User talk:Sinistrial

are you dumb? everything I added had a source--Sinistrial (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not be rude and personal about me. Utube inline links like that are not reliable sources for wikipedia.

Off2riorob (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

To be very clear; until you settle this dispute over the sourcing, do not add the material to the article. Discuss on the artlce's talk page, stop edit warring immediately. Kuru (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Off2riorob's edits are not vandalism, but are aiming to enforce our policy on

WP:Bold, revert, discuss: if your edits are reverted, don't just put them in again and start an edit war; discuss them on the article talk page, as Off2riorob invited you to, and try to reach consensus. If you can't agree, use WP:Dispute resolution. That's how Wikipedia works. Edit warring will only get you blocked. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Looking for a reliable citation Marina Orlova was a russian pole dancer (google) .. no nothing there. I will keep looking for you.

not every russian documentary has an online script translated to english.--Sinistrial (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no support for you to add your disputed claims, I suggest you take it to and ask where you have taken your other question, to the
  Off2riorob (talk) 20:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

You have failed to show how the russian documentary was unreliable, you've already been given over a week to do so.--Sinistrial (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Editor review/Dusti. Trusilver 21:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticizing someones edits in an editor review is not a personal attack, so striked.--Sinistrial (talk) 23:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were momentarily blocked by this admin through an error on my part. I believe I have unblocked you, cleared the autoblock and recorded my error in your block log. My apologies for the inconvenience.

Can you show me what you were referring to? Dusti^SPEAK!! 22:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have been warned about

WP:BLP/N. EdJohnston (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The article

Article Wizard

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marokwitz (talk) 08:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

August 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marina Orlova. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 15:29, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You broke it, lol.--Sinistrial (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orlova is known and notable for more than just her youtube stuff. She's got a book and has appeared on O'Reilly numerous times (although some would question the notability of that activity. Multiple edits and reverts is a nuisance, and not much more. For my part, I'm looking to make Wikipedia a worthwhile product, particularly in subjects which interest me. Orlova does a fine job, so keeping her article within WP standards is worthwhile.--S. Rich (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Rodina listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Marina Rodina. Since you had some involvement with the Marina Rodina redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Prodego ^talk 21:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]