WebCite - when you add a ref put the URL in the top box, your email in the second and you will have it forever - takes a few seconds too.RaintheOne ^BAM 16:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Just for helping me!!!!! A little thing, which meant a lot :) Mario 16:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Thanks Mario.RaintheOne ^BAM 16:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources requested for Cora Cross

Hi, this is the same question which GSorby did for Anthony, but can i have all the Inside Soap refs?! it would be great if you could, thanks :)

Mario 17:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

You can add them on the talkpage at the

Ping! 17:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

oh I didnt see that sandbox! Umm, what should we do?! I guess if your is more developed we should use yours :( Aslong as I can edit it :/

Mario 17:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Yeah sure, go for it!

Ping! 17:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh - I'll have a look for some online laters - But I'll do some scans in a day or two if ya don't mind. Haven't got any wiki energy atm.RaintheOne ^BAM 17:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know how you feel!

Ping! 17:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Rain! I saw your comment at the WP talk, are you not going to find any sources for my

Ping! 18:22, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll deffo have a look and see if i have anything worth scanning tomorrow - seeings as you want them for a normal topic. And well because it is you. :)RaintheOne BAM 18:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awww thanks ;-)

Ping! 18:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Silas

I've got all day to day, so i'm going to try and get most of the article finished as there is a lot more info again. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 07:50, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you manage to do anything with those storylines and btw, is silas leaving or is it just the storylines thats coming to a climax at halloween? --AcidBrights (talk) 12:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, and do you know whether silas is leaving at halloween or is the storyline itself just coming to a climax and will other stuff carry on around it?--AcidBrights (talk) 12:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know this storyline is soooo amazing I just love it, and Karen and Jeff are amazing! I need to put the ref that claimed he was going to kill heidi somewhere...--AcidBrights (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, i've started the storylines and there actually nearly done for so far, can you check them to make sure there not too detailed or under detailed please?--AcidBrights (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you have a look at the storylines in my sandbox please, i cant seem to cut the last papragraph down anymore than I have.--AcidBrights (talk) 13:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Storylines are done, but i need to do reception, add a bit more to the halloween section and an intro, so not much rly. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the latest silas stuff --AcidBrights (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tegan/Saskia's Photo

Hi! sorry for being a little annoying regarding Saskia's picture a couple of days ago. However; i have found a REAL picture of Saskia & her husband Jamie; It's here at this link http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Saskia+Burmeister/Jamie+Croft and if you compare it to the picture which you thought was Saskia and Jamie here [29] was correct; you are wrong. I'm In no place to keep on deleting the picture (you are correct) however If you compare these 2 pictures; They are not the same. The image i have shown you of the real couple has so resemblance whats so ever to the picture you have claimed to be Saskia's; and for someone that has met both Saskia and her husband in person i think i know what i'm talking about. So could you please look into this and REMOVE the picture from both Tegan's article and Saskia's? :) thankyou!

btw there are more pictures which you can compare with the picture you thought was Saskia & Jamie here: http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Saskia+Burmeister/Jamie+Croft/Bright+Star+Australian+Premiere+Party/DEDVJJ1J_zG — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.110.59 (talk) 01:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, you are in no position to delete the image because you are making false claims. Here is another picture of her from the night, you can clearly see her pointy outward ears in this one - [30] - compare it to this other pics in the google search with her hair scraped back and you'll see they match perfectly. This being one - [31] - the other host is blacklisted so cannot post it.

You have gone out of your way fetching up photos where she has her hair down, dyed a different colour, wearing casual clothes and is caked in make-up. You think that can fool us? No. So stop telling us to take the image down, a photogrpaher donated it to the commons, thankgod she knows what Saskia looks like, it is her job, you know - like a avid fan should know what she looks like aswell - but that is not always the case.. it would seem.RaintheOne ^BAM 02:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um that still isn't her. And yes i've been trying to find a picture of her and her husband to prove to you that isn't her picture...and now you are being rude. I'm not trying to fool you. If you saw the picture i worked really hard to get from the internet you are sort of stupid. And that man there with the beard isn't even her husband. Also; her "Point Outward Ears" have nothing to do with it. Did you see the magazine issue of her wedding when it came out? You have got her husband's picture wrong. Those are completely different people. Gosh i asked you to look into it not just reply to me with the same stuff.... thanks anyway. I asked the opinions of many others and they agreed that the picture isn't Saskia...but that doesn't matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.110.59 (talk) 02:56, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the photographer might have got something mixed up; Considering she had to take pictures of THOUSANDS. And I am a big fan; I've seen her in Hating Alison Ashley, Sea Patroll, Wicked Science, Pirate Islands & many more shows. Just because their is her name along with that Picture which isn't her doesn't mean it is. And please stop sarcasm i'm just trying to be nice. 121.220.110.59 (talk) 03:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honey, your the one calling me "sort of stupid", so now I've grown tired of your antics - I'd prefer it if you didn't bother me on my talk page about Saskia again - you are the only one who cannot accept the image is Saskia, and to reiterate, it clearly is - so please accept this and move foward, okies? :)RaintheOne ^BAM 03:57, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok *Honey* hope the laser eye surgery goes a success. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.110.59 (talk) 04:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi just wanted to say sorry i was not on yesterday to carry on with silas's article, it was my birthday so i was a bit busy and i got a new laptop! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday for yesterday AcidBrights!!!! ;)

Mario 10:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Happy birthday for yesterday! You share the same birthday as Hollyoaks aswell :) D4nnyw14 (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!!!! Wooo !!!!! (No one should edit on their bday - more like getting smashed)RaintheOne ^BAM 14:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know, i love it every year i share my birthday with hollyokas and it is my favourite soap too.--AcidBrights (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, okay i've been thinking today and do you think we should split silas's casting and characterisation up and add stuff about the hollyokas website silas watch, although im not sure how i would word it? Btw, who do you think he murders on halloween?--AcidBrights (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure AB... we wouldn't want to use too many primary sources from E4 - but it is up to you.RaintheOne ^BAM 19:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Anthony Moon

