User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 16
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Royal Rumble 2008
If the Rumble match is confirmed, then you may want to tell me, why i cant find it here[1]? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diivoo (talk • contribs) 19:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- and where on wwe.com is the royal rumble match announced? Diivoo (talk) 23:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- yeah, but it has to be somewhere on the page, i still dont see indemand as a good source. i tried to point it out in the no way out talk page, but i just repeat what i was told not only once. and that is, that we only go by wwe.com in this project. [2] if you want to read it.
Diivoo (talk) 00:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Schools
Schools have never as far as i can tell been considered to be the sort of organisations applicable to A7. Please use prod, or just merge them. The ip guy does need watching, and I will do so. DGG (talk) 05:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
User and talk page
- I've also blocked the recent culprits for 24 hours for repeated harassment, although not sure if it was necessary to do that but all IP's, while possibly shared IPs were from different states such as New Jersey, Texas and Maryland - could have been a group of individuals. No problem for the semi-protection by the way--JForget 01:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
You may find this interesting
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Issue VII — December 30, 2007 | |
Project News
Current Events
Collaboration of the Week
The Dusty Rhodes (wrestler). Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, January 6.Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Member Interview
This week's interviewee is The Hybrid. The interview can be viewed here.
|
Member News
From the Editors
We sincerely hope that all of you had a wonderful Christmas/holiday, and would like to wish you and yours, a very Happy New Year! Contributors to this Issue:
|
You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. By default, the full newsletter is sent to your talk page. However, you have several delivery options at your disposal. Below are the options: |
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 90.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 91.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 92.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 95.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 96.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 97.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 98.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Bring on the '08
Happy New Year TJ! |
...Try not to drive though...--
Happy New Year!
P.S. Scientology LOL! They're gonna sue you... :) 19:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Have A Great Oh-Eight
Happy New Year!
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Battlebowl.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cooking Mama 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Fair use rationale for Image:Cooking_Mama_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
Please go to
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Battlebowl.JPG
I have tagged
Image:Ice_Age_2_Wii.jpg
I have tagged
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall Brawl 95.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall Brawl 96.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall Brawl 98.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 94.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 96.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 97.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 98.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 99.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BB 92.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BB 93.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 89.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 92.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Open Season Wii.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 94.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 95.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 97.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 98.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 99.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Happy New Year!
Season Greetings
Dear TJ Spyke, on behalf of my snow-buried Canadian region of Ottawa, I would like to wish you a Safe and Happy New Year 2008.
JForget 02:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Re:Beefcake shaves Adonis
Isn't that what
- Also, WP:YOUTUBE states that there is no full restriction on using th link, and can be used if it follows guidelines. I'd say it would follow WP:FU, as no free image could be found of Beefcake shaving Adonis. I endlessly searched for one... Lex T/C Guest Book 05:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, because the YouTube video is from the DVD (notable by the WWE logo in the bottom left corner) can we cite is as a screenshot from the DVD?
