User talk:TanookiKoopa

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Peter Doell
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Peter Doell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TanookiKoopa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability still not shown. All the sources are either

WP:ROUTINE

coverage or passing mentions. We have two interview articles that are primary. We need to see secondary coverage of the subject. If he is indeed a notable engineer, then there should at least be one or two news articles about him. I also would remove any credits in which he wasn't the head engineer. Being an assistant on a recording isn't going to be considered notable enough to include in someones encyclopedic discography. These credits also need to be sourced with footnotes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Peter Doell
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Peter Doell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 13:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This person is notable, but the IMDB sources need to be removed and replaced with reliable sources. Please resubmit when that is done and this should be approved. Feel free to ping me on my page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tommy Vicari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tommy Vicari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Vicari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's

Referencing for beginners

. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The claims in the early life section either need to be supported with inline citations or removed. Ping me when that is done and I'll approve the article as the subject is clearly notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Rafa Sardina
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Rafa Sardina, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rafa Sardina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moogie Canazio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 21:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TanookiKoopa! Just want to let you know that per

          Thanks for pointing it out to me :) TanookiKoopa (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

George Komsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend. Thanks for create this page. You can add if you want the only solo album of Kiko. https://www.discogs.com/es/Kiko-Cibrian-Kiko/release/12552465 It's a very good smooth jazz album!

Cheers

Franlm14 (talk) 19:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out to me. Will do! TanookiKoopa (talk) 00:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review of the Request Edits at Talk:Adam_McKay#“Help_with_article_updates/corrections” Since I have a conflict of interest, I'm not supposed to directly edit the article myself. Would you mind either implementing the requests you have approved or giving me explicit instructions to do this on your behalf, as the reviewer? Thanks! Losangeles48 (talk) 19:28, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks for leaving me a note on my Talk page. I've checked again and none of the edit requests for Adam McKay have been implemented from this Request Edit: [1]

Is it possible you looked to see if you had implemented an earlier round of Request Edits, listed here: [2]? Another editor had already reviewed and implemented these but maybe you looked at it again?

In any case, have you reviewed this new batch? If so, can you give me permission to implement and/or could you do it? I do appreciate all the time and effort. Many thanks. Losangeles48 (talk) 02:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tower of Power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Garibaldi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 04:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Women in Red Women in Asia contest
	TanookiKoopa Thank you for your December 2020 additions! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TanookiKoopa

Thank you for creating

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 00:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing :) TanookiKoopa (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Susanna Ng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I put up this page as part of the Women in Asia contest by Women in Red. I'd appreciate the article being expanded, rather than deleted (which is what we're trying to accomplish here, aren't we?). When reading the page, it is evident why Susanna Ng is notable :)

TanookiKoopa (talk) 19:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susanna Ng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanna Ng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why would File:IfYoudOnlyBelievesample.ogg be easier? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 14:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find out how to link it so that the subtitles come up when you play the audio file. Don't really care about the file name, just want to link the subtitles :)

TanookiKoopa (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt subtitles can be shown for audio files as there is no video to display them on. But if you do create them, they could be found at TimedText:If You'dOnlyBelievesample.ogg.en.srt I think. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 00:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try that! TanookiKoopa (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded wrong cover. I'll let the image be automatically deleted on June 20. Thanks bot :)

TanookiKoopa (talk) 21:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Very nice on Ritch Esra! Perhaps you'd also like to do Richard Wellerstein? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:39, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Doell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Doell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Doell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mottezen (talk) 02:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh well, here we go again.

TanookiKoopa (talk) 21:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Wikimedia Sound Logo project

Wikimedia Sound Logo project
Hello, the Wikimedia sound logo project is in an early development phase -- this stage is for asking all kinds of questions, developing and fielding ideas, finding themes and shaping the direction of the project. Here is a link to the meta page for the project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Sound_Logo Your input is welcome. Thank you.

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Lasley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robin Seymour.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ritch Esra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ritch Esra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritch Esra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 16:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Lasley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Powers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5 September 2022

Hello. You have a new message at Spintendo's talk page.  Spintendo  05:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Arlook, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Do It Again and A Mouthful of Air.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Assistance with request edit proposals for article about actor Jamie Costa

Hi. I see you’re a member of the WikiProject Actors. I made a number of proposals to update the article about the actor Jamie Costa posted here Talk: Jamie Costa#Proposals for December 2022. I’m unable to do the edits since I have a personal connection to Costa. Could you possibly take a look at these edit suggestions? Thank you! EdwardPS19 (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm taking a look. Back to you on your talk page. TanookiKoopa (talk) 15:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Back to you on the page's talk page* TanookiKoopa (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Song recordings arranged by Paul Buckmaster has been nominated for deletion

Category:Song recordings arranged by Paul Buckmaster has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop antagonizing me

I literally don't know what I did to you, but can you please stop antagonizing me in every talk page and edit summary you leave. "I hope PizzaKing13 doesn't revert this one too.", really? I'm here trying my best to maintain these articles and I don't appreciate your antagonization as me and your publishing of Public Service Announcements on talk pages warning people of me "admitting" (why word it like that, is that a bad thing?) that I support Bukele. It's frankly rude at this point. Please stop, thanks. This is the last time I am commenting on this matter. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 19:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is you who reverts my edits.

TanookiKoopa (talk) 13:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]