User talk:Simesa

This user may have left Wikipedia. Simesa has not edited Wikipedia since 4 July 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{
  User wikipedia/autopatrolled
  }} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that he's back. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 04:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion about usage of nuclear power v nuclear energy. As an experienced editor in this field you are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LSST CAMERA scale 250x188.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LSST TELESCOPE SIDE VIEW 150dpi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Returnship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Returnship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Intertel (group) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I've just checked Google, Google Books, and Google Scholar, and there appears to be no reliable source with which to verify even the bare existence of this organization, much less to show its notability under

WP:RS

for ease of reference) on the article talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 05:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intertel (group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intertel (group) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I look forward to seeing you in the discussion. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 03:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Society for Philosophical Enquiry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Society for Philosophical Enquiry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 19:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't logged on since significantly before the big change, so bear with me while I re-learn the editing skills.

I'm somewhat surprised that Wikipedia was unable to find either Intertel or the ISPE!!! Both very much exist.

Simesa (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back aboard. There have been some policy changes too since you last actively edited, and indeed

not a directory, so we have articles about organizations such that there is plenty of independent sources about the organization through which to build an article with neutral point of view. Many organizations are too tiny and little known to meet that standard (including some I belong to). -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 16:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notre Dame Broadcasting Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notre Dame Broadcasting Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —

You uploaded, File:Shipping Cask 02.jpg. Wikipedia needs the permission to be explicit and proven at the time of upload.

Please read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm the permission you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally".Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risk analysis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  20:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Whole Barn Award.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of anti-sexual assault organizations in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of anti-sexual assault organizations in the United States (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]