nominate ) 12:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC) New Page Patrol survey New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Raintheone! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC) Have a good one! If you dont have any of this its not a holdiay!!! :) Mario 15:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Do not worry, the beer is calling me already. =)RaintheOne BAM 15:42, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply] got it on speed dial then :) Mario 15:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Photographer's Barnstar The Photographer's Barnstar For your images of Bet Lynch, Hilda Ogden, and Deirdre and Ken Barlow. Utterly invaluable, not just to the Corrie Project but to soaps on Wikipedia as a whole. To have free images of some of the biggest names in UK soap is just fantastic :) Frickative 16:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Oooo, Thankyou :)RaintheOne BAM 18:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Ricki-Lee Coulter Hi there, thank you for adding a new image on the talk 00:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] I'm glad theres an image that shows her face. I'm after a image of talk 00:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Wow thank you! thank you! thank you! :) Theres just one more image (of talk 02:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] There is one person in that image that isn't a member of the group and there is one person of the group that's missing in the image. Heres what they look like. I'm sorry, I thought you knew them. talk 12:06, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Thanks! :) talk 12:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] HO Hey, was Tiddy credited for the 2nd? She was on the voice mail when Carl walked in? D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] You will have to look into it on 4oD to settle the matter once and for all. lolRaintheOne BAM 21:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Will do. While on the subject was Rae when Ste was listening to the message over and over? D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:15, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Nope, I was watching that one. As I recall everyone wanted Rae changed - but her arm wasn't credited either. lolRaintheOne BAM 21:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I was amongst them wanting her last date changed as her arm appeared :P D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Kiddy wasn't credited so her last appearance should be the 1st. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Kim Kiddy does have more of a ring to it.RaintheOne BAM 21:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I seem to be constantly making stupid mistaks, the other day i changed Heidi's last appearance too the 32nd of October :P Not sure whether i should bother renominating Darren, do we need to source soap sl's again now? D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] If it were me... I'd work on the prose first - do more paraphrasing - then renominate. You know I think sourcing storylines is a big pile of wank - that discussion was just a bunch of people throwing orders around, because they have no intention of helping - aslong as they don't have to do it they are more than happy have an opinion and let everyone know it. You could source them and that dude would review it though. Just depends on how bad you want your first GA.RaintheOne BAM 21:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Not that badly, i've looked for potential sl sources and most are complete gray areas so it'd be next to impossible. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Well just do the first option - they have never been needed before and it isn't an official rule. It is just other editors reading what they want to see out of policies that have been there forever. You could delete the storyline section too - not the desired outcome but hey.RaintheOne BAM 21:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I'd rather not have it at GA then delete the sl section. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I'm nearly done with Silas's article, so I will sort that out and are you putting my draft of Leyla's article up live?--AcidBrights (talk) 19:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey, do you know how Darren left HO back in 1999 and how he returned in 2003? Was it because of Mark/Luke? The way it was in the sl section seems vague. Great work on the 2011 list aswell its looking much better. D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey Rain, can I ask you, you know in Silas's storyline section is it right to put "strangle to death" for a character who he murdered, or should I just put murder them?--AcidBrights (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC) I just mean't for keeping the storyline section to the minimum number of words possible.--AcidBrights (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Would you say that the ref on ds about Jeff saying about the climax of the storyline was basically saying that he would be leavin?--AcidBrights (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Dante Falconeri and Lulu Spencer page deletion I noticed that you were the admin responsible for the deletion of the Dante Falconeri and Lulu Spencer page deletion. I also see that youre a big soap opera fan so Im suprised you dont understand why the page is relevant. While the sources were messy, I honestly believe that if worked on, the page could be useful. There are plenty of soup couple pages for couples that arent nearly as popular as Dante and Lulu and are not even currently together. I believe the only issue is that they are well sourced while the Dante & Lulu page was not. I personally am invested in this page (having updated it a handful of times) and would be willing to put in the research to find sources. I understand that they have separate & personal pages, but those pages also have details of other plot lines mixed in with theirs. It would be useful to have back the page that was solely devoted to their storyline. Contrary to what some might believe they are still an extremely relevant couple. They have garnered a huge amount of fans and I think this page would be useful. I was really hoping you would consider undeleting it. I know I am not a registered member, and this is the first time I have requested an undeletion. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.244.200 (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I did a source check and the subject as a duo did not pass WP:GNG - therefore it shouldn't me included. If there were sources, I'd of improved it myself - because it was a mess and just a hehash of storylines. I know you feel, I wish certain subjects would have more weight behind them and the sources to prove it... but sometimes this isn't the case. I believe in the values of this encyclopedia - I hate the fansirte feel it has at times ... so if it isn't notable why should we be scraping the barrel trying to include something of no interest. As single units through their own storyline, they are notable, so that is the silver lining. PS. I'm not an admin. ;)RaintheOne BAM 15:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Mail Hey, you have mail. - JuneGloom Talk 16:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] She is not Saskia Burmeister I've read your discussion about Saskia Burmeister and I can confirm it's not her. I had already noticed the wrong picture on her page and I removed it more of a week ago.--Supremo (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I knew her since I was a teen and I can perfectly recognize her face. I don't need to compare it with the other pics on the web. It is not her! And there isn't a need to know her in real life! It's so obvious! Anyone knowing her can notice it. I'm not the only one who thinks so. I noticed it before I read that discussion. The other person in the photo isn't her husband as well: another user noticed it too. It's a completely wrong picture.--Supremo (talk) 23:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Also, her husband has got brown eyes, while the man shown in the photo has got blu eyes. But don't you notice that he's quite another person? Bah...--Supremo (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I know her since I was a teen, but on TV. I don't know her in real life, of course. What do you want to mean about my style??--Supremo (talk) 23:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] If you are talking about my "syle" (writing), I'm Italian and English is not my first language.--Supremo (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thankyou Supremo for proving that picture isn't Saskia. These people think they know everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.56.19 (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] HO Hey, I was wondering if you could scan and send me the Inside Soap interviews about Fright Night with Karen Hassan, BHS, Jorgie Porter and ASD please? If thats okay, that would be a great help, thanks. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey there, I shall have a look and scan them later on today, if that is okay? :)RaintheOne BAM 15:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks :)--AcidBrights (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Do you know which week it was in?RaintheOne BAM 15:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Ahh, not to worry, I have remembered now. My mind keeps going blank today.RaintheOne BAM 15:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey, wondering if you could do me a massive favour and have a look for a ref for Darren's involvement in Luke's rape and then exit? D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Only if you find out the date that Jade first appeared? (Jade aka Barney's one night stand) ... Deal?RaintheOne BAM 21:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Deal, your getting the short straw though :P D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] But do not blame me if I cannot find anything. I've got an idea of where to look though.RaintheOne BAM 21:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I won't, if worse comes to worse i'll leave it unsourced or use a source about his 2003 return. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] It is a shame there isn't more sources for that era. We'd be well in there if half the old entertainment websites didn't close down.RaintheOne BAM 22:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Oh, and AB, I haven't forgotten about your inside soap request, though they might be with you in the early hours. I've found myself busier than I expected to be.RaintheOne BAM 22:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I know :( did Jade first appear at the Hollyoaks ball? If so it'd make it the 29th of September D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] She was sitting over the other side of the room eyeing Barney up as I recall, so she must have appeared in two episodes. Because her second episode was when she woke up with him.RaintheOne BAM 22:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Her first will be the 29th then, imdb says she appeared in four eps but im not sure if thats reliable. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Oh she didn't did she, it was just two. I am very sure it was just the two, yeah?RaintheOne BAM 22:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, imdb sayss she appeared in the freshers first ep which im sure is wrong. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] It is. IMBD is pretty unreliable most of the time. It is run by user contribs just like here ain't it.RaintheOne BAM 22:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Spoilers listed the freshers as arriving on the 26, but they arrived on the 28th didn't they?RaintheOne BAM 22:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, you're right. IMDB is impossible to edit though otherwise things could be fixed by people who know. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I Think I'll stick with Wikipedia. lolRaintheOne BAM 22:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] IMDB will eventually bring you over to the dark side.D4nnyw14 (talk) 23:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I've found something of importance Danny, the Luke bit is wrong and the order of events.RaintheOne BAM 00:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] What have you found? D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] The order of events was wrong, I'll write a new line for your SL's with the ref. "Darren becomes friends with Luke, together they stand up to bully Mark. However, Mark's bullying of Luke becomes more severe. Darren decides to make friends with Mark in the hope he will go easy on Luke. His attempts do not succeed and Mark rapes Luke." Evans, Matthew (2002). Phil Redmond's Hollyoaks: the official companion. Channel 4. p. 48, 49. ISBN 0752220004.RaintheOne BAM 17:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Thank you and them events seem less harsh. So Darren didn't steal Mandy and didn't leave because of this storyline :S? D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Well I missed that out, you can cite "After Luke's ordeal, his relationship with Mandy begins to fail and Darren takes advantage of the situation." No mention of him leaving though.RaintheOne BAM 17:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Arghh everytime i finish adding a source i find a new one to add. Thanks for all the help with the article, will be finally renominating in a few days.D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Silas's article is now down and up live, WOO WOO FINALLY! It was a lot of work, but its really worth it to see the finished result.--AcidBrights (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank you so much! I was just thinking the other day I started it in August and its November now, but i've really loved doing it.--AcidBrights (talk) 15:29, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Mark Jury Sorry Rain, got no clue about his first and last appeareneces, details on DS archives are sketchy at best and HO isn't really my forte although I will tidy the odd article for it. I'm just more of a Neighbours, H&A, EE, Corrie E'Dale guy. Good luck though. Conquistador2k6 16:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thankyou for looking into it anyway. :)RaintheOne BAM 16:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Discussion Hi there, please help reach consensus by weighing in your opinion here. Thanks! talk 00:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Corrie I need a massive favour please, I was wondering if you could find me all articles from soap magazines to do with the fantastic Sunita Alahan from Corrie as I really want to do more with her article once i've finished Silas's aritcle (which is nearly done btw, I promise!) and i'm hoping to improve it loads as I think my wiki skills have improved loads since I last edited it. --AcidBrights (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] No, but its more past articles on her, when she returned in 09 and stuff.--AcidBrights (talk) 21:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey, I was wondering, on Silas's article in mercedes section do i need to put, she is found or just leave it because it will be in the storylines?--AcidBrights (talk) 09:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Favour 2 Richie, help me! Ping! 22:41, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Ruby Hey, i'm sorry to be such a pain but can you do me a massive favour, can we scrap the idea of you finding articles on Sunita and find them on Ruby Button instead because I really, really want to make her article. I'm sorry to be such a pain, but want newer oaks characters to have amazing articles. Would that be ok?--AcidBrights (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank you so much for scanning those articles, you are a star! :) Btw, i'm also revamping Heidi's article as I think it is important for me to put right the work I did when I wasn't a very good editor.--AcidBrights (talk) 19:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Sorry, I think I was a bit distracted there! