User talk:Sameer2905

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Valavanur railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valavanur railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 21:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kanpur Metro color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't move a page to a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page, as you did at

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Valavanur railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valavanur railway station (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

@Cabayi sir,

Thank you for making this change.

Sir I'll need another help from your side. Recently a close friend of mine @Sanjeev4125 had made new articles on the Vande Bharat Express trains and he's now facing an issue regarding the images due to copyright issues. Among those pictures there was 1 picture which was taken by myself and I had posted this to the VRT team. I informed them that I had given the permission to Sanjeev4125 to use the picture in Wikipedia. Kindly request you to look into this issue and allow @Sanjeev4125 to upload it to the Wiki page. Hoping to get your response soon sir. Thank you. Sameer2905 (talk) 13:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[ moved from Special:Permalink/1127758604 ]

Provide links. What issue? There's nothing on his user talk page. I don't have access to the permissions VRT queue. Cabayi (talk) 14:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi sir, the issue was that when Sanjeev was creating the pages and he uploaded the appropriate pictures for those articles, couple of hours later, those images were deleted using the "speedy deletion" method since it was copyrighted from different sources and among those images, he used my picture which I took and is seeking help to retrieve that image back. So I contacted the VRT regarding the issue. I thought that since you might be part of the VRT team, since you helped with the username change, I assumed that you could help me get the solution for this. But it's okay sir. I'll try to figure out someway and grant that permission to him to use it in Wikipedia. Once again thanks for your help.😊😊 Sameer2905 (talk) 14:27, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Sameer2905. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Mumbai CSMT - Sainagar Shirdi Vande Bharat Express
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:57, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sameer2905! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:57, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Challaghatta metro station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Challaghatta metro station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Timothytyy (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewa–Bhopal Vande Bharat Express until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @SDZeroBot,

Kindly consider deletion of that page since no reports have come regarding the launch of that express train. Thank you. Sameer2905 (talk) 02:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I got ur name given by Santosh. He told me about u. Bro can u give reply on messenger which i messaged u. Check it once. FI.214 (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hi, please do not make disruptive edits and blind reverts as you did at Coimbatore–Bengaluru Cantonment Vande Bharat Express.

• Wikipedia is not a personal photo album. If a image is uploaded into common domain, it is about which image is better and relevant. Simply because you took an image does not mean, you get to decide that it should be the one in the infobox. This is strictly not a place for personal preferences and do not push your
  POV
  . If all the images are uploaded by you, what is the problem here?
• As a good practice, there should be no references in the lead as the lead should summarize the article with citations given in the article. Refer to
  WP:LEAD
• Every statement needs one credible reference or at most two. Do not add multiple references. Refer to
  WP:CITEKILL
• Do not add empty sections as you did with Incidents.
• Wikipedia needs to follow accepted norms and terminology and do not introduce own terms like "Mini Vande Bharat 2.0 Express train". Also, there needs to be have a cohesive style and do use bold/italics only when necessary.
• A simple line on testing should suffice as too much trivial information is not required such as detailed timings of test runs etc. which do not add any value. Refer
  WP:TRIVIA
• Do not add repetitive information across sections as you did with the name of the halting stations both in the body and in the table.
• See also section needs to have topics closely related to the article and not a literal list of all express train types in India.

Please do reach out in case of any clarifications and add only information which is relevant.