PS. If I take a screenshot of the exact moment from the DVD, the image would be exactly the same. Lex T/C Guest Book 06:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
My question is: Can we source it as a screenshot from the DVD? Like I stated above, "If I take a screenshot of the exact moment from the DVD, the image would be exactly the same." Lex T/C Guest Book 06:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok Lex T/C Guest Book 06:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weren't you going to wait for opinion in WT:C before you will nominate them for deletion? Lex T/C Guest Book 08:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
School move question
Hello, I saw that you're involved with the move requests, so I thought I might directly ask you your opinion. I want to move
- It seems like the target page used to be a copy of the current article (hence why it became a redirect) with no significant edit history. I would suggest starting a move request per the instructions at WP:RM. To be on the safe side, go for the full discussion (rather than listing it in the uncontroversial moves section). TJ Spyke 05:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Will do. Thanks. --Dan LeveilleTALK 06:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I didn't want to get too personal on the Naming Convention's talk page - but how ironic, I go to RIT. Do you go to college or work in Rochester? --Dan LeveilleTALK 09:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately no. I don't have a job at the moment (I am looking for one), so I can't afford college at the moment. TJ Spyke 09:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ohhh, well come to RIT when you get the money! Haha, then come say hi to me :P --Dan LeveilleTALK 09:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately no. I don't have a job at the moment (I am looking for one), so I can't afford college at the moment. TJ Spyke 09:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, since you were involved with the previous discussion, I think I've changed my mind. What do you think about this idea? --Dan LeveilleTALK 06:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
RE: Ref names
Well, before I changed the names, this message would appear. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer, use a descriptive title. Cheers, LAX 00:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Please have another look at Pecatonica High School (Wisconsin)
I realize that you commented early at this AFD, and that the article was in really poor shape at the time. Since then, it has been significantly improved, and now has nearly unanimous keep recommendations. Might you take a moment to review the article and AFD, and consider changing your !vote? Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 06:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:R2D
Hey, you made some changes to the
- WP:R2D is a guideline, and it frowns on replacing redirects with direct links. That's the exact reason that redirects exist for. Lex T/C Guest Book 00:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Royal Rumble
U guys on wikipedia shud chill out a little! I mean, I watched SmackDown about 3 hours ago, and JBL v Y2J was confirmed, along with Edge v Rey —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfcucl1972 (talk • contribs)
- You can't just add stuff without sources though. We usually wait for the US airing anyways since that is what WWE does. TJ Spyke 01:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just reverted it back to your last version. Don't blame me...--
- Wait until there is a WWE.com source before you add Jericho vs. JBL match. I have added a proper source for the WHC match on WWE.com. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I tried to but someone else was editing the page at the same time and it gave me an error. It is irrelavent. Wait until there is a WWE.com source for the Jericho vs. JBL match. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- What was wrong with my reference? As far as I know everything was typed correctly and it still didn't work. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I tried to but someone else was editing the page at the same time and it gave me an error. It is irrelavent. Wait until there is a WWE.com source for the Jericho vs. JBL match. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wait until there is a WWE.com source before you add Jericho vs. JBL match. I have added a proper source for the WHC match on WWE.com. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just reverted it back to your last version. Don't blame me...--
In the Edit Summary box down the bottom, how do you get the right pointing arrow with the grey coloured text? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 05:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes I figured it out jast after I posted that message. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 06:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
What point are you trying to make with your Edit summary for the Royal Rumble qualification matches? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 08:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's not a big deal. Add it if you want. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
What do you think we should do about Snitsky being entered into the Royal Rumble at the house show? It is most probably true, but not sourced anywhere reliable. Not on any WWE programming either. Maybe it wasn't a real match, just a crowd pleaser with no future meaning. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 11:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- So unless something is said on the website or on WWE programming, we dont add it? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- So iN DEMAND is an accepted source along with WWE.com? There is a website called www.pwmania.com which has spoilers etc and they are always spot on with news etc so I do trust them and they say Snitsky has been added to the Royal Rumble. I don't know whether Wikipedia accepts that source or not. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I will put him up there. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- So iN DEMAND is an accepted source along with WWE.com? There is a website called www.pwmania.com which has spoilers etc and they are always spot on with news etc so I do trust them and they say Snitsky has been added to the Royal Rumble. I don't know whether Wikipedia accepts that source or not. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- So unless something is said on the website or on WWE programming, we dont add it? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Reply Links
I didn't relize there was a problem with the links. But yeah, go ahead that's fime. :) Neo Samus (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- EDIT - oh you mean on the page itself. I thought you were talking about the talk page. I didn't put the info on the main page. I did notice that someone but the date for KOF '94.....which I just realized is the link you are talking about! LOL!!! Thanks for fixing that. Neo Samus (talk) 00:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Re KOF: Alright, thanks for fixing that, then. --LN3000 (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok I see the other edit you are talking about. What's weird is that even though StarTropics is one word, when I made it two it still went to the correct page. Neo Samus (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)