User talk:Ribonucleic

I saw you still had no welcome message.

Welcome!

Hello, Ribonucleic, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Source seems good to me. Thanks, Garion96 (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

in the 911 conspiracy article you wrote about the Zogby poll. I think this should not be mentioned at this point because the question posed is so vague: it does not discern between cover-up and complicity. Wikipedia is not for debating, it is for presenting the facts. The Zogby facts stand for themselves, and should be in a seperate section. Agree? — Xiutwel (talk) 08:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The wording of the poll question sucks, no doubt. And creationism puts up good numbers too - so I'm not prepared to have everything settled by a popularity contest. But especially given the perjorative flavor of "conspiracy theory", I think it's important to establish that we're not talking flat-earth numbers here. I like where you've moved it though - not just better NPOV but improves organization. Thanks. Ribonucleic 15:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was just curious what might have drawn them to your attention - since your contribution history doesn't suggest an emphasis on the culinary.

Snort. I have over 10,000 edits, so trust me, there's a lot of culinary edits in there (like Ken Hom, Ruth Reichl, Michael Ruhlman, and Chez Panisse -- note the photo). Hell, I've even dined at an Iron Chef restaurant (Massa, in Tokyo).

In any case, I stumbled over the

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. .

So, whats the lesson? No more of this. Toodles. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 17:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the repeat -- I don't know the protocol here, just an observer, but in reading this far -- and after your comment, Ribonucleic, to whit, "The pattern of your zealous contributions here makes it clear that this bothers in you some way. But I respectfully invite you to deal with it." Ribonucleic 20:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)3, and particularly because TDC knows IP manipulation, perhaps this link may be an explanation: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/171006enemypropagandists.htm

Please don't link to attack pages as you did here. If this happens again, I will block you from editing.--MONGO 00:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

It's impossible to "prove" any one bodybuilder has never used steroids. However based on the comments of the person who the picture is of, It's up to wikipedia standards and the picture will remain. Please don't remove it again or I will be forced to notify an admin.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 01:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely cracking me up! Queerbubbles (talk) 18:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article will hardly stand or fall on its inclusion. But it is no more gossipy than the rest of the paragraph. Either delete it all, let it stand, or provide a different justification. Ribonucleic (talk) 20:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does it add anything more than what we already have? IMO, no even if we include Lohan's reply. As a result it should be purged on those grounds. Tabercil (talk) 21:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And Ribonucleic, please read the lengthy and heated RfC above [on the Lohan talk page]. A difficult consensus was finally achieved, and you should not tinker with it according to your whims without getting a change in consensus. So please feel free to discuss here [on the Lohan talk page], but do not continue to revert unless there is a change in consensus here. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I reverted your edit on the article because Olympic and World records are very different. Very often the world record is not set at the Olympics and thus two different people with different times hold each record. Cheers. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir: You may recall an AfD discussion last year for James Wesley Rawles. (The result was keep.) Well, now a wiki article on one of his books has been AfDed. Your sage comments, one way or the other, would be appreciated. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/How_to_Survive_the_End_of_the_World_as_We_Know_It Trasel (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an explanation for this?[1]--Cube lurker (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have gone offline, but I'm raising the issue at

WP:ANI#BLP_vandalism_by_longtime_editor.--Cube lurker (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Your contributions to Rand Paul have violated the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy for the following reason: miscellaneous defacement of a BLP [2]. Please read the policy carefully, and avoid making future edits which violate it. Remember that Wikipedia articles can affect real people's lives. We have an ethical and legal responsibility to ensure that biographical content is written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality and avoiding original research, particularly if it is contentious. Consider this your only warning, made pursuant to the requirements of this Arbitration remedy. Further edits in violation of policy will result in special enforcement sanctions, which could include restrictions on reverts or other specified behavior, bans from editing any BLP or BLP-related page or set of pages, blocks of up to one year in length, or any other measures which may be considered necessary. The WordsmithCommunicate 19:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Ribonucleic. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]