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 20:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Bizarre I just thought I'd let you know. Yesterday you sent a warning to User talk:193.63.86.253 and just received it before I logged in at the library! It wasn't me though ;-) –anemoneprojectors– 14:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Gay soap characters I have edited down my summaries on the gay soap characters page, per what you mentioned. I was wondering if there was any way to at least list the gay characters and give a brief description, since they did have some importance (Kevin Sheffield was the first gay teen on US soaps and this was the first time reparative therapy was shown on a soap; Michael Delaney and Brad Phillips were the first gay couple seen on a US soap). I also wanted to ask if Reese should be included, since her wedding to Bianca did receive prominent press attention. I was also wondering about creating a new soap in the category - a South African soap Isidingo had several gay characters, and generated some attention for having the first same-sex wedding on South African TV. Would it be OK to add a show? --JamesB3 (talk) 02:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for getting back so quickly. I also meant to ask if there was any reason why Verbotene Liebe is listed when Alles Was Zaehlt isn't. I know that Verbotene Liebe has more international fame. If I added Alles Was Zaehlt would it be deleted? --JamesB3 (talk) 02:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks. I am going to try later to rewrite the All My Children entry, just mention the characters, a quick summary, and the link to a news item on the Bianca/Reese wedding. Disambiguation link notification Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject. List of Hollyoaks characters (2010) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) was linked to Rob Edwards Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I know this is a bot, but it is my favourite Bot now. How handy was this!RaintheOne BAM 00:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Talking to yourself? ;) - JuneGloom Talk 01:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I may as well "seal the deal". I don't think sanity is a trait that someone who chooses to be a regular WP contributor can maintain. :pRaintheOne BAM 01:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Neighbours What do you mean it wasn't notable and a official release?? I have a copy of it in my hand, and what was wrong with the source provided? B.Davis2003 (talk) 03:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Soap suds I have, thankfully, almost finished April's article. The reception section is a bit on the small side, but there's not a lot I can do about that. If you're doing Bianca's article that means Elijah is the only regular without a list entry or article. I'm not that keen on creating his article as I find him dull. However, if I can gather enough sources, I'll give it a shot. - JuneGloom Talk 00:48, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I've decided that I hate writing leads. I've been starring at April's article for hours willing myself to write the lead and get the thing finished. You've made a great start with Elijah's article, btw! - JuneGloom Talk 22:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I love writing them, I like summarising all the interesting facts and information that may want to make people read more. I think I'll have trouble doing that for Elijah though. ;) When you manage to complete the lead, I'll find a nice screenshot of her, how about that? :)RaintheOne BAM 22:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I can't believe you love writing leads. You're weird. :P It's only taken all day, but I've made a good start on April's lead. I'll finish it tomorrow and get the article moved to the mainspace, so you can add that nice screenshot to it. :) If Bianca's the last one left, do you fancy another collab? Or do you want to create her article yourself? I don't mind if you choose the latter, I can finish Brax's article or carry on with Geoff's. - JuneGloom Talk 01:07, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I never know how to answer this type of question. Well, If you have an interest or wanted to do Bianca's article, then sure I'd accept. If you are offering to lighten my work load, then I don't mind doing it solo while you plough on with the other two. I've left you with ther tricky question. :pRaintheOne BAM 01:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I forgot to look at this. I'm happy for you to take Bianca. If you need any help though, you know where I am. I'll try and finish Brax's article in the meantime. How notable would you say VJ is? Is he Callum Jones notable? I was just wondering if we could get away with creating an article for him too. - JuneGloom Talk 01:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I don't know how useful it will be, but I found this amongst my many half-finished, WordPad articles - [32]. JuneGloom Talk 18:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Just found these - [33], [34] and [35] (small bit of reception after Christian's interview). - JuneGloom Talk 22:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] April's gone live, so get your image out. :) - JuneGloom Talk 00:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Awesome image, she looks so pretty (and now I'm totally jealous of her). - JuneGloom Talk 00:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Aww :p I was jealous of her anyway, she gets to sleep with Heath.RaintheOne BAM 00:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Of course, how could I forget that! She's so lucky, lol. - JuneGloom Talk 00:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Are you aware Miles has been reviewed? I just replied to the reviewer with a few points. - JuneGloom Talk 22:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] We need to talk about Libby. Neighbours have removed her from the opening credits (but didn't add Rhys, which was odd), so should we list her as a past character now? I wish there was a clear answer to this. The actress is ill and on a break, but the show is acting like she has made a proper departure and not coming back, at least not soon. - JuneGloom Talk 16:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I've replied on my talk page and opened a discussion on Libby's talk page, just so others don't have to trawl through our archives looking for the moment we agreed to class her as a past character. - JuneGloom Talk 17:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Oh, you replied here while I was replying there, and my suggestion has also been added while I was editing the talk. lol :)RaintheOne BAM 17:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Ha ha, this is what happens when a discussion is started on three different pages. - JuneGloom Talk 17:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hmm, the Neighbours Twitter account just tweeted they are still in talks with Kym about a return. - JuneGloom Talk 23:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Oh Neighbours! Shall we leave it until she agrees?RaintheOne BAM 23:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I have no idea what to do now! I haven't made the changes to her article yet, as I got distracted by another project. Someone removed her from the cast list earlier. - JuneGloom Talk 23:57, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Do you think that Gaby Willis should go back to the Willis list? Her article mostly consists of storylines and I'm pretty sure the only Willis children who are notable are Cody and Brad. - JuneGloom Talk 17:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I think we should give it a while longer, until new year. We could start a bigger discussion about the other several characters that are in the same boat. A few of the early teenagers seem lost causes.RaintheOne BAM 18:03, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] A while longer to do what? Magic some development info out of thin air? ;) I know there are several other characters that need sorting too, I guess I should crack on with creating some cast lists, so we have something to merge them to. Love Malcolm's new image, btw. He's looking quite handsome. - JuneGloom Talk 19:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Could you just check your email and see if I sent you one with a link to some Sunset Beach scans? - JuneGloom Talk 22:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] If you check that link again there should be another Sunset Beach article and the Darren article. - JuneGloom Talk 01:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] I reminded AP about removing the Cause of death/departure & Romance fields from the ibox and they're gone. :) - JuneGloom Talk 14:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] I remember seeing an article for Lance in one of the Inside Soap mags I have, remind me tomorrow and I'll scan it for you. - JuneGloom Talk 01:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for Justine's image! Have you seen Neighbours' new cast member? - JuneGloom Talk 21:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hollyoaks are so lucky, Dan "more wooden than a plank of wood" O'Connor has joined the cast - [36] - JuneGloom Talk 21:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Because it took me forever to make everything sortable and sourced, I want you to marvel at the improved List of births, marriages and deaths in Neighbours. - JuneGloom Talk 20:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] I've just made the H&A births table sortable offline (to see how it would look), but the surrogate mothers are causing a problem. I'm not sure how to make them sortable too and they're stretching the column. How important are they to the list? - JuneGloom Talk 00:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] I will get round to making the H&A deaths table sortable, but its the hardest and most boring of the lot. Also, an Inside Soap from April 1996 has just arrived for me. It's got quite a few Neighbours stories (Lou, Marlene, Serendipity), but I thought you'd be most interested in the H&A Steven Matheson section. I will scan it for you. The only problem is the magazine doesn't have a front cover, so there's no issue number. - JuneGloom Talk 17:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for that - [37]. - JuneGloom Talk 22:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] I've been working on an article for Annalise Hartman's sister and hopefully I'll get it moved to the mainspace tomorrow, but what I wanted to know was should the article remain Joanna Evans or be renamed Joanna Hartman? - JuneGloom Talk 02:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Could you find an image for Joanna's article? I shall be very grateful. :) - JuneGloom Talk 23:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Can you keep your eye on the H&A cast list, I think Gill is back. - JuneGloom Talk 00:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Wtf is going on with the Emmerdale cast list? We may need some more input from the WikiProject soon. - JuneGloom Talk 14:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] HOLA! Hey! I'm sorry to ask you this again, but if you could, would you be able to please find any articles to do with Heidi Costello from the soap magazines as i'm trying to revamp the articles which I created when I wasn't a very good editor.--AcidBrights (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey, I was wondering are you any further on with those scans or not, just want to get the article looking amazing! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] your email Is full so can't reply. D4nnyw14 (talk) WP:UNDUE Please stop adding more UK reviews, giving undue weight to both negative reviews as well as undue weight from UK reviews at the talk) 22:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Lhb - with all due respect, three editors support it's inclusion whereas you are the only one to object. You state we should wait until the discussion has ran its course - The request is a little hypocritical as you waded in there an removed the information twice. As the Guardian's coverage has a positive and negative about the programme's casting - it has provided a balance again. I thank you for being good enough to ask me to remove it, but I think it is best if we talk about whether everyone else who contributes would like its inclusion. Atleast then there won't be any arguement between us and other can decide for us. You've removed what I added, I've added something totally different - it'll end sour if we keep on like this - we should perhaps rest a little and talk it over, reass what is best for the article. What do you think of that?RaintheOne BAM 22:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] The discussion is on undue weight, yet you add another negative UK review ADDING to the undue weight? How does that kind of move promote collegial and cooperative editing between editors? talk) 23:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] The Guardian had praise for Ricci, but not for the rest of the cast. That makes it a mixed review. ;)RaintheOne BAM 23:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Infact I thought be may end up being a little to me/to you - So I've requested comment from WP:TV. Maybe more members might be interested helping reach a consensus on the matter.RaintheOne BAM 22:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Image Hi there, I was wondering if you could upload a free image of talk 04:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ]  DoneThere you go Oz. :)RaintheOne BAM 18:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thank you :) talk 20:57, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Re: Kit I've been trying to shave that down. 2006-07 had a critical story arc for (Kim and the Baby). I'm just trying to figure out what can go and what stays. Seems she did more as a recurring than a regular and I Guess I put everything but the Kitchen sink into that one (Insomnia will do that to a guy, lol). Conquistador2k6 25 November 2011 23:47 (UTC) No Rush. I've seen your workload. You're already giving yourself a hernia with trying to restore Ric and your frequent Pan AM and Hollyoaks updates. At least we have the SLs of it and at least one reception reference. And beside I liked the Hunters bar Henry who was the least interesting. Conquistador2k6 26 November 2011 00:03 (UTC) Thanks Thanks for that! Its a great interview, btw have you had any luck with those scans?--AcidBrights (talk) 13:07, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] OMG, Just watched up to 9 minutes, why is the fabulous Jess Forrest and the amazing Leanne?!--AcidBrights (talk) 13:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I mean't the scans from soap mags for Heidi's articles. Oh yeah it's good to hear people use your work, and I hated the male interviewer, you could see he was just being obnoxious...--AcidBrights (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Mandy Hey hon, can you keep an eye out for any Mandy storylines in the soap mags that might be of use? Would really appreciate it. :) GunGagdinMoan 17:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] A barnstar for you! The Good Article Barnstar Thanks Raintheone for helping to promote give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil © • © 02:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Thankyou for this, you are the first to praise my work, so I'm very happy.RaintheOne BAM 16:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] URGENTLY need a water-bucket for the Jake Firestorm In examining the page of this Jake fellow: you seem to have been in communication with that user. You know the user. Come and see my talk page and tell me whether you think I am that user or not. User:Erikeltic seems to think I am Jake. He's making me miserable. I appeal to you because I need a balanced view that is not automatically in Erikeltic's favours. Djathinkimacowboy 18:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] A barnstar for you! The Barnstar of Good Humor The 'time machine' comment made me giggle- anyone who can make me laugh deserves a barnstar and you definetly deserve one!! Mario 17:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] lolRaintheOne BAM 17:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Congrats on Miles! Great article! Mario 17:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] I don't think I should promote any more H&A because they all leave the soap when they get to GA.RaintheOne BAM 17:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] I did laugh when I saw that, :D Mario 17:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Heidi Hey have you managed to scan those articles yet because I really want to get on with her article, because i'm doing ruby's now also?--AcidBrights (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Talkback Hello, Raintheone. You have new messages at 5 albert square's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. --5 albert square (talk) 23:19, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks Thanks for those articles. I've looked through them but do you think they could be contributed to Heidi's article?--AcidBrights (talk) 12:21, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Cain Hi can you do me a favour and fix the image name for Cain Dingle's image? Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]  DoneRaintheOne BAM 15:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks, something that has just crossed my mind, in Darren's article shouldn't we say Taylor Dawson or should we say Dawson? D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey Sorry to ask you various things, but will you have a look in here User:AcidBrights/Sandbox1 because i've been improving Sunita's article in my sandbox and I was wondering if you could check the storylines to see whether i've missed any storylines out, or anything that should be added (i was thinking about putting her support of Sophie and Sian maybe?)