User talk:Samforprospe

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From what I see here and at other articles, you are removing sourced material and replacing it with unsourced material. That is a no-go. You appear to be removing things on a

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangalore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bangalore, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's "warts and all" Jim1138 (talk) 08:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

have you checked the reference provided. If not why talk like this. i explained the reference provided doesn't match the article.

The reference does not "match" because the link is 404. Tried fixing it? Again, see

wp:KDL Jim1138 (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Please keep content on this page per top of my talk page. You left an inadequate edit summary. That is not an acceptable reason for removal. The slum content stays. See wikt:whitewashing - not acceptable. Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See

wp:KDL the slum content stays. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of tallest buildings in Kerala. Jim1138 (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bangalore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 09:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 14:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]