User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 39

I think its kinda funny when they try to copy sentences from other articles, and simply change the same, yes! Shahid do you know anything about Transcendental Meditation♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Or do you think its a big con? I'm always suspicious about high costing courses where you must be taught orally.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:11, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading the David Lynch article and I noticed he was into it and checked it out that's all. Just some of the practioners seem super cool like Clint Eastwood, it must be a good thing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I can play this note for note (and behind nut bend for behind nut bend lol). here. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is just ridiculous... LOL. How are you doing my friend? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 04:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As usual, I am just busy and stressed out with school. So far, I have only seen Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara and Bodyguard - enjoyed the first one a lot, second one was nothing great!!! Have you seen any new films recently? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 01:00, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've brought up a Hulabaloo related issue at User talk:Jimbo Wales. Emailed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Followed by her sister probably... How many exactly? Surprised that Guinness were able to obtain proof of every bit of work she's ever done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar :) Really appreciate it and coming to Indian awards, I feel they lack credibility, as they don't give much importance. --Commander _{(Ping Me)} 13:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read

Hello Shahid. I think the writer's name is not a necessity. No policy states such a thing. Anyways, as you can see, the regular douchebags at the article are *ucking it again. Much like itself, article related to Indian Cinema are destined to be *ucked. With that said, I won't edit anything related to it anymore. Industry of mediocrity and hypocrisy. Regards, Scieberking (talk) 08:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment. Really appreciated. Scieberking (talk) 11:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Ra One - Response section". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guru coolguy (talk • contribs) 10:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject India for a Signpost article to coincide with

Hi Shahid. You are right. Please report the user to an admin, preferrably MikeLynch. Also, you could remove the tag from "Critical reponse" section. I'm keeping my edits minimal, and after the peaceful resolution of these box office and critical reaction disputes in which I was previously involved, I will quit editing stuff related to Indian cinema. Thanks and all the best. Scieberking (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And BTW, she's probably Ms. Meryam, and not Mrs. Meryam, LOL. Wondering what would be her response after seeing "it was Mrs. Meryam who did it". Scieberking (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shahid. How you doing? You may be right, but generally, there are three types of verdicts; positive (favorable, hailed), negative (unfavorable; panned) and average (mixed; lukewarm). As far as I'm concerned, Ra.One, an all-in-all Hindi movie, goes with mixed. Rotten Tomatoes primarily contains western reviews so I think the site's not very relevant at all (in the same manner as southern reviewers are irrelevant for Ra.One; sites like Behindwoods and others have panned Ra.One). You need to participate in the discussion on the dispute resolution noticeboard and reach a consensus if you want to re-insert "mixed to positive". Right now, everybody is acting against the consensus. For instance, even Eros official has clarified that media-generated first day revenue of 22 crore was false, and 15.5 is the actual figure. There was wide consensus on talk page to use BOI figures only, but new users keep adding the figures of their choice. Also, for the record, Enthiran, not Ra.One, is most expensive Indian film ever produced. Simple solution, at least for me, is to ignore everything. Regards, Scieberking (talk) 15:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How does a previously massive movie star taking one off appearances on TV shows not show that she was getting desperate? I'd say that is a pretty significant change in the direction of her career. And the article is there to provide a summary of her career, so of course we should show that if it was the case. Besides it is only one little sentence, it's not like it completely clogs up the page. If it was something that happened in her career, it should be mentioned. --

I am allowing the readers to draw their own conclusions and this is something that needs to be included for them to do that as accurately as possible. It was a significant step to enter into television, which I'm almost certain would have been viewed by contemporaries as a step down. And I really can't understand why you feel the need to remove such a small sentence - the page is of a sensible length, it doesn't need trimming, the sentence is relevant to Davis and her career...what's the problem? --

talk) 16:45, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I tried but, I don't think it turned out right. I listed 142.157.116.40, 142.157.116.49, 142.157.116.30, and 142.157.116.112. Then User:HelloAnnyong quickly closed the case, saying that he blocked 142.157.116.0/25 for two weeks. Well, that range does not cover the IPs that I listed. What's up with that? And what is the proper way to submit one of these cases, because another editor said I did it wrong? BollyJeff || talk 12:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How is blocking 0-25 gonna stop 30, 40, 49, and 112? And thanks for the info. BollyJeff || talk 13:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• See this,♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad. Had another dream with SRK in it the other night, don't know why LOL! Its not as if he is on my mind in the day! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing more than "

Semiprotecting the talk page is not quite justified. For the moment I suggest not reverting the IP's talk posts since the personal rants against you are just making them look foolish. Your recent revert of the IP at Talk:Preity Zinta does not look justifiable. If you know something about this IP from your previous experience, you might consider reporting them at WP:Sockpuppet investigations. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aw thanks, that means a lot. I do really want it to be a top-notch article so that's great to hear such positive feedback. It's a GA nominee right now, and I dunno - I confess I have started to like the idea of getting it up to FA. I've been looking at the reviews there though and it's a scary place! Do you think it has the potential? --

Wow, thank you. I know the page is good but when the FA process is so tough I still have feel sometimes like they'd find a million things wrong with it, heh. But you've given me confidence and I think I will go for it eventually. I'd really love it to be TFA on her 105th birthday next year, that's my wikidream. No rush though - after the GA I'll give it some time and do lots of copyediting and yeah, put it through a PR. If you have any suggestions on the page btw i'd love to hear them, and let me know any sentences that read a bit clumsily. --

talk) 10:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi again. About that sentence, I thought it was acceptable because it is referenced, but I guess how it's written right now is inappropriate (POV). I still get confused about what is allowed so long as you reference it, and what isn't. I'll reword it, thanks for the heads-up. Please feel comfortable making any changes yourself, by the way.