--AcidBrights (talk) 22:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Jacqui McQueen Hi Rain. Why did you change Jacqui's date of birth back to 1984? She was born the year after Niall, who was born in 1980. Also, 1984 would make Mercedes older than her and would mean Myra was 18 when she had her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesertHotIceCold (talk • contribs) 11:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Coronation Street timeline Im back after a long break I seem to be the only person working the Coronation Street timeline of late. Problem is I generally write about Sian and Sophie, as I use Your Tube for info on these two, there 1000's of Sian and Sophie videos there,they have a huge fan following. Theres very little on other Corrie characters !!!! Its kinda becomimg Sian/Sophie timeline..........I have stopped doing updates mean while!!!! Im not a huge corrie follower not that keen on Corrie when these two are not in a story line. Now that Parkinson has quit the soap last month. Her last scenes, a bust up at their wedding shows Jan 12 then no more :( I'm still bugged theres no pix on both Bio's for these two. I have emailed their agent, asking her to verify the Wikipedia entries, and please send me non copyright pix of both actresses. Dont ask dont get !!! gren500Gren500 (talk) 08:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] HO BBC America Link has gone dead, do you have it archived as i have no idea how to find archived links but i know you archived loads of sources? D4nnyw14 (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Just a small point, you reverted an IP for changing Shenton's birthday but [38] they were right. D4nnyw14 (talk) 11:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Wow Hi..i would just like to compliment you and talk) 07:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Taylor Hayes Picture Hi! i was wondering... i hope im not a bother. But could you upload a picture of talk) 10:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] The reason I used that photo is because there haven't been new photos of Taylor to be found. The picture is fine, and will remain. It represents the character fine. talk) 17:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] No it is not fine, while the image does it's job, the rationale is very bad.RaintheOne BAM 18:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Taylor Hayes We use smaller text on those things on all pages, it's how we've all been doing it. Plus, some of the information you undid was required as it is on all other pages. talk) 19:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] User:SoapJar21 Sorry.... Hi there! As you have seen...i tried to change the format of US Soap pages starting with User:Musicfreak7676 completely undid my revisions (i sorted out the sub-headings to years, like 1990-2002 & 2004-) and its actually really annoying. I also attempted to add information about Casting, Character's background etc. Also i thankyou for the links you sent me, i found a few great sources that could have helped me. And i also believe that the small (tiny) writing in the info-box is not acceptable to people with reading disabilities to see (your side-kick JuneGloom07 enforced this rule on my in the past (2009) when i was wondering. Thanks anyway..Hopefully one day (In the far or near future) these pages will get better. Also, they removed sections which would have eventually excelled (and improved greatly, they were still a work in process) like the "Casting information" and other parts - Isn't that considered as vandalism? Im glad there are people out there like you (On Wikipedia) who actually want Soap Pages to make sense. Also i want your opinion; with this (past revision) of the page i did - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Taylor_Hayes_(fictional_character)&oldid=465443117 - do you think that by looking at this page (with additional sources and better text) could have reached a good standard?. Sorry for wasting yours and my time...this pages won't reach the perfect standard. :) 101.160.166.149 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC).[reply ] CBS B&B Recaps http://www.cbs.com/shows/the_bold_and_the_beautiful/episodes/ Hi...The link above leads to CBS Recaps (of daily episodes). But I'm not sure why they didn't work as sources.. Could they be used for dates and things like that? Because there are recaps from back to 2002. talk) 14:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Marcus Forrester Picture Hey...Well i just uploaded this file to see how it looked and to see if i could actually upload something and i didn't really go well i don't think i filled out any thing right...is there anyway I delete this [39] and could you upload this [40] again for me? Sorry I'm such a mess I'm a little confused. talk) 17:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Hi Hey! :) What do you think of the talk) 10:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Just saying Bye Just saying bye to you. I can't stand helping Wiki articles anymore with a certain someone thinking they're helping, when all they're doing is coming in and wrecking an experience and making articles the way THEY wish them. talk) 18:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Sources requested for Afia Hey Richie. Sorry to ask for this, but can you find some sources for Ping! 21:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] I didn't realize I needed to discuss it, it just seemed a bit weird to me that stepfather/stepmother/stepsons and stepdaughters are added but not stepbrothers or sisters. I didn't read your messages in time either. so am sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libby'smummy (talk • contribs) 23:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Todd Manning hi. will you do something about Llanview Citizen reverting to a contested image at the Todd Manning article? i explained why i object to it on the talk page. the image isn't even licensed correctly. 83.172.0.119 (talk) 00:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hmm. Have you spoken to me before? Anyhow, I'll look at it too see whether I agree or disagree. Obviously I'll comment in which ever way I think best.RaintheOne BAM 00:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] no, i saw you on the talk page. you and flyer appear to be the authority on the article. or main watchers. whatever. i edit soap opera articles sparingly, and keep watch of my favorite ones, like Todd. even if you prefer the image where Todd's face is too small to clearly present his face, the image that Llanview Citizen uploaded isn't correctly licensed. it's licensed to Wikimedia commons. i said that on the talk page. 83.172.0.119 (talk) 00:51, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Ahh I see. Well Wikimedia commons is the place we aspire to house content, the place where free content is placed. I don't think this is a free image at all - so I'm going to flag it.RaintheOne BAM 00:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Seb Miller and Shelley Sutherland Do you have any magazine stuff for those two? I've got their storylines for both tucked away in a document but It's impossible to find any interviews with or otherwise with Mitch Firth and the only stuff for Shelley that I can find so far is her return, which was essentially to facilitate Kirsty's departure. No biggie if you haven't. I Just wondered if you had. Conquistador2k6 00:51 23 December 2011 (UTC) Sadly, I don't really keep Issues of IS for more than a week or two. More fool me :). Jade, I could probably set up the story section in the near future (Helluva lot easier than Kim Hyde or Rhys Sutherland and I've tried both, Honestly!). There's some characters you either fall into working on or just can't quite wrap your head around. Conquistador2k6 01:23 23 December 2011 (UTC) Now you mention it, Chucking out IS issues is a slight regret for me. I had a preteen/early teens jones (putting it mildly, lol) for Isla Fisher at the height of her H&A fame (1996-97) and she was frequently interviewed in it. Coulda really kept some issues, I think she won sexiest babe at the '97 awards (Deservedly so!). But back to the articles, I'll deal with Shelley and Jade tomorrow. Conquistador2k6 01:43 23 December 2011 (UTC) your opinion hi... i want your opinion on something. I've been editing the Talk To Me 08:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Jade I have the SLs done (Didn't go overboard). Do you have the photo and ref to hand? Conquistador2k6 24 December 2011 01:33 (UTC) That's cool. No Hurry. I've already put the SLS in. Thanks a bunch. Conquistador2k6 24 December 2011 01:38 (UTC) Merry Christmas Mario is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas , whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst:User:Flaming/MC2008 }} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy Christmas 5 albert square (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst:User:Flaming/MC2008 }} to their talk page with a friendly message. --5 albert square (talk) 15:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Re: Happy Christmas Thank you! :) Merry Christmas! talk 05:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Merry Christmas from George! Happy Christmas Richie! Ich spreche kein Französisch, aber Google Translate sortiert das! Ich hoffe, Sie haben einen guten Tag auch. Wie Sie sehen können, Deutsch ist mein Zweitsprache! Ping! 11:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Merry Christmas! Have a good, happy and if necessary, drunken one! :)Conquistador2k6 25 December 2011 11:32 (UTC) Merry Christmas Merry Christmas, thanks for the message! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 13:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Free image Hi there, could you please upload a free image of Altiyan Childs? :) talk 23:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] I'm not sure what cafe opening your talking about, but if your having trouble identifying him he looks like this. talk 23:58, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Lol. Here you go. talk 00:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] That's okay. Thanks for trying. talk 02:09, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] Hello, Hola, Bonjour, Bonjourno, Guten Tag! Hey, I was wondering if you could check out this article so far and see what you think, I'm really loving creating it: User:AcidBrights/Sandbox6 --AcidBrights (talk) 22:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks :) Have you had a good Christmas?--AcidBrights (talk) 22:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yeah thanks --AcidBrights (talk) 12:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] HO Hey, I was wondering do you have any reception for Maddie's article, I've got some off the DS interview with ES, but can't find anymore at the minute.--AcidBrights (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks, I found some from the OK interview. Btw, what are you thinking about the 'Oaks in general at the moment?--AcidBrights (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, it's still my favourite soap and I never though I would have said this but I'm really starting to love the teens, when they are mostly apart or in two's or three's they work really well and are not annoying.--AcidBrights (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Neil is still the one that's growing on me, but I like the rest of them. I'm loving the freshers, they just feel so real. How do you feel about ES's vision for the show?--AcidBrights (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Well I just realised I put love about the teens, I actually mean't like lol! Anyways, yeah I prefer the older characters too and I can't wait to see all the females becoming friends, and what about the Osborne's getting the dog back?! I'm so glad Ethan's gone, the initial idea around him was good, but after going through three producers, I think he didn't exactly turn out the way that the powers that be wanted him to.--AcidBrights (talk) 18:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] In a little village called Chester... Hey, just to let you know i've created Maddie's article, and i'm really pleased with it and hope you are too. :) Btw, thought we could have a discussion about all things Hollyoaks here, if thats okay?--AcidBrights (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Hey have you seen it yet? :)--AcidBrights (talk) 14:43, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Thanks and thank you for the advice i'm going to try and find some more refs :) Btw, is there a bit of a debate about referencing storylines?--AcidBrights (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Oh right, lol I just started doing it because I thought it looks good! :) What do you think about Riley leaving?--AcidBrights (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yeah I thought that, but on ds last night someone said that Riley and Seth had been took out of the titles in the E4 episode and Mitzeee's shot was extended.--AcidBrights (talk) 18:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] What do you think about the current state of the Hollyoaks articles at the minute?--AcidBrights (talk) 19:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] We need to look at the positives, Jacqui, Gilly, Leanne, Liberty, Maddie, Silas, Diane, Rae etc, there all well written, quality articles that we have worked hard at. I've been thinking about the oldies articles too, I would love to do one, but there are not loads of refs.--AcidBrights (talk) 19:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] I do want to work on Frankie's article, but the date of her first appearance is wrong because: she briefly appeared in summer 2002 and then was reintroduced, and there are no sources for her first appearance actual date etc etc.--AcidBrights (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Happy New Year! Well, apparently it says somewhere that storyline section should go first so thats why I staretd doing it, sorry for not discussing it. Heidi needs more development adding. What are you plannign to tackle next?--AcidBrights (talk) 00:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey did you get my last message? What are you going to work on next and what do you think about the storylines going before casting? :)--AcidBrights (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I've put in bold so you can see it amongst the list. I'm on with Ruby's article again now as she has been in it a year tomorrow. It's such a shame that Esther's got no references, actually it's soul destroying as I love the character.. Do you think Will and Dodger's article would be next to create?--AcidBrights (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yeah I like Ruby aswell, do you think she has enough refs for an article or should we wait? What do you think about Will and Dodger?--AcidBrights (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sources requested for Tyler Hey there. Can I have some sources for Tyler please? You can leave them on the Ping! 22:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ] I'm kinda busy atm with H&A - might be a good few days if I do. (Plus he's badly acted lol)Rain the 1 01:19, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Happy New Year! It's 2012! I wish you a very happy new year. I look forward to creating, updating and expanding many more articles with you. :) x JuneGloom Talk 00:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Happy New Year Rain! Hopefully we can grab some more articles by the scruff the neck in 2012 and give 'em a jolly old clip 'round the ear! (Note; I've had a bit :) ) Conquistador2k6 1 January 2012 00:55 Saw head? Unless I sleep with a bag of tools, that ain't happening! :) Beside if you can't get mashed up at New Year; when can you? Conquistador2k6 1 January 2012 01:23 Head's fine. Stomach 50/50. And as for those Mags, to quote Alf Stewart "I don't have a flamin' brass razoo to me name at the minute!". LOL So, What's on your agenda for the coming year article wise? I was thinking of floating around a Brad Willis collab at some point... Conquistador2k6 1 January 2012 14:02 (UTC) Happy New Year + Help!! First of, happy new year my friend!! Hope it's safe and quiet. Aha. Also, Creativity97, who I believe is such the username, keeps adding the whole cast to talk) 19:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Reply Hey, it's Lauren lol. I don't know how to message people on here, so in response to your question why do I never reply? The answer would be because I don't know how to! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurenlouiselawson (talk • contribs) 00:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Your copy edit request at the GOCE Hello, Raintheone. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Stoke-on-Trent at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Braincricket (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sorry and Hny Hey Richiie...We haven't talk in a while. Sorry about that i will try my very hardest to get the pics but hope you wouldn't be sad if i don't - Anyway, HAPPY NEW YEAR :) You tought me a lot last month about editing so thank you for that and your support!! -Arre/ Talk To Me 10:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Hi..noticed you haven't responded..sorry if i upset you before (if i did) i was just in a rush and didn't reply to you.. :\ Talk To Me 15:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Hollyoaks Hey, do you think this source is at all useful for reception. I was looking at the sex is never simple section and was thinking about using it for Darren reception and Mercedes. Do you think it is at all notable and could you think of any way to phrase it? Thought something along the lines of "The guardian felt that if the serial were true to life then viewers would be likely to sleep with several people giving a "married woman" as an example and citing Darren as a character who was also likely to do this" might work but seems abit sketchy. