User talk:Sudip248
|
October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Babar mahal revisited, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.explorehimalaya.com/blog/baber-mahal-revisited. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
Speedy deletion nomination of Babar mahal revisited
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Raziman T V (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Continuing copyright issues
This article began as a copy of [1]. The rewrite remains an unusable unauthorized derivative work of that source. For example, consider the following:
Baber Mahal Revisited is a unique complex that can be called a museum of Rana architecture.
The article says:
Babar Mahal Revisited is a unique complex located in Babar Mahal.It can be called a museum of Rana architecture.
There are other passages that similarly follow too closely.
The source says:
Till 1996, the area where Baber Mahal Revisted stands, housed a cowshed and a guard house.
The article says:
Till few years back, the area where Babar Mahal Revisted stands,housed a cowshed and a guard house.
While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. So that it will not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".
Alternatively, if the material can be verified to be
Please let me know if you have questions about this. I am watching the article, and you are also welcome to contact me at my talk page, which can be reached by following the link after my username. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)