Meanwhile, please familiarize yourself with

Dear @Magentic Manifestations,

Except for the incidents section, can't the remaining information be added? And I'm adding the references pertaining to that particular train route. I know that Wikipedia is not a personal photo album. Whatever information I've collected from the higher officials, I'm only adding those relevant information. Kindly allow me to add only the relevant information. Sameer2905 (talk) 13:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sameer2905, Please add whatever you feel is relevant within the ambit of the guidelines explained and do not do wholesale reverts. As I stated earlier, I do not claim myself to be 100% correct and I am trying to maintain the quality of the article. Apart from adding references in the lead and too many citations, you can go ahead and add relevant information to further the article. If you can be a bit more elaborate, I think we can come to a consensus. Looking forward to hearing back. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'll revert back to my version but modify a little bit with relevant information Sameer2905 (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the changes and whatever relevant information I can keep, I've done that. If any changes to be made, before doing them kindly let me know. Thank you Sameer2905 (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, While I appreciate your effort in expanding these rail-related articles, still you have not got most of the points what I tried to convey. I am making select changes and re-explaining the same below. You need to adopt these so that the articles are maintained to the required standard.

• Please read
  WP:LEAD
  ; Lead should summarize points from the article and it is good to have no citations in the lead with references incorporated in the article. Moving citations from the lead to the article with relevant statements.
• In case of citations, please try and include only citations in English. In case if it is not available, we can use other language citations. But as there are many references available here in English, regional language citations are better to be avoided (as audience might not understand).
• While citing references, please maintain a standard format as a good practice. Use "cite news" for news articles. You can refer to the changes I have made.
• Please do not include epithets such as "silicon city" which has no intrinsic encyclopedic value.
• Please try and refrain from using bold lettering in the middle of the article (unless it is for headers, totals etc.). You can use italics if necessary.
• I have re-added a few points which you had only added previously, say a line on "testing". Also, moving services section before time-table and halts to the section.

If you have any clarifications or comments, let me know.

Magentic Manifestations (talk) 03:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Magentic Manifestations,

I'm seeing that you are making changes in all the India-related pages. All edits before yours were being followed and my school friend @Sanjeev4125 is telling me that you are editing unnecessarily in that template. I request you with folded hands to stop touching those wiki templates as they had been kept in terms of the launch dates. There was no necessity of you arranging in alphabetical order. STOP at once please. For templates also you are creating unnecessary changes. If making changes for articles, then accepted. But you are changing for templates also? This is going beyond limits. Kindly revert back to keeping the orders as per the launch dates but not have the extensions added cause there has been no updates about the extensions. Kindly get this done and avoid changing the templates. Thank you. Sameer2905 (talk) 15:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

sock puppet

, which is a dangerous precedent and can get you blocked.

Wikipedia is an open standard with every user having an equal right to make changes provided it is within the guidelines. Also, try to understand that Wikipedia works on collaborative contribution, improvement and monitoring, has survived like this for years with rules having been developed over the years. So please do not preach boundaries or expect one. My aim here is to maintain a quality and standard of the articles and I had clearly taken the time to explain to you multiple times earlier as well. If you need any clarification or have any other issues, let us keep this conversation open.

In case of the template, Templates are normally used to group a collection of articles related to a topic and is normally sorted based on alphabetical order for easy reference (except time events mentioning date/time) as the whole aim of the template is to access it similar to a directory. While sorting in chronological order makes sense for a table listing all services which can be sorted whichever way required, it does not serve any purpose in a template as it will be difficult to navigate for people trying to find a particular train. For a template, sorting by alphabetical order or by train numbers makes more sense for easy navigation. You can refer to other rail templates internationally as well (e.g. Template:Named Trains of the Southern Railway). Hope you understand the logic of it.

Also, if any other ordering is used, it is better to insert a comment as well mentioning the same, so that people can understand that the ordering is different. The edits the other user account is trying to make is simply make cosmetic changes and not trying to add any value. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 05:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Magentic Manifestations,

Please take back your words for that "sock puppet" terms. He was stating this issue to me and I tried to find out the reason for that. I've nothing to do with this. What he stated to me was relatively correct cause he's saying that it should be arranged in the order of their launch dates. I convinced him to keep it as it is. That's it. Thank you. Sameer2905 (talk) 12:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

good article. Cheers! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes yes, I got your point @Magentic Manifestations mate. Cheers 👍 Sameer2905 (talk) 13:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]