User talk:Steam n Whistle

Hi Steam n Whistle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not sure what source your using to add him but, Dane Griffiths hasn't been with Cardiff since 2015 [1]. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I used Transfermarkt, but thanks a lot for letting me know,do you know who he’s with now? Steam n Whistle (talk) 12:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He was with Brecon Corries last year [2] but I'm not sure if he's still there. Kosack (talk) 12:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why has Jack Colback been moved to the Newcastle reserves? If that’s where he is, HE NEEDS TO GET MOVING! Steam n Whistle (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Liverpool F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Player included in source removed without explanation. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Smithies. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello Steam n Whistle. This draft does not pass our guidelines (specifically

Hello, Steam n Whistle. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cardiff City F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 18:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems as you have no intention of sourcing your work, I've dug up some sources myself for Konopka leaving. It would be very helpful if you edited cooperatively in future, cheers. Kosack (talk) 07:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I probably shouldn't have bitten so much. However, this is the second time I've had to come to your talk page because you have kept adding unsourced info with no explanation. Please try include references or an edit summary in future to avoid any confusion and such. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kyle Lafferty. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lucas Perri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

page is recreation of twice deleted page relating to footballer who does not pass

WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Perri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Perri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spike 'em (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi regarding this edit you made: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aaron_Wan-Bissaka&type=revision&diff=903999216&oldid=903999128, his club number for Palace was 29, but as of yet, I think this has not been reported for his new club. Please undo your changes if this was in error. Thanks GiggsIsLegend (talk) 10:14, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steam n Whistle. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 23:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Phil Jagielka, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Chelsea F.C.. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chelsea F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on

@Mattythewhite: that this user is still adding correct but unsourced content to BLPs. GiantSnowman 07:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]