The GAN is taking ages but I suspected it would. It's a very long article, that's probably what's putting people off the most. I still want to go through with it because it presents an opportunity to have someone completely new read through the article and (hopefully) make suggestions. And believe it or not (haha) there are still things I want to add from books I've recently bought (the PR said I should make the use of sources as broad as possible). Also I know you think it's well written but I still don't feel confident it's quite FA standards yet (sections of it at least). And it would really suck to take it there and get lots of negative comments after I've put so much work in, so I definitely don't want to rush the process and only do it when I'm confident. Thanks for your interest! Are you a Kate fan then? :) If so, then you obviously rule. --

talk) 23:53, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh I'm glad to hear you say its neutral, I've worried a bit about that. At first I found it hard not to let fandom creep through. The main section that's annoying me right now is that 1970s one, I tried to do some work on it last night but I just looked over it and I still feel like it's really sloppy...gah. If you think you can reword anything better there, please please do!

I absolutely love Bette Davis as well, she was such a character. I'm only just getting into Joan Crawford actually, before recently I'd only seen her in Mildred Pierce and Baby Jane. She was clearly a complete diva bitch but that's part of what makes her fascinating haha. Bringing Up Baby is one of my favourite films EVER. It was the first film I saw with Kate in and I fell in love with her instantly. :) --

talk) 10:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I did some more work on the section this afternoon, after making that comment to you, and I'm happier with it now. But yes, by all means pick away at it! --

talk) 21:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I have compromised and left the majority of your edits. I understand that you worked hard, but let me clarify that you only worked on editing the work I put into this page. You did not add any new information nor did you even do much more than rearrange. The majority of the content found and included on this page was written by me. Please don't act as if you contributed more to this page than rearrangements. Thank you :) MarkAlexisGabriel (talk)

The page is still a work in progress. I do apologize that you find it "poorly written", but I don't. Also, references are being compiled as we speak. MarkAlexisGabriel (talk)

King of Bollywood, know for his brawny built because of Stallone. P-lease...♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:22, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thought he might have been on your watchlist!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:08, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid, I need your advice on something. If you take a look at the disambiguation page of Bodyguard, you notice that there are several films with the same title; these films were released during different years and hence it was okay to have it as "Bodyguard (2010 film)", etc. However, since now there are two films released in the same year with different languages: Bodyguard and Bodyguard, would it be okay to leave it the way it is or move these pages to "Bodyguard (Hindi film)" and "Bodyguard (Kannada film)" respectively? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 20:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno mate, see what the others say.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You mean this? Actually all of the text I thought agreeable exists now, so yes. Much better without his edits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't really know much about her..♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:45, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I said I didn't know much about her.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw your post on the actors and filmmakers talk page about the Jessica Lange article and I wanted to suggest that you make the same post at the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. That project is more active than the A&F one and you may get more helpful responses. Now I know your post was several hours ago so if things are being worked out you can skip this. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 15:56, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shabana Azmi was born in Hyderabad, and not New Delhi, which a lot of websites claim. The fact can be verified form several interviews of Azmi herself, and also from her mother (Shaukat Kaifi's) memoir, 'Kaifi & I'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choti.anki (talk • contribs) 04:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Scrapbook Invite
		Hey! It's good to see you! I have deeply cherished your warm friendship with me, and would like to keep a token of our times together in Wikipedia just in case I go out of touch with you. Hence, I cordially invite you to come and join My Scrapbook, a personal effort to keep all Wikipedians together and to promote WikiLove. I hope this invite receives you in hearty health, and that you can take as much pleasure writing on my scrapbook as I take when I remember you. Wishing an undying friendship, and a continued collaboration with you in Wikipedia. Cheerio! This invite is being sent to all those editors who have worked with me previously, and in the process have become great friends. Wishing everyone a great life and lots of WikiLove! My Scrapbook is no official WP page full of rules and regulations. It's just a part of my Wikipedia. To access it, you can go to my user page, open up the editing page for the user page and go to the (absolute) bottom. Feel free to write, post or simply tell me anything you wish, just as a way of remembrance and our friendship. This way, both of us will have something to take back and cherish. AnkitBhattWDF

Thank you so much. I want to keep improving this article, and a lot of others.

