How happy is the blameless vestal's lot, The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind, Each pray'r accepted, and each wish resign'd.
The article Field Day (festival) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Field Day (festival) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
RE: "What will happen next, we have the clues."
Heh, it's by These New Puritans. WELL worth a listen, YouTube "Elvis". Post punk at its finest. Also, I'm worried now that Kele's going solo, Russel's writing awful songs with some Yank and Moakes is in some metal band I can't remember the name of off-hand, that Bloc Party might be no more. Hope not.
Anyway, you going to T? f o x 09:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Their first album is much better to listen to than their second, I think. Hidden's a little too arty for my day-to-day taste. I also reckon if Bloc Party did get back together they're going to get more dancey still (which is a good thing for me, but I still appreciate how brilliant Silent Alarm was). Ah well...
That's a ridiculous number of festivals for one year! I was considering going to Rockness (it's only a hundred miles up the dual-carriageway) but never did. It's just T in the Park, my first ever festival, and my second ever gig. ;) Excited for it, greatly. f o x 14:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Really? You don't know a Bloc Party fan who doesn't like Flux? It's probably (bar Mercury) their most divisive song. I mean, I love it, but a lot of 'fans' don't. Ah well. I also think that was a fairly unreliable source. That was in the Bloc Party article for a while, unreferenced, heh.
Heh, I'm sure there are plenty! ;) The first (and only) gig I've been to was
Editors and The 1990s back in 2005... Ahhhh, memories ;) f o x 12:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
A letter off. But yeah, you're in Scotland? Since when? ;P f o x 14:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry about the slow response. Stuff came up. That's awesome ;P Probably the same tour. Nobody ever comes here these days; well, except to bars and things, and I'm pretty screwed then (the new law about under eighteens in pubs after eight usually shoots me right down, heh). Oh well. As for albums, I'm not good at predicting stuff (I'm usually about a year behind, anyway; only bought Only Revolutions and xx recently. Haha. But I like Kele's new one. I forget its name. And I'm heavily tipping Dog Is Dead for this year. Wow. f o x 08:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for The Edge Festival
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Wikipedia has recently created a new feature where you can purchase physical books which consist of all copies of the articles on the particular subject. I've taken the time to create one on the subject of TUGS which you can see here: Book:TUGS. All you see there you can then download as a pdf or purchase a physical copy of it which would be great for any TUGS fans. Hope you enjoy it and if you do want to add more to it or change some things about, please be aware that we don't want to clutter it too much with anything that although relevant may seem unecessary. --Victory93 (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Picture quality
Hello. I noticed that you are an active member of WikiProject Spirits. If you have time, I would appreciate it if you could weight in on the picture quality for Bärenfang on the talk page below:
, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SteelersFanUK06HereWeGo2010! 01:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SteelersFanUK06HereWeGo2010! 01:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:The Dykeenies - New Ideas.jpg
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a
bot
, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a
bot
, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a
bot
, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
If you search down here: 2011 in home video, says TUGS is being released. I highly doubt it but can we get any verification on this? I've been searching on google but nothing seems to match. --Victory93 (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah its looking alright. Well for the fact that it now has references and I doubt anyone else would in future try to improve it, glad that its you. --Victory93 (talk) 03:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Klaxons
Yes, let's not have an edit war, bit of a silly topic to have one over. I'm a friend of the band and I love the old version and find the later one almost un-listenably bad - something to do with the keyboard line they put over the top of it. Anyway, of course "re-recorded" is fine. Let's not fight. Happy New Year! Bienfuxia (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just wondering if any of these could help in improving the TUGS articles. As well maybe could we try to get the TUGS article to Good Article status and maybe even try to get it featured? --Victory93 (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've just requested the article to be reviewed so the possibility to have it become a featured article as well I added to the article the information from the SiF site from David Mitton. Might want to have a look to see if its alright as well the review archive you can see here: Wikipedia:Peer review/TUGS/archive1. --Victory93 (talk) 04:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know, there's an update on the article Wikipedia:Peer review/TUGS/archive1 if you'd like to check it out and see what would need updating fixing. --Victory93 (talk) 00:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
New TUGS article
Hey I created a new TUGS article: List of locations in TUGS. Pretty much squeezing out as much information as I can. Make any improvements needed if you like. --Victory93 (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey thought you'd be interested, fansite Sodor-Island have released a new interview with one of the modellers for Thomas and TUGS. Reveals some new behind-the-scenes information about the show. You can find it here. --Victory93 (talk) 07:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, sorry not been on Wikipedia in ages. Got an email about this (that must be a new thing I've missed!). Going to get back to writing in a big way fairly soon. Is that website now the de facto forum for TUGS? Good find and keep up the good work on here. --SteelersFanUK06AFC2k10 18:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well it's a reliable Thomas fansite which also features things about TUGS and of course these interviews do help explain some of the behind-the-secens bits about the series. It's probably the only reliable TUGS related site on the web. Of course there might be others but this is the only which gets updated. --Victory93 (talk) 10:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Z-Stacks Full.png
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a
bot
, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapel Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Farewell to the Fairground.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:29, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use File:Robert D. Cardona.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Robert D. Cardona.PNG. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:
Go to
di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WIKIBROS
Hey man, you edit wikipedia at all these days? I'm finding that since I'm not splitting my life between uni/work/fusion/iaeste/sleep I actually have time to go on wikipedia again :o
I've been trawling through policy pages, back-of-house stuff and projects as opposed to many mainspace edits.
I was thinking of copyediting this article, but wanted to recommend that it be renamed to List of Tugs characters so that it is consistent with other television guides that feature an extensive character list. -AngusWOOF (talk) 01:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the
WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412T 02:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Nomination of
List of minor Tugs characters
for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Tugs characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Z-Stacks Full.png
⚠
Thanks for uploading
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other Characters in TUGS. Since you had some involvement with the Other Characters in TUGS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Orphaned non-free image File:The Horrors - She is the New Thing CD.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been merged with the article it is most associated with and therefore doesn't need to exist.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Qwerty number1 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}
; see Talk:Field Day (festival) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
