User talk:RightGot/Archive 2

Archive: Archive 0

See

You nominated Girlfriend for the 7th Afd. What happened?? Georgia guy (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold off on the AFD nominations until you become more familiar with wikipedia, as it is obvious that you are not familiar enough to make judgements regarding deletions. Your recent nominations of articles that you claim belong on Wiktionary do not, and you seem to misunderstand our policy. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 23:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed all your AfDs early as there was a clear consensus to keep, and some valid questions and concerns about your motivations and rationale for the nominations. Can I ask that in future instead of creating a mass nomination such as all personal pronouns, or a contentious one such as Girlfriend which has been nominated 7 times, that you test the waters with a single AfD rather than nominating 11 articles in less than half an hour? --Canley (talk) 01:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyjsmith (talk • contribs) 00:45, 20 January 2008

Another editor has added the "{{

There is nothing wrong with archiving by moving the page, I do it myself. But moving it to archive 1 then to archive 0 then blanking the redirect makes it look like you have something to hide. I've added a link to the top of this talk page so that other admins can look at your past warnings on your talk page. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 16:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at

I notice you haven't been editing much over the last few years, and came back to do an AFD. The AFD was in bad form. We don't delete articles because an event has passed, the hype surrounding the event is what makes the article worth having, not the actual "end of the world!". Looking back at your archives (which took some doing since you spent some effort to hide them) I see that sending stuff to AFD has been a problem for you before. I strongly suggest you just avoid all AFDs. They forgot to notify you, but this is being discussed at ANI now [1]. If you were to keep doing poorly considered AFDs, it would likely end in a block for you, so I suggest reading on policy and just avoiding them all together. If you think an article needs AFD, you might just to go the talk page of AFD and recommend or discuss it there, at AFD. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or possibly even broach the subject on the Talk Page of the article itself? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Book theft from libraries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Humblesnore (talk) 19:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ...William 23:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your contributed article, Fast food restaurant robbery

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Robbery – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ...William 00:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

June 2013

speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Fast food restaurant robbery. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. It is obvious you're doing this through an IP. ...William 00:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of MHS (high schools)

A tag has been placed on MHS (high schools) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Delete per

WP:DABABBREV

.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Safiel (talk) 14:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

April 2016

welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. — Gorthian (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, RightGot. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article,

List of oldest living men

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

List of the verified oldest men – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. J947 05:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]