User talk:RhoLyokoWarrior

civility. Because this is not the first time you've been blocked for that reason, the duration of the block is now 72 hours. You may resume editing after the block expires, but any further disruption or incivility will result in much longer blocks. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 04:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RhoLyokoWarrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I AM THE ONE BEING HARASSED BY A VANDAL. I filed a report and got ignored. What am I expected to do?

Decline reason:

Not a valid unblock reason, please see

our guide to requesting unblocks — Tiptoety ^talk 05:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RhoLyokoWarrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I AM THE ONE BEING HARASSED BY A VANDAL. I filed a report and got ignored. What am I expected to do?

Decline reason:

Looks more like a content dispute. Regardless, such edit summaries are unacceptable in any case. Please take a deep breath and calm down. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 06:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please calm down a notch. There are better ways to resolve disputes, but none of them are likely to work if you can't be a little patient -- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution lists some of these methods. – Luna Santin (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried. I honestly did. My reports were ignored. He attempted to file a false vandal report against me, when he would RV all my edits for no apparent reason, except 'lol you're using ' instead of ", so u r a vandal' Then he REFUSED to explain himself. The guy is clearly a troublemaker, and I am insulted that he doesn't appear to be getting punished. I should not be the one blocked. RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your reports weren't ignored. I even offered you a compromise solution in the previous section, which you evidently ignored. Not getting everything you asked for doesn't mean you were ignored - it just means you didn't get everything you asked for. And you're certainly not going to get it with name calling and edit warring. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 01:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't ignored here in Wikiquette at all. In fact, your entire situation was clearly looked at, even though you were unwilling to provide any evidence yourself. Even having read all your posts, I was still willing to take a chance to help ...

(drive) 17:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

How..

{{helpme}} How do I create new templates (such as infoboxes) RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A great place to start may be at

WP:INFOBOX; you could get a lot of great help in designing one there, and also guidance on what to name it, how to make it, etc. Hope that helps! :) Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 05:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Code Lyoko around the world

A

WTF? The article was just created less than 10 minutes ago, and you're not even giving it a chance? +rm the deletion tag RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 05:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Code Lyoko around the world, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code Lyoko around the world. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. mboverload@ 05:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THE ARTICLE WAS JUST CREATED! RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 05:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I couldn't help but notice your edits here [2] and here [3]. Those edits seem to be in violation of

Too late. Blocked for one week for this comment. Next time will be a month. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 06:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Due to this I guess we will not be able to hear your side of the discussion on the AfD page, Rho. If you would like me to transfer a comment please post it here and I will move it to AfD. --mboverload@ 06:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RhoLyokoWarrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not deserve this block- This guy is being rude and impatient, and Nothing of what I said to him was incivil. You're not helping anything by making this mistake.

Decline reason:

Per the discussion below. Obviously. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 06:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rho, I'm really sorry my actions made you feel that way. I know what it feels like to have an article that you made nomed for deletion, and it doesn't feel good. I'm not pandering to you, I just want to let you know other users have been through the same thing but have learned and become better editors for it. --mboverload@ 06:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, what you are doing is being impatient and rude. You nominated the article for deletion when it hadn't even existed for an hour yet. If anything, you're not being civil. RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 06:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no minimum time an article needs to exist before it can be sent to AFD. If you need time to bring an article up to par, use your sandbox. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 06:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Every time you request a block, you say you did nothing wrong. Clearly you did. Starting a sentence with "WTF" is a pretty good indicator of that. I'd think that by the third block and however many declined unblock requests, you'd at least know that you need to admit your mistake or nobody is even going to consider unblocking you. Continuing the personal attacks by calling Mboverload "rude and impatient" certainly isn't going to help. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 06:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't. "What the fuck" is not being uncivil in my case. I am offended that I am blocked for this, yet the truly abusive users aren't. RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 06:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thinking like that is why you will remain blocked. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 06:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like three blocks in nine days indicates that you really need to look at your edits and interactions with others here, or you're heading down the path to an indefinite block. Take this block period to re-think your approach. Corvus cornix_talk 06:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm being harassed by several users I AM BEING TREATED LIKE A PILE OF MOTHERFUCKING SHIT ON HERE, AND I WILL NOT STAND FOR IT. YOU LET THAT FUCKING ASSHOLE THE ROUGE PENGUIN GET AWAY WITH SHIT, BUT I GET BLOCKED FOR THIS? THAT'S FAVORITSM, AND YOU WONDER WHY PEOPLE HATE WIKIPEDIA? MY LIFE IS STRESSFUL AND FUCKING SHITTY ENOUGH AS IT IS, I DON'T NEED THIS FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 06:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=( I hope you have a turn of luck =( --mboverload@ 06:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your problems in real life don't matter here. Your actions on Wikipedia, and the way you treat others, ignore rules, ignore warnings, ignore advice, threaten others, and your attempts to erase legitimate discussions about your behavior, do matter. You may not need this bullshit, but quite frankly we don't need yours. If you have problems in real life, maybe you should concentrate on them. The359 (talk) 06:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IGNORE WARNINGS? I AM TRATED LIKE A PIECE OF SHIT IRL AND O N HERE!!!!! GO BLOCK PEOPLE WHO DESERRVEW IT YOU LITTLE SHIT! SUCH AS A VANDAL, THE ROUGE PENGUIN. YOU WONDER WHY PEOPLE HATETHIS SITE? BECAUSE THERE ARE TOO MANY RUDE, IGNORANT DICKHEADS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOEW THE FUCK AM I EXPECTED TO PAARTICIPATE IN THE AFD DISCUSSION OR FIX ANY OF MY EDITS IF I;M BLOCKED FOR A MOTHERFUCKKING WEEK FOR NO REASON? THINK!!!!!! RhoLyokoWarrior (talk) 06:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You treated people like shit from the day you decided to "take control" of the character lists of Code Lyoko. The first person to treat ANYONE like shit was, you, here. We blocked people who deserved it, you, who could not edit Wikipedia in a civil manner and discuss things with other editors. Instead, you told someone who did not match your viewpoint to "get lost".

We don't care if you can't "fix" your edits or be part of this AFD discussion. You should have thought of that before you continued to insult others and earned yourself yet another ban. If the edits need fixing, someone else will fix them. The AFD discussion wont be swayed by your opinion, as it is already likely to be deleted regardless of what you say. Wikipedia will continue to survive and work while you are banned. The359 (talk) 06:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to

We already have a list of programs broadcast by Disney Channel. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]