I'd rather not go back and forth with edits and edit summaries. I like your addition of facts (number of films and decades), but do we really need the phrase "seen as a cultural icon"? Isn't the sentence okay without it, and isn't it more of an editorial gloss than supportable by the sources? If you want to leave it in, fine, but I thought I'd mention it.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please visit this section of the Ra.One talk page, and provide a consensus so as to decide the future of my proposition. I will be glad if you also mention some comments regarding how to approach this (undoubtedly) longer and more detailed review. Thank you. AnkitBhatt^WDF AnkitBhatt^WDF 16:52, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited Indian/Pakistani singer/actor articles in the past so it's understandable if my name is familiar. --Geniac (talk) 02:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid, is there any reason you removed the edit about the song from Khamoshi being plagiarized. You can check the English version of the song on YouTube. What would be the correct way to incorporate this into the article? Best. Panacea 11 (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made a change to Filmfare Award for Best Actress, but it is also affecting Filmfare Awards, Madhumati, Vyjayanthimala and who knows what else. Since you are usually up on these, I want to make sure it is correct. According to the source Filmfare Nominees and Winners, it clearly states that Vyjayanthimala won best actress for Madhumati. Is this not correct, and if not wouldn't we need a better source? This source is usually good. BollyJeff || talk 20:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. It's pretty irritating when the official source gets it wrong. Looks like they have the years off by one too, though. I think we should add some of those sources to Filmfare Award for Best Actress to keep this from happening again. Thanks for doing the research. BollyJeff || talk 03:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DDLJ will be my next submission for GA. I hope it's getting close, cause I am running out of material. BollyJeff || talk 20:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever seen Bigg Boss? LOL how did a girl that beautiful end up doing porn. Sunny Leone is WAY too beautiful to be a porn star. She's too good to make out with those sleazy tattoed porno guys and gals. I read somewhere she's every Indian guy's fantasy. Not hard to believe... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, LOL we hear nothing of even the biggest blockbusters over here. Although Aishwarya Rai and Shipa Shetty are the only Bollywood persons who ever gets mainstream coverage and even that is sparse. Leone though is said to have appeared in Bollywood films, she looks like a Bollywood actress. She looks too wholesome and clean to be a dirty porno slut!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe see Mafia (film).♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. excellent job! I can GA review it if you want.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shshshshmeister, why didn't you say about Dev Anand. Started Vidya (film) and uploaded these. We can now upload images of any films pre 1951!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to get more of the missing ones started today. Good news is that in 60 years time all the images from Bollywood movies up until 2010 will be public domain and we can have freedom of image uploads from all Bollywood films!! Only thing is you and I will be over 85 by then on the way to 90! Good news is that in 6 years time we will be able to upload as many screenshots from Mother India as we wish.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This also means we can upload the whole films or clips of songs and feature them in the film articles. We need to find somebody who can upload them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll still pop in from time to time but I am certain I won't be as active!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of this? It might not be your cup of tea but its the soul of it you have to get.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've bought a DVD from this guy so I can learn to play 200 jazz songs like this. Don't you think it sounds cool? Clint Eastwood is a huge jazz fan too so it must be!! I just love the soul of jazz and blues, its like me in my element, it makes me about as happy as I can be! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, she's a good actress, not as good as Bette Davis though obviously! Well, jazz is a little abstract at times, not straight melodies, has a lot of altered notes and that, some people don't like it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is amazing.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will listen to it in a mo, can't get more beautiful than this though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's your favourite movie soundtrack of all time though? My favourite is easily this. Another Morricone, best composer of the 20th century in my opinion.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, she's incredibke, very husky sexy voice, I think she's actually one of the best jazz vocalists I've ever heard. The nearest to her voice is my own native Shirley Bassey!! She could have been one of the jazz singer greats like Ella Fitzgerald!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't seen it for a while. SPeaking of Jolie's family, how creepy and androgenous does her brother look. Its like he's not meant to be male LOL. He just looks bizarre.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong genes I think which accounts for why they look so similar. I look nothing like my sister! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See this. I don't even find her sexy do you? She's attractive and almost always very stylish but so not hot.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My personal opinion is that Salma Hayek is the sexiest woman in Hollywood how hot is she. Her Senorita Mexican accent makes her even sexier.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not like Salma Hayek?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, some might consider it gossip. I'm OK with it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This notice is being sent to inform you that there is currently a consensus discussion going on here. It will be greatly appreciated if you could participate in this debate, as you have worked on this article before and are familiar with its working and history. Thank you. AnkitBhatt^WDF 08:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/2.126.222.26 has been spewing hatred towards you a of couple times. BollyJeff || talk 01:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you find out the producer who won the award for

Prathap and Radhika Pothan. Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Commander _{(Ping me)} 15:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shahid,

Anupam keeps trying to keep Urdu script in all these Bollywood articles when it's completely unncessesary. I saw that you had a discussion about this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive124#User:Anupam_reported_by_User:Shshshsh_.28Result:_Both_warned.29 .

Is there a way I could add my vote to support removing and blocking Urdu script from being used in Indian articles? My argument is simple, read: hindi and english are official languages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_languages_of_India#Official_languages_of_the_Union .

Thanks for your time man, Demetriusss (talk) 06:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please sir, the ZNMD article is listed for a GA review right now and starting disputes isn't the wisest thing to do.

X.One ^SOS 08:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

]