User talk:Scottydude

Welcome to Scottydude's talkpage on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit .

Wednesday 1 May

userpage · talkpage · toolbox · sandbox · userboxen · awards

Skip to the bottom

Leave me a message

Email me

Archives

My Welcome Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Hey, I RV'd your example - it's a good one, but if you check the discussion page/history you'll see that that keeping that page down to manageable size is like emptying the ocean with a teaspoon. Some editors feel really strongly and patrol this page for the constant additions - what is really needed is a page of examples, because there are thousands of good ones. Just saying. EBY3221 (talk) 04:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Italic text[reply]

Sure thing, I understand. Thanks for the heads up! I really didn't think to read the discussions. Happy editing! Scottydude _talk 15:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You, too! EBY3221 (talk) 16:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scottydude, I really agree with the points you made on the Main Page Redesign discussion, and was hoping you could give me a little feedback on my submission? Many thanks - My submission » Pretzels^chatters 15:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I'll put it on the talk page of your submission! Scottydude _talk 15:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scottydude, thanks for your kind comments. I made some changes and it would be great to hear your feedback on the results - My submission » Cheers - Pretzels^chatters 16:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, i hadnt realised, thanks for your help, its not finished yet, will be finishe soon with cited sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikefriday (talk • contribs) 19:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thanks for that. I have yet to work out how to capitalise a name in the title.

happy days

les Les woodland (talk) 18:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)les woodland[reply]

Sure thing. Scottydude _talk 19:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create the page in question, therefore I don't think your message to me was appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pagrodiak (talk • contribs) 22:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Since you have a cleverness that has avoided me, could you do me a small favour? A week or so ago I created a page about a rider called Arthur Augustus Zimmerman. I gave him his full name because sometimes people call him "Augustus" rather than Arthur. Too late I realised my error. Search under "Arthur Zimmerman" and you don't get Arthur Augustus, even in the disambiguation. And when I tried to change the title, I got a message saying there was already a page (in fact several) of that name and therefore I couldn't do it.

Do you have a knowledge of the jiggery-pokery needed to make the change for me? I think it would clarify things a lot. Please do help if you can. Thanks.

happy days

les Les woodland (talk) 05:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)les woodland[reply]

I've put "see also" tags at the top to allow easy access to the many forms of Zimmerman (

Augustus Zimmerman to Arthur Augustus Zimmerman so that a search for "Augustus Zimmerman" will yield your page. I hope this is of some help! Scottydude _talk 16:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The boy Arthur

Hi

Grateful thanks.

happy days

les Les woodland (talk) 05:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)les woodland[reply]

Please review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings, of course. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch. :) Looks good to me. --Seascic ^T/_C 04:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My userpage says that my staus is unknown. Schuym1 (talk) 03:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you

WP:BYC. Scottydude _talk 03:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

It still doesn't work. Schuym1 (talk) 03:51, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well than the last thing I can think of is to remove the script from

bypass the cache, re-enter the script and bypass the cache. This should make the links appear at the top of the page. Click one of them and this should save the page User:Schuym1/Status as online (or whatever you clicked). Another, more tedius option is to manually set your status by typing "online" "around" "offline" or "busy" on the page User:Schuym1/Status. If this doesn't work I can find you some more help. Hope it does! Scottydude _talk 03:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

It didn't save so I clicked save. Now there is no options and it still says unknown. Schuym1 (talk) 04:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It works now. Thanks for the help.Schuym1 (talk) 04:03, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But there is no options on the top.Schuym1 (talk) 04:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as using the options: I don't know what browser you are using but I would make sure that I am properly bypassing the cache. I'm going to ask at the

WP:HD for some input. Sorry I couldn't be of better help. Scottydude _talk 04:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

My skin is is the default, monobook. Schuym1 (talk) 04:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by Javascript page. I give up.Schuym1 (talk) 04:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :( By JavaScript page I just meant

]

I think the problem may be that the appropriate status subpages may not have been set up properly. As I understand it, the script just automates the process of making the necessary edits to the status subpage, but only of that page is set up properly. Does that help? – ukexpat (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, the script isn't running at all, the buttons don't appear at all for the user. The page works fine as the user manually did it once. Scottydude _talk 18:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to confess that I have shamelessly copied your userpageheader code for my own use. I have given you credit on the transcluded subpage (User:Ukexpat/userpageheader). Hope you don't mind!  – ukexpat (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats quite alright! I really like that heading. I even used it on my main page redesign proposals (1 and 2). I like the floating navbar at the bottom of your userpage btw! Scottydude _talk 18:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't take credit for the floating navbar either - that's the work of User:Gnorthup. – ukexpat (talk) 18:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me with my user bar -- I got it !

