User talk:Steviedpeele

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You've written this: "Imidazole is highly polar compound, as evidenced by the many dipolar resonance structures ", which I don't think is correct. Just becaue it has many dipolar resonance structures it is not necessarily polar - they might all cancel each other out for example - so I've removed this sentence. Chris (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reinstated the resonance picture, since we don't have anything better at present. I removed it initially because the arrow-pushing in particular can fool inexperienced readers that dont understand the fiction that is implicit in such images. A preferrable image would lack the curved arrows because nothing moves. Thanks for reminding me of my ill-advised deletion and accept my apologies if my edit seemed offensive.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem interested, I offer some comments that you can take or leave. Na2MoO4 is not an ion pair, it is an infinite polymer (few among us can draw such species, the reigning guru being User:Benjah-bmm27) Of course many people draw such cartoons for related species. The Mo=O and Mo-O- parts are of course equivalent (you know that, I am sure, since you like resonance). And finally, it's tetrahedral (d⁰ species tend to have point-on-sphere geometries). Again, do what you want with these comments. It's great to see you contributing. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well, the picture you present is indeed a great improvement over the what was there before, so the article was improved with your change. One step at a time. A further refinement of my comments (before someone jumps on me as well), the Mo-O contacts are usually considered to have significant triple bond character. And these structures of course depend on hydration, etc. The pic is fine and maybe, in some ways, superior to the almost impossible-to-fathom solid state structures. Most readers, like you, just want to know what is in soln. Kind of a picky point, overall. If we get hung up on being perfect, then no one edits. --Smokefoot (talk) 04:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{di-no source}}

A file that you uploaded or altered,

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Your upload of File:AA1662-Trinidad-preflight.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

The file File:Texbraves.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the