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] One more thing can you move File:Tony1.JPG and File:Scarlett_Bowman.png D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] 2 seconds lemme catch up lolRain the 1 23:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] OMG, OMG! Have you heard about Cheryl's new big storyline I'm so excited for it, I think it will be really interesting and having characters decide to go to university later in life hasn't been done much on the soaps apart from when Susan Kennedy did it.--AcidBrights (talk) 18:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Did Colin Grimshaw slap Ruby or just push her into a desk? I thought just slap but i'm not sure..--AcidBrights (talk) 08:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] When I write about the plot with Ruby, Doug and Riley what can I call the section, because i'm not sure what it should go in?--AcidBrights (talk) 21:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Wanted your opinion on cutting the storyline section from Darren? After bending over backwards to source it the reviewer has suggested cutting it :P It doesn't really bother me though. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Is Darren still a student? He said he was leaving but then told Scott he was still a student a few weeks after that? D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Don't think so - wasn't he trying to be cool around Scott?Rain the 1 21:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Probably, i'll remove the template and it as his occupation and we can re add it if we find out another way. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Do you think User talk:81.174.242.34 is vandalising? They just seem to be adding random dates. They are active at the moment but have ignored or don't know how to reply to messages on talk pages. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:30, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I think Lewis is finished, are you happy with me splitting? D4nnyw14 (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Online file storage Hey, you seem like you might be able to help me out with this. I want to upload a load of PDF files and word documents to some sort of storage space on line that will allow me to access wherever I want. I could email them all but the files are pretty big and my email gets full quick, plus where I work all outsode emails are blocked. I could also use a memory stick etc, but work computers dont let me use them either. Do you know of a good site that would allow me to store files that are only accessible to me? GunGagdinMoan 00:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thanku, that's just what I need.GunGagdinMoan 01:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Ruby Can you have a look at my draft of Ruby's article so far please? User:AcidBrights/Sandbox3 :) Do you think the storyline section is okay? Ruby's storylines are quite complex so there is a lot of explaining to do around them. Or do you think I should shorten the storylines?--AcidBrights (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Okay, i've trimmed the storylines here: [[ User:AcidBrights/Sandbox7 will you see if their okay? Thanks--AcidBrights (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Thanks oh and can you remember what Ruby did when Ricky dumped her, did she put drugs in his locker or was it something else?--AcidBrights (talk) 17:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thanks do you think I should put that in?--AcidBrights (talk) 17:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yeah I am going to use those refs, thanks for reminding me about them. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 17:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Do you think I should remove the bit about Bart and Ruby joyriding and knocking over Jason in Ruby's storylines as that was more for Bart and Jason's storylines yeah?--AcidBrights (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sorry to message about Ruby's storylines again. But, am I right in thinking that Esther took the blame alone for framing Ricky so Ruby and Sinead would not get into trouble yeah?--AcidBrights (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Is Ruby's birthday on 9 January and do you know what year she was born?--AcidBrights (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Is it 1995 or 1996? Sorry i'm rubbish at maths. Btw, how great have all the women been together in this weeks episodes. I've been longing for them to become friends and i'm so happy with it. The Brendan/Ash thing was good, but a bit weird at times don't you think?--AcidBrights (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yeah I was a little worried about ES at first but she has done an amazing job so far and i'm liking the teens even more. Thanks for workin date out--AcidBrights (talk) 23:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey, i've just been reading that Phoebe (George's squatting friend), played by Mandip Gill is actually a regular a character and by the looks of it she's a really good actress who's done a wide range of work. I'm really looking forward to George's storyline, hopefully more refs will be avaiable soon so I can create his article, probably a long way off yet though.--AcidBrights (talk) 00:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Here: http://www.janehollowood.co.uk/page2.php?id=131--AcidBrights (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Todd Manning pic Richie The Todd Manning article needs an updated pic, the previous RH pic was taken from 10 years ago, and it's taken from a screenshot from the November 8, 2011 episode of One Life to Live. I'm compromising with Flyer and Llanview Citizen. Llanview want's an updated pic but flyer doesn't want one cuz it was in the current opening. The pic needs to be updated seriously. I'm not trying to be mean, the show goes off in one week, it would be good to have an updated pic of Todd Manning instead of one taken from 10 years ago. I hope you understand why I'm doing this. Soapfan2013 (talk) 07:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] That's not why I wanted the previous one to stay, but both of you know my feelings on the matter...per my comments on the article talk page. Anyway, Rainetheone, the snotty editor on the article talk page is really causing me to lose my cool. I'm not sure if I should mark the discussion as closed or what. I just know that I am beyond tired of these type of editors, as well as so many other things on Wikipedia, that I am even closer to dropping Wikipedia than before. I firmly believe that I will be done with this site this year or the next, letting all the fanboys/fangirls and shady and/or incompetent editors have their way with the articles I have either significantly fixed up or protected. Once these One Life to Live characters are on General Hospital, we may also have to fight to keep cruft out of the Todd article on a daily basis, since fans of that show are especially fancrufty in their Wikipedia editing, and since some General Hospital fan may try to add a Storyline section (filled with only General Hospital plot of course). I do not want a plot section in Todd's article...unless it is written in a real-world perpesctive (like some of the plot detail in the article already is) and is reliably sourced. I originally intended to add that type of plot section. But it's not like it's needed to understand this character and to get the general gist of his history. Not when the rest of the article goes into sufficient analysis for that. talk) 01:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Having seen what has happened in the past, It is a wonder this article is not on indefinite semi protection already. If the article is inundated with General Hospital fans violating the fancruft policy - then long-term protection is justified because it is a GA at the end of the day, it is too much for you to attempt to keep stable without any help. I don't think you should be forced to leave because fansite editors either. You just have to keep looking for the ones that may be willing to learn the trade and improve them. I've noticed that three editors have ended up working as a team now to improve Y&R articles. I think the team needs to be built like we did for the UK/AU articles. I know what you mean about intending to do something, there is never enough time to do everything - even when half the time I spend most of my day on here.Rain the 1 02:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thank you, especially for your continual support. But, as mentioned, fancruft editors aren't the only reason I've been thinking of leaving (the in-depth reason why I am thinking of doing so is still currently displayed on my user page). For the last two weeks, I haven't been on Wikipedia as often as I'm usually on it. I'm experiencing limited Internet access, but that should be changing soon and I should be able to help you more with reverting fancruft. talk) 04:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] hey Just wondering whether you can sort this Daybreak presenters page out that has been deleted. Quite a bit of vandalism has occurred to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Daybreak_presenters_and_reporters. JackJackUK (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I think George has already sorted it out?Rain the 1 18:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yes, thank you. Also, how did he revert to that edit, because I can't seem to? JackJackUK (talk) 20:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] If you use Firefox and enable Wikipedia:Twinkle you can click the "restore this version" link. Or and you usually have to do this with Internet Explorer - you just click edit on the last safe version and save the page. You could not revert outright because of conflicting edits from another IP Adress - so that is why it usually says you have to do it manually.Rain the 1 20:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] HELLP HI!!!! sorry i hope not to bother you. Well i know you probably don't know this character but its not about that..but people KEEP on adding subheadings saying its impossible to sum up 15 years of storyline into a section..its just terrible. Every time i try to trim a story line, they consistently undo it! What should i do?! Please Help..This is the article: Talk To Me 10:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Actually don't worry about it.. :) Talk To Me 13:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Our "Friend" The Sherrif Man, This guy (Mr "Should have been arrested/spend time in prison" edits) don't quit, does he? Probably marches around in a stetson and wears a little tin badge! :) Conquistador2k6 12 January 2012 00:03 (UTC) Even the Great Conquistador is entitled to a wee break from the site. I'm mainly dealing with the piddly crap barely anyone touches Category:Category needed (Somebody's gotta do it and if there's articles in there I care about like Music, Boxing, Wrestling, Football,etc, I usually dive in head first, I'm one of the patron saints of discarded articles :) ) . And Yep, I did contemplate retirement around October/November at one point due yto small disillusionment but as long as a UK/Australian soap opera article needs a birthdate, storylines, reception... I'll be there. Besides this place is like crack. I just have to muster up the strength do work on Rhys, Amanda, and Kim (The latter mainly because let's be honest, the guy was a block of wood). For now, I'm just doing bits and pieces. Treading carefully after the Grant Mitchell debacle got June's hulk up. Maybe we should sic the River Boys on our Sherrif friend... *Mockingly high voice* "Ooh, Irritating Psuedo-Law Enforcement Friend!" (No prizes for guessing which show that's from) Conquistador2k6 12 January 2012 00:32 (UTC) "hulk up"? What an unusual term. - JuneGloom Talk 01:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Instead of getting someone's goat or their back up or getting on their nerves, I just added the word Hulk. Conquistador2k6 12 January 2012 01:18 (UTC) Help with "Wingard" This member is continually removing the commas. I've reported them, but they won't stop. Help!! talk) 18:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] help Hey raintheone ..i was wondering. I read articles about it but its not clicking in my mind. Im so confused lol. Is there anyway to make "The Young and the Restless" part from this article's title italic? because i created the article and released that it should be in italic formatting. Thankyou i truly hope u can help :))) Page –– [41] Jar 08:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] oh and good news hey rt1 hey i feel bad i put it off for a while but anyway I've got my friend's memory card (after the Neighbrs tour they got pics as well) and now i just need to plug it into my computer (it may or may not work) and ill upload them to my flikr account and you can take it from there. Jar 09:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Jay Duffy - Hollyoaks This is a quick message to inform you I have recreated the article Jay Duffy. I am aware that you previously nominated this page for deletion when it was created by another user. I hope you can have a look at my version as I believe it is has been created and written in the proper fashion this time. Aaddaamm94 (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Talkback I can use the other infobox and pepper the articles with actors' names if you want. Writing in present tense always seems ungrammatical to me: Present tense is something you use when describing the plot of a work of fiction, I always feel when describing the fictional history of a character you should use past tense, especially when it's used throughout the rest of the article to refer to fictional events. I do look for sources but I never seem to find anything useful, maybe I'm just lazy and not looking hard enough. Sorry if you feel you're having to waste your time tidying up after me, that wasn't my intention. Skteosk (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Unfortunately writing the storylines in present tense is part of the MoS - WP:MOSFICT. - JuneGloom Talk 16:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] If "present tense is something you use when describing the plot of a work of fiction" - then that should apply to the fictional character - because they are a work of fiction.Rain the 1 16:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Victor Lord Jr. Why can't Victor Lord Jr. have his own section on miscellanious characters on One Life to Live. What sources do you need for a character, if you watched the show you would know that's true. Besides he's not dead he's alive DUH. Soapfan2013 (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] It was in that section originally - it was moved out without sources - No stable lists have big sections of unsourced information. Surely you can find some sources. I'm not sure how you can ask why sources are needed. This is Wikipedia and if you had not noticed you are required to provide sources. Just because you watch the show, doesn't mean they automatically qualify for a section. I just restored an old version of the table - If he didn't die, why was it there in the first place unchallanged for two weeks solid. Finally, please do not "DUH" me like I am empty headed. There is no need for it.Rain the 1 04:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] He didn't die dude, you want proof? Here read the recap. Everybody thought that he did die, but he didn't. http://soaps.sheknows.com/onelifetolive/update/id/14741/One_Life_To_Live_By_Allison_Perkins/ Soapfan2013 (talk) 05:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I did not want proof - like I said - I restored the old version before the new information was added. By new information I mean an infobox that is not needed, an image that is not needed and a fansite style run through about the character.Rain the 1 05:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 17 Deletion of Damien Roberts is reviewed. Under your request, you want redirect, correct? I have asked for history un-deletion and overturn. You can click the section title above. --George Ho (talk) 10:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey Hey, I was wondering if I could ask you a MASSIVE favour? I was wondering if you could find an Inside Soap interview with Paul Marquess from 2010 in which he said that Eva Strong's (Sheree Murphy) temporary departure (during Murphy's break) would not be screened due to the extra scenes being added around then. To narrow it down it was about late 2010, so October/November/December 2010 maybe? It would really help, and if you could find any other articles on Eva aswell, as I am trying to put right all the articles I made when I wasn't a very good editor.--AcidBrights (talk) 16:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Oh thats okay, thanks for looking though, do you have any other articles about Eva?