]

page on artist

Hello, I am not sure how to use your site. I wrote the material given below some yrs ago, but have not rcvd any response so far. Is it not visible to readers? Romano

Hello, I am looking for information on the British portrait artist Hal Bevan-Petman. I would welcome any input for my research. Some basic stuff is available on a website I started up recently but I require: Photos of the artist,and information on his wife Beryl. Of course, input on portraits around the world would be great! Please look up my website www.halbevanpetman. com

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Romanokarim" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanokarim (talk • contribs) 03:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on user talk page. Scottydude _review 14:45, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scottydude! Wikipedia:2008 main page redesign proposal was recently cleared of all design entries. You may want to re-enter your design(s), based on the details here. (You can see the old list of designs here). NOTE: A survey was conducted on what users wanted to see in the new main page, you can see the results here. NickPenguin_(contribs) 02:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes I like the main banner. The reason why I removed my comment is because I still feel it needs a lot of work. I would recommend boosting the color to the page giving some weight to the different sections. Another reason was that it looked like you couldn't type in a search on the main page but would have to search on a different page

]

Well thanks. As far as the search, is your concern due to the link that says "Search"? I could see how this would cause confusion to a new visitor. Also, I've considered putting some color in boxes but my original idea was to use the natural color scheme of monobook. Anyways, thanks for your thoughts. Scottydude _review 19:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to thank you for your continued support in the Main Page redesign project. Your compliments and suggestions mean a lot. Pretzels^chatters 16:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! Scottydude _review 18:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scottydude Thanks for your help and nice comments. I've got my page ready to publish but I can't find the "move" button you're talking about! Where is it? Do I have to click on edit this page first?

By the way, I created a link to a page (Panther Books) that doesn't exist, because I think there ought to be one. Is that Ok and if so did I do it right?

Also, there is one section here where I made a statement about the many people he helped set up their own publishing companies. This is based on the memories of my 4 siblings (I'm Gordon Landsborough's daughter) and the unpublished memoirs of a good friend of his. I can't substantiate it in any other way. Is it OK to put this in the article then?

Thanks again Idmc (talk) 00:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will reply on user's talk page with previous discussion. Scottydude _review 04:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I've deleted the offending paragraph!Idmc (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Let me know if you have any other questions in the future. Happy editing! Scottydude _review 15:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying but actually I'd like the divs to be centred horizontally... as in, still as they are right now (they look perfectly in 1024x768 pixels) but at least centred on bigger monitors (since, as they are now they lean to the right on bigger monitors, even though they fill the whole page on 1024x768) so there's still space around them but not as much as possible (a lot of space is wasted if they're vertically centred). -- Mentisock 10:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Sorry I couldn't help more. Scottydude _review 15:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you watch a user, doesn't that watch changes made in both userpages and talkpages? But I'm going to be gone one and a half weeks due to me being in HS and I have fall break and I don't have access to any other computer besides the school computer. If both can't be watched then I would prefer my userpage be watched before my talk page.

HairyPerry 15:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded here:

WIkipedia:Help Desk#Watch my Page. Scottydude _review 16:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks...Enjoy!!!HairyPerry 17:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't edit anything so you need to stop leaving me messages saying that I did. Send messages to who ever is giving you problems because it is not me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coller404 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page. Scottydude _talk 00:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey scottydude, I've updated my Main Page Redesign proposal substantially, and you had some really great points last time you commented - hopefully you'll see the effects of your suggestions. It would be great if you could comment on the new proposal, I'm really proud of how it's shaping up. Many thanks -- Pretzels^Talk! 08:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be sure to take a look at your problems. I'll let you know if I manage to solve any of them! Many thanks -- Pretzels^Talk! 16:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, I fixed the first problem but couldn't work out the issue with the Combined proposal. If I get some more time, I may have another go - I'm not great with wikicode tables. I hope the first fix was helpful, anyhow. Best wishes -- Pretzels^Talk! 16:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks a lot! Scottydude _talk 18:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

This is Jim "THE DAD" Keith and I had asked some questions regarding entering data or bio material.

No doubt, I am not a computer person, but for over 20 years I have been in the comedy business and have had some national exposure, etc...

