User talk:Roderick E

A tag has been placed on Roderick Edwards, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

A tag has been placed on Roderick Edwards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Our messages might have crossed. If you reply here, I'll see it. Even at POTUS level,

WP:BLP1E. Of course, if your campaign does take off, it could become notable in its own right - that is, it could be notable for its own importance to the history of elections rather than for its message. It can be surprising what becomes notable and what doesn't. There are many big successful companies not in here (rejected, even...), but there is an article about a Scottish bus shelter. Peridon (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

You could take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophy Gardner for an example of how seriously things get taken here. Peridon (talk) 17:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Peridon for the even handed answers. I didn't mean to remove the delete notice, I originally thought it meant the notice here on this talk page as you can see I didn't delete. I understand about autobio and self promotion. As you saw, I attempted to keep the page as neutral as possible. The "Terry" fellow in question is Terry Jones. It is just a shame that a person has to do something outrageous before they are noteworthy.

Lastly, thank you for your kind of eagerness or at least fascination with what I'm trying to accomplish, and if I do reach noteriety level, I hope you are the one that creates the new Roderick Edwards page. Roderick E (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One of the joys of working on Wikipedia is finding out what people actually mean. Not your fault - there's more than one Terry Jones. [[Terry Jones]] links to the Monty Python person. Your one is Terry Jones (pastor). Yes, well. Unfortunately he is notable and to my mind an example of 'notorious' in its real meaning (as opposed to the hiphop influenced use as 'famous'). If he gets in, I could see him being the first one of this century to be assassinated. (We gave that up long ago. You only get another one to replace the one that's gone. Like in Burkina Faso - they've got the 27 year served president to step down. What happens? The head of the military takes over.) Thank you for being understanding. And for not having the arrogance that seems to go with being a candidate in so many cases. Peridon (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the here !

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rodericke.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated,

The file File:Rodericke image.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

low quality image used only for self promotion

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 08:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]