--AcidBrights (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thanks :)--AcidBrights (talk) 18:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Talkback MayhemMario's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. -- Thanks. Mario 17:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Advice hey i need your advice. Do you think this is a reliable source [42] its from Soaps.com (she knows soaps) which i would never use; but it is an actual interview with Sharon Case (for the [[Sharon Newman article) and she is being interviewed by the site. What do you think? Is it usable? Jar 02:42, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] That is fine, interviews are okay aslong as they are not from a crazy fansite - they're one of the better ones.Rain the 1 02:45, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Disambiguation link notification Hi. When you recently edited Adam Cameron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Reynolds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] All things Aussie Look at what this kind soul has done - [43]. :) - JuneGloom Talk 23:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Not an Aussie matter, but have you seen what is happening at WP:EE? Characters being split from lists left, right and centre with hardy any discussion. <sarcasm>I'm going to create articles for Ashley Chubb, Norman Simmonds and Craig Moon. They have some development info and they were in a few episodes. Plus, I'm going to source the storylines section. That way the article is guaranteed to be great and the character will pass all notability standards.</sarcasm> - JuneGloom Talk 22:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I've been without the internet all day, have I missed much? - JuneGloom Talk 21:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Look what I found - [44] - JuneGloom Talk 20:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hammer already had a redirect link - Hammer (Home and Away). ;) - JuneGloom Talk 21:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] What is it with me today.. I'll use that one. Could you take a look at Casey's storyline section - is everything in order and anything that needs adding? I went off memory alone.Rain the 1 21:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Checking now. If you're ever unsure about storylines, the H&A website has a great synopsis section for each week - [45]. - JuneGloom Talk 22:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Looks good, I've corrected a few things to help the sentences flow a little better. Will you be adding anything about him being released or are you waiting until its aired in the UK? - JuneGloom Talk 22:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I should have thought about the episode guides, thanks. Without Backtothebay profiling new characters it is harder. You can add it if you like - I don't mind knowing. I watched seven episodes in one go the other night, so I'll know soon enough. :)Rain the 1 22:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Quick q, did you forget to add the ref to the new info in Phoebe's section on the 2012 Hollyoaks list? - JuneGloom Talk 19:22, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] No problem - [46]. :) I wanted the colours to match the school uniform. - JuneGloom Talk 23:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey, I missed you yesterday. Hope everything is okay. What do you think of the new image of Simon Wicks? I don't think it should go in the infobox, since it doesn't represent his whole time on the show and it's far too dark. - JuneGloom Talk 21:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Nice of Mario to point out to us that these H&A articles need improving...oh wait - [47]. - JuneGloom Talk 20:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I've got a little something for Sam, would you mind if I added it now? - JuneGloom Talk 00:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I received a copy of Inside Soap from 1992 today. It's full of info for Neighbours and H&A and there just so happens to be some info about Lucinda Croft for you - [48]. The issue number should be three instead of two though. - JuneGloom Talk 17:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Got a couple of snippets about Adam Cameron coming up for you, plus a few other goodies. - JuneGloom Talk 14:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Oooo sounds interesting. I do like being spoiled. :)Rain the 1 14:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Did you see what just happened with Recurring characters of Neighbours? No discussion, nothing. Unbelievable. - JuneGloom Talk 17:51, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Present for you - [49]. There's a mixture of articles in there, and they're mostly H&A. - JuneGloom Talk 22:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Now that is just great! Just got them all and that will keep me busy. I love that there is a great amount of info for Adam's return too.Rain the 1 23:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] If you were me, where would you put this - [50]? In the development section or in an "Other appearances" section? - JuneGloom Talk 22:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'd say that it will flow better in the development section. There is other information that would tie in with the part of the storyline.Rain the 1 23:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thanks. - JuneGloom Talk 23:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I have heard a rumour about a certain hunky cop returning to H&A. - JuneGloom Talk 00:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Do either of you have anything on Lachlan Fraser at all? So far all I can cough up are meagre reception pieces on his departure and funeral episodes (AFI/AACTA Nominations). I've combed our favorite news archives for something but have come up short. Conquistador2k6 Talk to me, Dammit! 14:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'll have to get back to you when I've looked more, I've only ever looked for his Emmerdale and Neighbours roles lolRain the 1 15:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I don't really know how or why it happened, but I appear to be expanding and improving Charity's article. Thanks for the new image of her, btw. - JuneGloom Talk 23:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I saw and thought you may like a better image. I did start doing a bit for Debbie as I had saved some things for her - but not sure how commited I'll be. I had a go at Billy Hopwood too because I really liked the character. Btw - I only need to watch four more episodes of Home and Away, then I'll be on the same episode as you - I'll do that tonight. I've wrote the minor characters down for the last twenty odd eps I watched so should be able to add some to the 2011 list soon.Rain the 1 23:46, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Tweeted you about today's sightings. - JuneGloom Talk 00:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Should this character - [51] - be added to the Hollyoaks cast list? - JuneGloom Talk 22:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I think extra eyes will be needed at Sharon Watts soon. - JuneGloom Talk 20:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Don't hate me, but I think I may have been too hasty in merging Pam Willis' article back to the list. In the last mag I've looked in I found some casting info and a couple of the other mags have storyline info. I think I may also have enough info to save Gaby and improve my draft of Brad. - JuneGloom Talk 16:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] When you have a spare moment, could you find a new image for Sophie Ramsay's article? - JuneGloom Talk 22:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yeah sure, I'll get to it.Rain the 1 23:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] SW and JM pictures I was hoping someone will upload recent pictures of them two. Thank you very much :) talk 23:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] HO Hey, can I ask a favour, I know its another one, but i've decided to start improving Cheryl Brady's article and I was wondering if you could find the article where PM said Cheryl was being used in the wrong way and he wanted her to become a central character? I hope thats ok :)--AcidBrights (talk) 13:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Actually, its okay you dont have to look for the article as i've noticed I might start getting bogged down again in loads of different articles, so I'd rather think about what I am going to do next. Sorry for any inconvenience. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hmm, okay then. I'll maybe look for it later still just incase you change your mind. lolRain the 1 15:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Check your PMs :) D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Stay outta my convos Can you do me a favor and stay outta my convos? Thanx Soapfan2013 (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I am well with in my rights to voice my opinion where I see fit. This is Wikipedia, like those images, you do not own these conversations. I was simply explaining the basics about non free content - because you were under the impression that you own the content. If I carry out the favour I will be endorsing copyright violations - so I would rather not.Rain the 1 07:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Damian Roberts now restored Don't feel so guilty for your hard work. Instead, the WP:REFUND, according to restorer. --George Ho (talk) 20:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I noticed and to be fair - I do not feel guilty about hard work and did not see much point of the deletion review either.Rain the 1 21:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] User:Soapfan2013 This user is using the excuse: "SoapCentral and twitter are allowed cuz I said so. If you don't like it tough beans". Well I reported them to TALK! 01:48, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Ruby Oh hi..i was just randomly reading wikipedia pages on H&A and it says in the text that her on-screen debut was June 6, but her first appearance was June 20 in the info-box, and i assumed onscreen debut and first appearance is the same thing.. Sorry, correct me if im wrong it just seemed odd. :\ apologies for any wrong..Get back to me Jar 05:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Mercy McQueen Hi, is there anything in Mercy's storylines that you think is unimportant? I was thinking about trying to get it to GA although it needs work but the thing that screams out at me is the size of the sl section, its huge. She has done alot but i'm not really sure whats necessary and whats not, any advice would be appreciated. Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I've split the reception section into Critical Response and Accolades but i'm not sure if it should stay, what do you think? I don't think any other HO articles do this but i think a few CS/EE articles do. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Argh, what do you think i should do about the reception from Laure-Jayne Taylor from Inside Soap, i attempted an quote box and it looks ridiculous, maybe a cquote thing? D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hi, would the Mercy/Silas and prostitution/false advertisement to fans that it was going to be a prostitution storyline which turned out not be storylines go in the Riley relationship section? Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I can't decide whether to include anything from here about Metcalfe being a sex symbol because of Mercy, do you think its notable? D4nnyw14 (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] George Just to let you know, i've started working on George's article in my sandbox: User:AcidBrights/Sandbox7. Don't worry I wont publish the article yet, I am just starting to compile and create the article, and it's going well so far and there is a lot of information.--AcidBrights (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] You knew I was working on it already, probably just a rehash of what I already wrote.Rain the 1 16:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Oh sorry, I ACTUALLY didn't know that you were working on the article. And your probably right, my version of the article will obviously be a rehash of what you wrote because mine are crap and your writing is far superior to mine. So, I won't carry on with the article...--AcidBrights (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I do not think your work is "crap" or think that my writing is "superior" to yours. Why would you think that. I compiled that information for a section in the 2011 list, I then notified Danny about it - you said you would like to take the article but not "tread on my toes" - you did say that - so I assumed you realised I was already working on it. It is not because I think you will do any less of a job than I could - more the fact I do not really get why two people should be doing the same thing - when the two people could work together or on separate things - therefor getting more work done in less time.Rain the 1 21:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for that info for Karl, what do you think about his article in my sandbox so far? Sorry about the whole George thing.--AcidBrights (talk) 21:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Don't worry about that AB. Yeah, it is good and is coming along quite nicely. I read it earlier and thought about seeing that poll in an Inside Soap I read the other day. So I thought you would like the information. :)Rain the 1 21:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] HEY :) heyy....i was just wondering. I'm no good at images and all, but I've been working a bit on the Jar 17:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] She has a category at Commons you can look at [52] - and you can use any of those - on Flickr there are some pictures of her, but they aren't that good, just madame-T waxworks really.Rain the 1 17:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] yea i know about that, but we are seeking better pictures for her article... On flikr (sorry im bad at copyright info / pictures i don't understand much of it) - how do i know if i can use the picture file? Jar 07:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Re:Platt over Turner Think of it this way. She's been on Corrie since August, 2010. For 8 months, she was Turner. Now, for 9 months, she's been a Platt and involved in more plotlines as Platt than Turner (True, the her selling Max plot was big, but still.) I think i've made my point. RAP (talk) 21:15 28 January 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Beckyscreenshot.JPG Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Talkback (revert if necessary) Hello, Raintheone. You have new messages at George Ho's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Neighbours Hey, I was wondering, at the minute i'm only doing Karl [Munro]'s article, but I would LOVE to create a Neighbours article, as I have never created one before. Do you think I would be able to create one, i've been thinking maybe Rhys? Actually, I would really like to make an article for Ajay, obviously I couldn't publish it live straightaway, but I would like to start building that up, do you think June would be okay with me doing something? EDIT: Or Priya maybe--AcidBrights (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Well obviously you can work on whatever you would like - but I do think checking with June is a good idea because she often works off line on new articles see. So like I've said earlier, there could be something else that takes your fancy. Plus she is usually very up to date with all the latest information in the Neighbours list characters. However, not sure they need splitting yet because they are quite contained in the lists. I think that Rhys hasn't really conjured up that many sources.Rain the 1 14:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Colours I nipped over here to remind myself where I had seen your name before but - woah! - I cannot read your talk page at all. Black text on red doesn't work. Maybe I am colour blind? - Sitush (talk) 06:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sorry about that, I have removed the red for you. :)Rain the 1 13:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey Hey, seeing your online, can you comment Mario 20:57, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Hey Wow, you've done a great job and I think it is ready to split off. Sorry about not replying straight away, I didn't get the message at first. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Peer review limits changed This is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review at backlog of PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review. While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussion here, the consensus was that all users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request. If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog/items. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] List of Casualty characters Hi there. As a regular contributor to Holby and Casualty articles, as well as having some experience with the user already from their edits on List of current Home and Away characters, I was wondering if you could spare a minute or two to pop over to Talk:List of Casualty characters and provide your view on some edits made by a user. I have reverted twice, but they continue to put them back and I would like to try and get a consensus to prevent an edit war. Thanks for your help. Adamiow (talk) 00:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Ben Richards Greetings. I follow HJ Mitchell's talk page and saw your post. I looked at these and agree that a merger makes sense. Of the two, Ben Richards (actor) has more citations, so I think it should probably be the article that remains after the merger. I've posted a merger tag on both articles and started a proposal on the talk page of "Ben Richards (actor)", which both tags link to. Hopefully this wasn't too bold to do. --McDoobAU93 20:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I have pitched in, thank you for letting me know.Rain the 1 20:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sources for Froggy Hi Rich. Just a quick favour, have you come across any additional sources for Cora online or in the mags? If you have spotted any, please let me know because I'm eager to expand Cora's article and hopefully bring her up to Featured Article status. Thanks bud, Ping 00:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I'll look and get back to you. Did you use that scan I once sent you?Rain the 1 04:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Orphaned non-free image File:Paulajulieeileen.JPG Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the Ping 20:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] please be respectful Hi there. I know Jessica. Not well, but i know her. Her birthday is not the one that you keep posting. Please stop reposting it as you are completely off the mark. I would appreciate if you respected that everyone has access and the ability to contribute to wikipedia and stop being so controlling. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bella86 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Excuse me? Just because I was the last person to edit the page, does not mean that I readded her date of birth. I have not "reposted" it. All that I have done on the article today, is attempt to revert an anon edit which as "is a Poo actress" back to "is an Australian actress". I have no problem with people wanting to "contribute to wikipedia" - but is that what you are doing. See you openly claim you know this actress and so far your contribs are all to this actress. If you would like to promote her, start a fansite - knowing this actress gives you no special rights on here. The problem I see, is if you know her date of birth is wrong, then you must know her real one - so why not just correct the information instead of removing it. Others have restored the informtion because you barged in and removed without any offer of an explanation.Rain the 1 04:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] (talk page stalker)It was me who added her birth date back as you removed it without any explanation. Please use an edit summary when removing content as it lets other editors know what edit was performed. - JuneGloom Talk 15:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sam and Diane nominated for deletion In the past, I have nominated any soap opera topic for deletion because... I do so. Over time, I have begun to learn my lessons of deletion recently by mentorship and suggestions. You and members of Soap Opera Project perceive my nominations as a crusade against soap opera; to be honest, I judge too poorly based on current state, and I can't make excuses on what I did. I continue, and I caused conflict. Right now, the "Sam and Diane" article is nominated for deletion, in spite of how well-written and well-source it is by me mainly, and I would like you to pledge your Soap Opera Project members to join in WP:N , before you comment in AFD. I can't post this message in Soap Opera because this topic is of a sitcom-drama series, not a soap opera. Nevertheless, that would have been well-worth pledging there. --George Ho (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey there. I'm not sure if it would be right for me to comment on this AFD. The way you constructed your notification of this discussion could be percieved as an attempt to influence me.Rain the 1 00:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Mercy Hey, is she officially a prostitute now and is she no longer a cleaner? D4nnyw14 (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] She was only a cleaner for that one week before she quit. She is on that website's books, so that means she is employed.Rain the 1 20:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'll remove cleaner from the ibox and add prostitute in. Thanks D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yup. Watch out for capital letters in ref names, they usually break the cycle.Rain the 1 20:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Awww ok. Do you think Mercy could get to GA? I've still got a few more interviews to add to development and it needs a massive ce. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yeah I think there is a good potential in it, after you've finished adding all the info it will look even better than it already does. Have you finished searching for sources yet? I always type in the characters name followed by every publication I've ever heard of until something comes up, because half of them are missed out in the general search. "A columnist for Pink News said that Mercedes was just distraught and unable to accept the shock her HIV scare. It resulted in Mercedes hitting "her self-destruct button."[53]Rain the 1 20:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Nope not yet, i normally use search engines on the publications sites. Would that info even be notable, where would it go? D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I guess only you know the answer to that. We all have different opinions - I just build little bits like that and find what others said about the same storyline and combine it.Rain the 1 21:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] If i do add it would it go in reception or development? D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Reception IMO - Adding outsiders views in Development sections always seems misleading to me.Rain the 1 21:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thanks, i'll decide whether to use it later, should i start a section for the prostitution sl or what to see how it progresses? Maybe i could merge Silas and prostitution into one section for now titled something like 'later storylines'. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hi, what you said about outsiders being used in development had me thinking about Darren, i'm going to move all the reception bits from development but do you think the fake death comparisons to John Darwin should be kept there or moved to reception as the development does directly refer to the comparisons or should all of it be moved to reception. Should Steph's storylines be updated to include Doug or not as i'm not sure if its important to her really? D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'd keep the fake death stuff - it seems a fair comparison - Some of Doug's can be used in a return development section for Steph.Rain the 1 17:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] She was nominated for a return award [54]. Do you think Darren's relationship with Suzanne is worthy of a section, seems really weak. D4nnyw14 (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'm not too sure about that one. Maybe a combine with Hannah?Rain the 1 18:04, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hmmm, it could be labelled Hannah and Suzanne Ashworth. I think if i do that then it'd have to go above Cindy even though both sls started after his relationship with Cindy sources about Cindy are still becoming available with it being revisited again and again. D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] When did Hannah and Darren divorce, was it 2010? Emma Smithwick has no idea what she is doing, she adds teens to everything when hardly anyone seems to like them. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I seriously cannot remember him even saying they got a divorce. and Do you mean because they interupted the scene of Darren and Nancy's vows using Jono and Ruby instead??Rain the 1 20:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I don't think it was mentioned so i don't know what we'd put, it must have been before 2012 and i'd probably say 2010 as that's when she left but we shouldn't really guess. Yes and the fact she wants the teens in every episode. She's letting her opinion cloud her judgement on who she be in how many episodes and when. She thinks Jono and Ruby are a big super couple but they are awful. She is completely murdering the show. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I know yeah and while they are sweet - they are not the big couple they are making them out to be - even at the end of the show when the announcer (who is obviously told to say) "you can catch up with the latest Juby info over at e4.com/hollyoaks" he doesn't buy it either. For me - George and Callum work, I am looking foward to their scenes next week - i assume the kane family are moving into the the old ashworth/osborne house.Rain the 1 03:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] It'll be good to have another proper family, Emma Smithwick should make use of the families she has and bring a few more in. I like George even though i hated him to begin with, Callum and Tilly are likeable too, don't really like the rest. D4nnyw14 (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Whats happening with the Hollyoaks page revamp? I've only just remembered that we started this, are we going to continue? D4nnyw14 (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Is George's mum recurring or a one of appearance? D4nnyw14 (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Any idea? D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] *Tumbleweed* D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Do you think Rob Owen should be redirected? Do you know if Metcalfe has done any interviews in any soap magazine recently about the prostitution storyline? D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] She did this one - [55] if it helps. You could always make a start on the Hollyoaks article, but I'm too into the Aussie zone atm. Rob mays well be redirected, can't say I've ever seen anything.Rain the 1 21:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the interview, i'll have to make a section for the prostitution, could probably make the silas section silas and prostitution. I'll redirect Rob, don't think i'll start the draft yet maybe soon though. D4nnyw14 (talk) 21:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sorry to be a nuisance, any idea who wrote the article? D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Ignore this, its not on the page so won't be anywhere else. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yup, they're really bad for not listing their authors.Rain the 1 22:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Is Doctor Browning present? The source i was using was this which is now about sugar intake and the pic was from when Lynsey found Mercy working as an escort for that man in the hotel the other day? D4nnyw14 (talk) 18:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I dunno - he could appear again when Lynsey is at work. In future it is probably gonna be a good idea to use [56] to archive sources to be on the safe side.Rain the 1 18:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'll try and remember but it takes too long to archive sources. I'll remove Dr B for now. D4nnyw14 (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Too long? Less than 20 seconds - pop the url and a valid email in and click sumbit - then it is saved forever.Rain the 1 20:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] But if your doing that for a few pages it becomes tedious :P D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:14, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] That it is - They do not allow more than 100 submitions in under an hour - I've reached that limit before.Rain the 1 20:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Any help on what needs to be done with Mercy before i nominate it for GA? The lead needs expanding, maybe cut some non important stuff out if i can, anything else? D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Do you have issue number for the Katy Moon interview with Claire Cooper, it doesn't have one. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] T Have you seen Twitter "Please follow @TeamDianeorama (Diane-o-rama) We want Hollyoaks Diane to be used more because she is amazing! Tell followers" :) And comment on the threads on DS :)--AcidBrights (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Followed.Rain the 1 20:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thats great. Could you comment on the threads on DS in the general discussion thread and [1] would you mind asking your followers to follow the account aswell please :) trying to drum up support for the wonderful diane! Btw, how are you and hows editing going?--AcidBrights (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Can I just ask - are you controlling the Twitter? Nevermind they're already following back.Rain the 1 21:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yea, I created it :) Emma Smithwick followed and tweeted! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] So, what articles are you working on at the minute?--AcidBrights (talk) 20:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] ATM, Julie Carp and some H&A. =)Rain the 1 21:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'm at a bit of a loose end really, struggling which project to take on next, i'm thinking something hollyoaks related maybe..--AcidBrights (talk) 21:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Aren't you carrying on with Leanne and Karl?Rain the 1 21:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Karl yes and Leanne seems a bit daunting to me at the minute but I am doing it, just lost a bit of oomph towards doing the article. ES tweeted me you know, I couldn't believe it! :) What do you think of HO at the mo?--AcidBrights (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I know, I follow her and noticed. She is friendly with the viewers. I think the show is really good, but I would like the teenage group to go away for a while now - they are boring with this whole driving storyline. Leanne is certainly quite a big project to take on.Rain the 1 21:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yeah I really like Emma too. The show's really good at the minute but we need the teenagers to have a rest and have the "older" characters onscreen, infact I really want them onscreen! Emma and Nicole Barber-Lane were tweeting one another tonight about a storyline for Myra and how Nicole was excited about the scripts. Thats very promising isn't it? :)--AcidBrights (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] That does sound good, she is always good at the comedy, would love a serious plot again like the old days. If you are stuck for something to work on that is rather quick - would you consider creating list section for either Neil or Scott? They do not have an entry yet and it is a shame on them really.Rain the 1 21:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Really? But there are zilch sources for US soap 2000-2005ish :(--AcidBrights (talk) 01:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Well there are other sources - ABC Soaps, Soaps She Knows for interviews, all the news archives over at google, Highbeam, Free Library - It is worth looking around. I have I wish someone would create Neil or Scott =] (I have done one for Ally, Phoebe, Annalise, Scott, Barney, George, Jodie, Dennis, Declan, William, Jenny lol)Rain the 1 01:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Any news yet? Hey, just checking in. Any news yet about whether the colour scheme for Ibox 1 has been changed, or will be getting changed? TALK! 20:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I put in a request at the help desk, while it was answered - it seems I should have placed the request on the template talk page - So I have now done that. Hopefully it is sorted soon. :)Rain the 1 02:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I hope so. I'm impatient. Aha. TALK! 02:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Orphaned non-free image File:Natalie Buchanan.jpg You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ). PLEASE NOTE: I am a helpme }} template, along with your question, beneath this message. I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page. Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] DYK for Ellen Lowell nominate ) 00:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Thanks for taking care of this, looks like we got a good spike for the old girl. But mostly I just wanted to say I loved this edit summary! Frickative 21:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] No worries - and I thought it was about time the image was put back where it belonged. PS Please visit more often, hardly seen you on lately. :)Rain the 1 21:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Sorry Sorry for not replying to your requests. I've been ill and not really concentrating :( I was wondering if we could clear something up: I'm revamping the 2010 character list (HO) in my sandbox and want to know, just for after i've completely revamped it, whose articles will be moved back to the list. I thought: Gabby and Amber Sharpe, Finn O'Connor, Seth Costello, Carl maybe?, Jem and Eva also a maybe?--AcidBrights (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Okay, I'm starting to add infoboxes to the list and stuff now, but i've decided once its finished and made live, i'm not going to merge Gabby back, i'm going to completely revamp her article. I've just remembered I started doing it last year offline and there was loads of references and I want to make it brilliant as she did feature in stories heavily reported on etc and if Poppy Meadow can hav an article after appearing in 28 episodes as a supporting character, i'm sure Gabby can have her own article, she was a regular, had storylines and info about paul marquess rejuvenation and appearing in more episodes than Poppy etc. Is that okay?