User talk:Soll22

Hello, Soll22! _complex 11:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Getting Started
Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages User scripts

Sources

Please note that on a contested page like

_complex 11:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Soll22. You have new messages at WLU's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Well as I am going through citations, that many of the statements with citations are actually not supported by their citations. It's sort of a free for all interpretation. Interesting. Soll22 (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. I wouldn't be surprised actually. When the main page has settled down I plan on going through the sources and the statements they are appended to and doing a careful read. In the meantime, you should find sources for the parts you think were removed unjustly, and note the sources you think are misused. You can use a

subpage

to do so, it would probably be easier. That talk page is an effing mess right now.

If you want to

_complex 02:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks WLU. I have tried to find the book - it's very truncated on google books, so I am trying to find it in a library. I will def. take a look and discuss. Certainly the points and views held by this book are representative of a number of medical professionals. Will return to the topic once I find it. Soll22 (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userpages

Please don't edit (or create) user pages for other users, as you did at User:Nickjbarlow. Many users wish to have their user page blank, and doing this forces them to have the page deleted. It's also generally a faux pas, since their user page should be theirs alone to edit. This is just a friendly notice to let you know. All the best, — Jess· Δ ♥ 00:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry I thought that was a helpful thing to do. I am new here, and I thought they didn't realize that you need to create a user page. Just trying to help out. Thanks for intervening.Soll22 (talk) 01:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. That's why I'm letting you know! :) All the best, — Jess· Δ ♥ 02:03, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Soll22. You have new messages at Mann jess's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Jess· Δ ♥ 06:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting banned for disruptive editing

When I said that being disruptive like in trying to make a

WP:POINT could get an editor banned, I did not intend for you to think that you are anywhere close to that. Just that if the same things get argued forever, it could. A thing I had trouble getting used to when texting first came out, and when I started editing at WP (Wikipedia), is that you don't have tone of voice and facial gestures going with the writing, so it sometimes seems cold and indifferent, or just outright rude or threatening, when that was not intended. You are new, and seem to have a POV, but you seem to be sincerely trying to learn to be NPOV. If someone were to try to get you banned right now, I would argue for you, and you would win. But no one is even suggesting anything like that, and if they do, it will probably be in a moment of frustration, and they will likely apologize to you the next day. PPdd (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok, I appreciate it. I also appreciate your perseverence with this ongoing let's say, clarification of terms...I guess everyone else is out enjoying the day, huh? thanks for all the wiki refs you send my way. Yeah, sometimes if you read certain paragraphs of discussion if you're frustrated they seem more charged, if you're relaxed the menacing tone dissappears.Soll22 (talk) 22:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]