One of the police officers I work with mentioned that Wikipedia had a listing for COMEDIANS and had me check it out. I saw many of the guys that I have worked with, performed with....etc, and thought it was a GREAT place for exposure.

ALL COMEDIANS push for exposure....more bookings, etc.

My main calling, is that I use comedy for a much better reason than JUST entertaining.....

For over 28 years, I have been speaking to first time offender juveniles via the St. Louis Family (Juvenile) Courts..........using a comedy based program to turn these kids around.....and maybe help them and their families have better relationships. Over those years......thru the courts, schools and where ever I am invited, i.e. churches, businesses, law enforcement agencies....I have talked to THOUSANDS of kids.....and adults. At 65, nearing retirement, I would love to take this program nationally. I have been discussed on Oprah, only briefly. The Leno show's Jimm Broggan has talked to me about my program....etc, etc....little nibbles............NO BITES !

Films, national television, national FUNNIEST COP competitions...I figured, even tho I do not TRAVEL as a comedian....I am a DAD and I have that along with my police career......I am locked into the St. Louis area.

Back in the early years, CEDRIC the ENTERTAINER, KATHLEEN MADIGAN, the SKLAR BROTHERS and I all did comedy for FREE on open mics in St. Louis.

I thought, WIKIPEDIA might be a place to let folks know.....about my LAUGHTER & HEART TUGS program.

Thanks,

Jim "THE DAD" Keith Jimthedadkeith (talk) 03:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user's talk page after receiving email. Scottydude _talk 18:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll in selecting five proposals before an RFC in which it will be against the current main page. You're input would be appreciated. ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - i'm a producer at the BBC World Service Radio in London, and i'm trying to contact a Wikipedia editor, or at least an enthusiastic and experienced user, who has strong feelings about the potential introduction of "Flagged Revisions" across the service - i gather from your contributions to a recent debate on this issue ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flagged_revisions/straw_poll ) that you and quite a few others oppose this development on principle, and i'd love to hear your thoughts on this issue.

Please get back to me as soon as you can at the following e-mail address, and thanks in advance for your help. <Name and email removed for privacy> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.185.144.122 (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yo

Endorance159 (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

.

Please go to

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Barbara Robertson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Userpagebottom.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

]

May I ask for your assistance?

Hi,

Are you still interested in the idea of at least some non-admins being able to view deleted pages? I understand that the proposal was shot down previously by foundation counsel; however I believe I have at least two possible answers to their concerns.

One possibility is to make this prospective (apparently the antonynm of retrospective although I'm not so sure) - that is to say that only edits deleted after its implementation can be viewed. For revisions such as libelous edits or copyright violations and so on, there can be a hard delete, lying some way between this soft delete and oversight, which will function just like a present deletion. Admins could also have the power to toggle a deletion from hard to soft (or to undelete) - so selected deletions made before this feature is implemented could be made soft.

The second possibility is to introduce a procedure somewhat like RFA where users are given permission to view deleted edits by the community. As admin privileges are currently granted not just based on trust in general, but also on trust that the tools will be used appropriately, there is a much greater pool of users who would be eligible to be given this permission.

And of course, it is perfectly possible to use both of these systems at once.

I have cross posted this to a few users who were active in the discussion in 2008 - I don't feel this is a violation of CANVASS because I have not made the proposal myself - the reality is I need an experienced Wikipedia with some "street cred" to make it. I already attempted to steer a discussion of a similar proposal this way, but sadly that discussion is irretrievable (see here - or even better, don't!). Because I have posted this to a few users, I would be greatful if you would reply at User_talk:Egg Centric/Proposal and perhaps we can get a discussion going!

Thank you!

Egg Centric 22:55, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. - silly me, I forgot to link to the original discussion in 2008. Here it is: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Persistent_proposals/Straw_poll_for_view-deleted

A tag has been placed on

, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Shortcut to the help desk's header template. No need for a shortcut.

Under the

, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Equazcion ^(talk) 04:17, 11 Jun 2012 (UTC) 04:17, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CAM Santa Clara Nursery.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:CAM house.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John's Korner Bar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John's Korner Bar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Epeefleche (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhythm X Official Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 18:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of James DiGiacomo

The article James DiGiacomo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any independent (ie NOT affiliated to his religious order or his university) sources to verify that he would pass

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:19, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Samaritan

The article International Samaritan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

totally unsourced article. Been that way for many years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Samaritan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 17:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Scottydude. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamorada.JPG

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Scottydude proposal.jpg

The file File:Scottydude proposal.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused Wikipedia screenshot.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]