--AcidBrights (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Soaps The IPs have killed off John Barton a bit early. Will you help keep an eye on his list entry, while I handle the cast list? - JuneGloom Talk 19:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Yeah sure, on top of the IP's - Brian is chipping in - what a mixture. ;)Rain the 1 19:51, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thanks. He appeared last night too, check out Mo Harris. - JuneGloom Talk 19:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] So he is dead now? And what happened there on Mo? I wonder what the edit summary said too? I'm missing out here. :pRain the 1 20:11, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] He's dead now, which is a massive shame. I'm slightly mad at myself for not creating an article for him before he went. I guess I can relax a bit and improve it. Ah, I see the edit summary was removed. I'll tweet you in a minute. - JuneGloom Talk 20:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I'm just starting to scan those early 90s Inside Soaps now, so there might be something for your 1990s H&A characters if they stayed around for three years or more. - JuneGloom Talk 00:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Tweet, tweet... - JuneGloom Talk 20:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] resp'dRain the 1 20:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] DM'd you. - JuneGloom Talk 18:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Just found you some info for Blake's article, scanning now. - JuneGloom Talk 01:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Here you go - [57]. - JuneGloom Talk 01:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thank you. :)Rain the 1 03:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] If you access that link again, you should find an article about Blake and Meg. - JuneGloom Talk 16:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for that, I want all the info I can get for Blake. Good work on Gaby btw. :)Rain the 1 17:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thank you! I think my next project will be Mel Hutchwright. I wanna see if I can save him from being redirected to a list. - JuneGloom Talk 23:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Was Frank really the first character to appear in H&A? - JuneGloom Talk 00:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Not sure, I thought it was Bobby myself. Going to get the pilot episode dvd out to check.Rain the 1 00:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Just looked and it was Frank running away from the police.Rain the 1 01:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I think that's a pretty cool piece of trivia. I haven't seen the pilot, so I was thinking Tom or Pippa might have appeared first. - JuneGloom Talk 01:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] [58] - Oh no, really? I can't stand Harvey! - JuneGloom Talk 09:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey Hey, I was wondering would you be okay to scan me any articles form the soap magazines on The Sharpes, basically anything and everything about them including Paul Marquess' interviews talking about them? I know its alot but I'm keen to get back to improving them and the articles should be between March 2010-December 2010?--AcidBrights (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I haven't got that many issues of IS from 2010, as I was still throwing most away!! The ones I have, well they are of no use for Gabby. I did find the one with Paul Marquess in the other day though. Please could you help with Freya's storyline section though?Rain the 1 21:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Hey thanks thats interview would be great. Of course I will help with Freya although she has not done much, they've just been bedding her in, Doctors build their charaCTERS quite slowly shes been mostly involved in 'Story of the day' plots.--AcidBrights (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] H&A 1990 characters Want/Need a hand? If not, I'll leave it to your capable hands. Last thing I wanna do is tread on any toes. Conquistador2k6 23:31 17 February 2012 (UTC) I was thinking I could get the ball rolling on Haydn, Maybe stick Michael in there too. A few other minor guesties from then, and maybe patch in Grant. I decided to err on the side of caution and ask you up front instead of invading your userspace. Conquistador2k6 23:41 17 February 2012 (UTC) Just finished Haydn with the limited material I had. I'll probably move on to some of the more minor characters. I might see if I can get Karen done tomorrow. Conquistador2k6 01:10 18 February 2012 (UTC) Sorry, Rain. Went to bed. Was knackered. I'll start Kim today. Conquistador2k6 09:19 18 February 2012 (UTC) FYI, She's done. She was only in a handful of eps but obviously made in enough of an impression. 10:02 18 February 2012 (UTC) Simpson first appeared in late '88 played by George Leppard when Bobby and Frank visited him in jail to invite him to their wedding and he disclosed the fact he wasn't Bobby's biolgical father (leading the the massive Don/Bobby/Morag reveal in early '89). Maybe when we do the '88 page we can add him there. Conquistador2k6 22:22 18 February 2012 (UTC) I've been reading the Summaries on Backtothebay.net, They're pretty accurate with the eps. Conquistador2k6 00:14 19 February 2012 (UTC) The IMDB info was a cockeyed error. It'll be rectified soon enough (Thanks to yours truly). If you notice on that site the preceeding and succeding eps to Kim's appearence aired in November that year. Conquistador2k6 00:23 19 February 2012 (UTC) Further reading suggests that Kim DID appear in November that Year as Sep 8th that year was a Saturday and H&A has never aired on a weekend in Oz. Conquistador2k6 00:23 19 February 2012 (UTC) Coughed up everything I could for Mullet. Additional Karen/Belinda content is scarcer than an Arsenal trophy win, though. Is Anything else in Books/Annuals/etc by Kesta? Conquistador2k6 17:26 20 February 2012 (UTC) Grant is pretty much taken care of. JG seems satisfied enough with his article and I'll deal with Blake and stick stories in the List until his main article is ready to go live. Conquistador2k6 18:04 20 February 2012 (UTC) Ben's our next big hurdle. Is there enough to get him kick-started anytime soon? Conquistador2k6 00:24 21 February 2012 (UTC) I'll put in the infobox tonight and add the SLs tomorrow. Conquistador2k6 00:29 21 February 2012 (UTC) Realistically, How long do you think before this page is ready to be born? Conquistador2k6 19:05 23 February 2012 (UTC) Emmerdale Hi. I've reverted back to my last edit on original research. But I'm happy to discuss any concerns you may have with what I've done. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Hi, thanks for sending me a message :) I like Hollyoaks, Eastenders Skins and Lady Gaga too :) And I'm a veggie too! How to I put an info box on my user page? Reply if you can, thanks DoctorWhoSkyrimFan (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Pippa Ross I apologise if my edits to this character profile over the last few days have annoyed you in any way. This is not my aim, and neither am I attempting to be disruptive. I am simply trying to build up the character profile to make it clearer and more interesting to a reader. One edit was to combine the similiar "Casting" and "Recast" sections (no text or content was deleted - all the information was simply moved so that any casting information is under one heading and therefore more straighforward). The second edit was to add screenshots, which are simply added to illustrate clearly the difference between both actresses playing the part. A similar technique can be seen on other Wikipedia pages - for example Back to the Future Part 2 where screenshots from Part 1 and Part 2 are used to illustrate the recasting of character Jennifer Parker. Thanks, Gari82 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Well apology accepted - but I'd like to remind you that removing casting information which was sourced is certainly not the standard practise around here. I'm not sure what the move Back to the Future Part II has to do with this either - WP:OTHERSTUFF - If the community is happy with that article using four non free images, then so be it. However, this is not encouraged in general - so I will not be endorsing the usage of any additional images being used on this article. I wouldn't say your edits are annoying me, it just saddens me that editors will blatantly IP hop to get their own road. For in the article, Pippa Ross You, and three different anon users all performed the same edit. Pippa's article has all but been of no interest to anyone, then you and these other IP's all come along on the same day - Which means you basically got away with 3xR. I'm not daft either, you come here to tell me that you removed no text or content - I am more than happy to pull up the diffs proving that you removed content three times in a row.Rain the 1 23:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] ( Other stuff exists essay. - JuneGloom Talk 23:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Thank you for explaining JuneGloom. Raintheone, I am actually saddened that you feel the need to attack me over what were honest mistakes in the process of trying to add to and tidy up an article. The illusion of my "IP Hopping" will likely be because of my forgetting to log in when switching between a home and work computer, but I feel your messages towards me imply that I am purposely trying to "get away" with disruptive behaviour and/or driving a personal vendetta to mess up articles. There is no need to take my mistakes personally, and your messages to me very quickly became unprofessional and scathing in tone. If you look back at our communication over the last few days, you will see that I took onboard all your points - e.g. replacing a "collage" of 4 images with two distinct screenshots. Similarly, since JuneGloom explained the difference between the use of two screenshots in the BTTF2 example and the Pippa article I now understand clearly why two extra screenshots were not necessary in this instance and will not attempt to reinstate them. The merging of "Casting" and "Recasting" sections, however, still needed to be done in my opinion (hence my final edit last night) and I'm glad to see this section has been expanded over the last 24 hours with some brilliant new information - Pippa Fletcher/Ross is such an iconic character and was such a central part of Home and Away, I feel it's only fitting that her profile page should be as informative as possible. Thanks, Gari82 (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Well actually, you have been a registered user since 2007 - So I partly, assumed that you would know the basics. I did not think that you took onboard the advice about the images - because you readded them again. I just thought you may have been warring because you edited under more than one IP. However, I did not think about something, that sometimes IP adresses can change for any one user. So I am sorry if I seemed unhelpful above. I should have better explained that not only was a montage of four images unsuitable, but the use of four image all together are not needed. I hope you understand why I thought you were disrupting though - as you removed the information about Carol Willesee's casting and clogged up the non free images. I guess that you are quite new to this then - If you need help, I'm more than happy to lend a hand. You seem genuine in your response so I'm more than happy to turn over the page. Have a nice afternoon. :)Rain the 1 17:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] H&A Peter Baker Sorry to bother you but you edit H&A articles right? Could you tell me how notable Peter Baker is, played by Mario 17:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] (talk page stalker)You want the article recreated? It's going to need a lot of work and sources, since it has been deleted three times. - JuneGloom Talk 18:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Oh, Okay, I can see what I can do, June, I dont mean to nitpick, but im rather confused about the H&A template, the character list parts on the template confuse me. Mario 18:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I have never looked for Peter, but I'd imagine so - He had big storylines. The list is just a list of all characters, but obviously you can view the past ones in it. Not our doing though.Rain the 1 19:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] (edit conflict)Nope, there's no mistake. The past character list got redirected to List of Home and Away characters, which does contain both past and present regular characters (it should really be the title of the current character list). Things became a bit jumbled due to a few AfDs that took place. There used to be a lot of unnecessary H&A lists for all sorts of things, when only three were/are needed. A discussion to sort them out should probably take place, but improving and saving the character articles is more important at the moment. - JuneGloom Talk 19:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I didnt explain myself then, what I mean is when you go on the template, Mario 19:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] No, I got what you meant. At the moment that list is the only one containing past characters, so it's the one we link to. - JuneGloom Talk 19:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Oh right, my apologies! So do you think Peter is notable? I mean i've never watched H&A before, so I dont really know, but thanks anyway! :D Mario 19:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] I don't know about Peter as I didn't watch H&A then, but Rain said he had some big storylines. It's just a matter of finding the sources to back them up. - JuneGloom Talk 20:26, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] He was in a coma, he married Amanda and he also came back from the dead. Maybe that can start you off in the search.Rain the 1 21:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Wow! Thanks Rain! Mario 11:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] SPI I only compared JMRH6 and Nocrowx with each other. The pending examination of a connection with them to Bankhallbretherton and Bankhall by a patrolling admin or clerk will have to be done on a behavioural basis, because CheckUser data is not stored indefinitely. WilliamH (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I was a little confused to what stale actually meant. So thank you William for explaining that. :)Rain the 1 17:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Frank + other collabs I see you've been working the Vampire shift on Frank good job so far. Although, I'm pretty sure Tom and Pippa didn't adopt him (the only one they bothered to do that with was Sal). Also what do you have in mind for our next collab? We pretty much double teamed the 1990 list and I think it's pretty much done and dusted, more or less everyone of significance has been added. Conquistador2k6 11:32 26 February 2012 (UTC) Count Rain's awake from his slumber then, is he? lol. That's the thing; stuff NEVER turns up when you need it. Considering Coard was a major fixture in the series for the 1st half of that decade it's criminal nothing surfaced earlier. BTW, That photo of him looks like he could easily be a Bond villain lol (People do age I guess). Belinda/Karen stuff is still pretty much Scotch mist. Combed the fairfax/age thing, and to quote the Spaceballs combing the Desert scene: "We ain't found shit!". Frank was basically an office assistant ala Roo and Martin (who got demoted to driver). I suppose perfection's understandable as our little list is not quite the definite product. Somebody had to factor in the "lesser life forms", Rewatched a few eps from then to get some info. Conquistador2k6 14:41 26 February 2012 (UTC) Richard Jasek Hello! Right, I've created a page for Richard Jasek in userspace, couldn't find anything for him here on Wikipedia so far - couldn't quite believe it! You can find it at User:5 albert square/Richard Jasek, I plan on moving it out of userspace in the next few days, was hoping to get more refs etc before I do though. Please feel free to add to it!--5 albert square (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Do you have sources for Blue Heelers and Home and Away - or is that backed up by the book source? If not that I'll add some. :)Rain the 1 00:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] I think that may be on the biplanes reference I have. If not then it's on IMDB.--5 albert square (talk) 00:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Oh yeah, he covers them all in that interview.Rain the 1 00:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] Re Sean Haha, that was a genuine mistake. I don't know why I wrote Daily Mail instead of Metro! Ping 21:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply ] It is okay, I did wonder though. I just had to redo that Reception info for Kate Mitchell btw, Digital Spy's Millar must have been in a rush because she actually implied that EastEnders is known world wide, rather than her character. So I'd always say - if possible - go with the original interview.Rain the 1 21:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] ^ http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1628335 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raintheone/Archive_3&oldid=1175212929"