User talk:Squiddyonwiki

Hello, Squiddyonwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Below are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! User:Samoht27 (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Samoht27 (talk) 01:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Squiddyonwiki! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please avoid only citing to primary sources. HG101 is the only secondary source with significant coverage and that isn't even concerning the same game. User rankings are inappropriate to use in an article per

WP:USERG

and the last several sources should be removed entirely.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Papa's Pizzeria (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

Draft:Papa_Louie_(game_series)

I can currently add more within my development/gameplay section but cannot find if this source is reliable: https://gameluster.com/review-papas-freezeria-deluxe-sundae-fundae/

After doing a sweep it seems they have an experienced senior staff and employed writers, though I do not see it listed anywhere in VG sources. Apart from this though, I have added IGN, Apple, AG.ru, and other 'mixed' sources such as Dexerto, GameRant, TheGamer, and PCGamer. Squiddyonwiki (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Squiddyonwiki: I've never seen GameLuster used on Wikipedia before. I'd err on the side of "unreliable" - much of the staff seems like students or freelancers, and a few of the editors don't even have pictures. It screams blog to me and if I wouldn't use it for a major game, we shouldn't make an exception for a minor one either.

My source analysis: (1) is a database entry, so it doesn't count towards notability. (2) is a primary source. (3) is TheGamer, SIGCOV and counts towards notability. (4/6) is GameRant, Valnet site and doesn't count towards notability. (5) HG101, counts towards notability but SIGCOV unclear. (7) Dexerto, content farm and doesn't count towards notability. (8/9) are database entries, no notability. (10) is arguably a primary source due to the advertising motive. (11) PCGamer, a reliable source but clearly trivial coverage of the series as a whole. (12) GameLuster, probably not notable.

My overall verdict is that there is 1 obvious SIGCOV (TheGamer), and 1 that I don't think is SIGCOV but some might say it is (HG101). Given the typical basis of 3 reliable, significant sources to pass GNG it's not quite there yet in my opinion. Hope that helped. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I really appreciate all this feedback with in depth explanations. If you can tell I'm pretty passionate about this and am confident I can bring it to publishing status! Will continue to work on it. Squiddyonwiki (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Squiddyonwiki (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, looks like I've done all I can -- added a print source, other SIGCOV (TheGamer, HG101, Gamezebo, Pocket Gamer) ... going to submit, and hoping for the best. Appreciate your guidance and experience @Zxcvbnm Squiddyonwiki (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to allow someone else to review the page, since I already rejected your page once before, but I would almost definitely turn down this one too, unfortunately. I did note the additional GameZebo source existing before, but it is solely about one game rather than the series in general, and a ground rule on Wikipedia is that notability cannot be inherited, otherwise there would be a studio article for every video game simply because it was notable by association. There is precedent for lists being created out of otherwise individually non-notable things, but this wouldn't pass

WP:LISTN

either.

A common error with new editors is thinking that they can

WP:OVERCOME lack of notability with sheer effort. It's helpful to read the aforementioned essay there whether or not your page gets rejected. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I think that there is a possibility it also gets accepted because people have differing opinions on GameRant as proof of notability. But I vehemently believe it is not. There are just so many generally low-effort articles that they pump out that if it really was the case, we'd have an article on every Pokemon, every Street Fighter character, etc. but they'd all be bad. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Kiner Music. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 06:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks @Notcharizard! Newer here -- I've noticed when I use the basic {{ cite web }} edit to add a source that I've already cited, it re-populates and recognizes itself as a different source -- if that makes sense.

Is there an article that can show me how to cite something multiple times without having to fill the reference list with it over and over again?

For example, let's say I want to cite a source referenced as source #12. If I want to cite this source again, how do I make sure it's still cited as sourced #12 rather than creating a whole other number? Squiddyonwiki (talk) 06:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I usually use the visual editor for references rather than code, where you go to "cite" and there's an option for "re-use" (next to "manual" and "automatic").

Having a look at the code in a draft in my sandbox, it looks like the coding is basically <ref name=":2">{{cite web stuff here}}</ref> and then later to use the same reference you can just do <ref name=":2" /> and that should work. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 06:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! this was really helpful and I implemented it in my other drafts. Appreciate it! Squiddyonwiki (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Dinosaur Polo Club. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 07:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Dinosaur Polo Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On your user page it says "I mainly make/suggest edits in articles that I have a personal connection to or are related to my job." I'm assuming you mean things you have an interest in and learn about through your job, but I think be careful with wording, because on Wikipedia

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GirlsGoGames.com. Thanks! Mdann52 (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks review coverage from independent reliable sources to satisfy notability. Is there coverage from outlets such as those listed under

WP:USERG

and not really what you would use to assess how a game has been received.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Good Pizza, Great Pizza
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squiddyonwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MKsLifeInANutshell was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Good Pizza, Great Pizza
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:George Shea. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you! I'm unsure how to differentiate this from other George Shea's. No middle name I can find. He's an event host, public relations professional, MLE co-founder … which makes the most sense to tack onto his name? Squiddyonwiki (talk) 01:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Pizza, Great Pizza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Kiner Music
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Jon B. Simonis
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Jon B. Simonis
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

George Shea (Major League Eating), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 00:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peglin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rat czar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 17:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Conyo14 was:

While notability does exist on this subject, nothing was done to address the comment from May. The article provides lots of potential, so I hope to review this very soon with the updated details.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GirlsGoGames.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Conyo14 (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jon B. Simonis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horseshoe Island (New Jersey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Kiner Music, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Squiddyonwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squiddyonwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peglin logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Peglin logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in

Hello, Squiddyonwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Squiddyonwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squiddyonwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 06:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Squiddyonwiki. Thank you for your work on Kiner Music. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for a sibling duo of composers. Not all of the sources are reliable, but there are sufficient to establish notability. It would be helpful to link this page from others so that readers can more readily access the content. Regarding adding images, look into the rules at Wikimedia commons; it's straightforward if you were the photographer, but if not it is unlikely that something you see on Twitter would be useable.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 14:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]