User talk:Tehw1k1

• Wikipedia:Merge
  , for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
• Wikipedia directory
  is also quite useful.
• Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
• Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Play nice with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you
• image copyright tags
  .

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page  :)

Joe I 05:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tehw1k1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Baldi Olier, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: article asserts importance. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 14:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that's cool. I think I had the phrasing in the template itself in mind which says "credibly indicate" rather than the actual A7 criteria. Tehw1k1 (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi your Taxon authority templates taggings have come up for deletion, but it turns out that most are in use, by Cyclamen species articles. If you know what to do in the articles you are welcome to fix and then ask me to delete. eg template:L. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:35, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had a feeling there was something useful about them that I didn't understand, and I noticed the formulas that were in the edit space but not the page itself. I noticed all the templates because there were a bunch of them in the new page patrol backlog. I'm not sure why they didnt get patrolled since they are useful, but anyway no harm done. I'll stick to more familiar subjects and leave the scientifical stuff for the experts. Tehw1k1 (talk) 16:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Nitpick, I know, but

Thank you for your help in removing the vandalism on the Generation X page. I appreciate your efforts. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tehw1ki,

I appreciate your comments concerning the biography for Armondo LInus Acosta and need your help to make sure the contribution is correct and not violating any copyright legalities.

1. The Wikipedia biography is the original work posted on the internet.

2. The IMDB biography was posted afterwards.

3. At the beginning of August we noticed that two small paragraphs at the end of Mr Acosta's biography were deleted (perhaps inadvertently) by yourself and we don't understand why that happened. Please note, we re-entered those paragraphs, which included information on 'The Academy of Film and The Arts' and Mr. Acosta attendance at the Roger Corman Academy Award dinner in November 2009.

4. We recently updated Mr Acosta's projects (you will see that at the end of the biography).

5. Although the IMDB biography is similar to the original Wikipedia entry, we thought there were enough differences and updates to the Wikipedia page that a reader could differentiate between the two.

6. Finally - what do we need to do to make sure this biography is correct, not in any violation, have that 'banner' removed and make the biography secure.

With much appreciate for your help and contribution

Best Wishes,

(Piccolo23) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Piccolo23 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom of choice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom of choice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

SPECIFICO talk 19:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Template:Advergames has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 00:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of console game franchises is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of console game franchises until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pool Party (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pool Party (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuicoleJR (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]