Article Wizard
.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk ) 23:16, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
Tommy 2010 23:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives . Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted . Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusdafax 23:49, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
talk) 00:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
wiooiw (
talk ) 03:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Article Wizard
. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pink Bull 03:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk ) 13:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Friginator (
talk ) 06:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A Thousand Suns . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox . Thank you. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 17:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Metacritic is not the arbiter of consensus. What we are trying to figure out now is the best way to describe varying reviews, though we've come to a stalemate on that notion as of present. A brief glance at the talk page of the article,
specifically this discussion , will show why two editors so far have reverted your changes.
ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 14:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at A Thousand Suns , you may be blocked from editing . For what reason do you constantly push against accepted consensus which was reached after quite some tumultuous debate without providing a single explanation for your edits on the talk page or, at bare minimal, in the edit summary? ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 18:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under
welcome page
if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
here.
Harry the Dog WOOF 16:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Please stop your disruptive editing . If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suicide Squad (film) , you may be blocked from editing . See talk page and seek consensus before changing again.--Earthh (talk ) 14:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
Metacritic is considered a reliable source for aggregating reviews, so whatever your objections are, they still are more qualified to summarize critical consensus about something than either you or I. It indicates the film received mixed or average reviews. Moreover, on RT the film has an average rating of 4.7/10, an indication of a mixed response. In the case of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice , there are multiple reliable sources claiming the film got negative reviews, but this is not the case of Suicide Squad. So please stop changing the critical reception section and stop adding unsourced content.--Earthh (talk ) 14:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
The file File:MossiMovies.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page .
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the talk) 01:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
[ reply ]