User talk:Telaviv1

I would like to remind you that forced line breaks (using <br /> tags) are not supposed to be used in the middle of prose in an article. -- tariqabjotu 18:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put this on WikiProject Council/Proposals and thought you might like to join. Sahmsidea 05:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TelAviv1, you recently edited the page Israel and the United Nations. I invite you to have a look at my rewrite of this subject, Israel, Palestine and the United Nations. I intend to replace the first with the second. Let me know what you think. Emmanuelm 14:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this template should be removed from Israel because it does not link to the article. -- tariqabjotu 14:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I see it does link to Israel in the template's header. I think I have another solution. -- tariqabjotu 14:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I meant my comments only to address the probable outcome of the Israel article being considered for featured status, but clearly I ought to have let the metaphor go before I did. Tegwarrior 15:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the intro posted in Talk was a temporary backup waiting for things to be added, as I invited. When looking on to countries with ancient pasts, such as Japan and Greece, a good part of history is devoted to it. I dont want the history of Israel to be so mixed up with the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. I am working on editing an intro. Would you be willing to help and make suggestions? --Shamir1 23:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is considered vandalism. --TRFA 15:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your hard work and contributions in helping Israel earn featured article status. --Jdcaust 16:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A

please look at my latest contribution maybe you'll find an interst in discussions I am having. Zeq 20:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

WP:Reliable Source! I will say this, that my father fought on the right side in WW2, and brought back vivid memories of Palestine, and I had a wonderful time in both Israel and contiguous areas for several months as a young man, everywhere from Gaza city to the Golan, from the Sinai to Jerusalem. Shalom uv'rakhah/salaam. Best regards Nishidani 10:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on

• Our apologies if you were intending to expand this article but you made an inauspicious start with two serious mistakes: the title should be name surname and you do not copy & paste the infobox: you transclude it thus: {{State of Israel}}. -- RHaworth 17:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen your comment on another user_talk page. For drafts, you use user:Telaviv1/sandbox (or any other title that starts "user:Telaviv1/"). -- RHaworth 18:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While your improvements to the article are greatly appreciated, if you could help find some sources, that would be great; the history section (and the entire article for that matter) needs to be completely sourced if it is ever going to make it to

According to Finkelstein the consensus among serious historians is that there was an ethnic cleansing. --JaapBoBo 13:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are calling jewishvrituallibrary an unreliable source, however it just gives the text of an Arab League declaration and there is no reason to assume that it is not reliable. So please stop reverting. --JaapBoBo 14:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its a misleading statement as the paritition granted the palestinians self-dtermination. the article is not about the Palestinians but about Israel. If you want to discuss it raise it on the talk page first. Telaviv1 14:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty good with research. Can you be specific in what you are looking for or wondering about? --Shamir1 04:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply on the History of Israel page is spot on, as the Brits say. It should framed.--Gilabrand (talk) 14:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I am looking the army compositions of the forces that assaulted (and defended) Latrun during the 6 assaults of 1948.
I have them for Bin Nun A but not for the others.
Would you have them (with referenes).
I guess, maybe wrongly that you have the book of David Tal about the War of 1948. I think it could be there...
Thank you, Ceedjee (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please put accurate texts (back) in the article: [[1]] --JaapBoBo (talk) 12:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to doubt the figures given by Tal. He gives a period for his figures whle the figures you cite don't say to which period they refer. Perhaps you could check your sources to see where they get their figures from? that is what sources they cite? This might help see how reliable they are.

A lot of Palestinian fighters were peasants and I doubt that anyone really knows how many of them were involved, while Jewish forces were clearly growing all the time as they inducted people and immigrants arrived. i think it makes sense to inform the reader that these figures are not reliable and that different opinions exist.

Telaviv1 (talk) 13:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets talk about it on the articles talk page. --JaapBoBo (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you add this ref?

Do you have a link to the text, or a book in which it was published. In this way the ref is a bit unsatisfying.

Thx, --JaapBoBo (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thx --JaapBoBo (talk) 16:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been making some inappropriate edits to a number of articles, and I have reverted them. Instead of acting in good faith by attempting to dialog and raise consensus on the talk page, you have instead engaged in edit warring by re-insterting the disputed content (at least at Anti-Zionism). I ask you now to please stop. It is more than fine to make bold edits, but if you get reverted, the right and proper thing to do is to go to the talk page and make your proposal there. It is never ok to re-insert your controversial content, if an editor in good faith has reverted you. Please take this under consideration in the future, and try to work with the community, instead of fighting and edit warring. Thanks for your consideration.-Andrew c ^[talk] 16:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tel Aviv,

I'd appreciate if you could add references to sources to your edits. It's not that I doubt your edits, on the contrary, they look like they are from reliable sources. So why not mention them? Thx, --JaapBoBo (talk) 20:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't feed the troll. Don't try to reason with him, he seems incapable of that. No matter what you write, he'll either ignore it, or turn it around so that he's right and you're wrong, regardless of the facts. Ignoring him isn't much of a choice either, since he'll just open more and more rants, until the talk page is 300 gigabytes long. I suggest you help prevent him from adding more of his rants. okedem (talk) 17:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this really concerns you, be aware that there are actual anti'Semites actively editing Wikipedia, e.g. this example Slrubenstein | Talk 02:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• [Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zionist attitudes toward the Palestinian Arabs] Ceedjee (talk) 13:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• That sounds a little bit not neutral - the didn't vote to that even if that was a goal of Zionism. What is your reasonning ? Ceedjee (talk) 13:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zeq (talk) 19:27, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, will you be at the Techshoret conference in Jerusalem this Thursday? (28/2) I'll be there. John Hyams (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you help me finding materials about Jewish cultural autonomosy in Estonia before the Soviet and Nazi occupation? Im looking for the book or article about Jews honouring the Republic of Estonia in the terms of allowing on the state level and by the state order a cultural automoasy for the Estonian-Jews. I cant remember the books name - it was created before the foundation of the modern Israeli State. Said thanks to Estonia for allowing such autonomosy etc. Karabinier (talk) 20:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for warning you. It was not my intention. I am also using a shared (public) computer, so you never know what might happen next! Littleteddy (roar!) 11:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad, I just realised who did it - I forgot to log out from the public computer and somebody (in the internet cafe I used) came and vandalised with my account :( It won't happen again. Littleteddy (roar!) 13:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Yeah, your 15 minutes of fame! Littleteddy (roar!) 14:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telaviv1,

Your last two edit (here and here) to Hamas#Antisemitism were of rather poor quality (see correction here). Please check your spelling and the sources carefully before adding or modifying content on a subject which seems to elicit quite a controversy.

Cheers and kind regards, pedro gonnet - talk - 19.03.2008 13:47

Not quite, you added that it was an interview in February when, in fact, it was a commentary/editorial in January... But it's fixed now :) Cheers, pedro gonnet - talk - 19.03.2008 13:56

Hi! I need your help. Could you translate the article about Haganah, please? I've seen that it's an important article on the Hebrew Wikipedia but I don't speak this language. If you wanna translate any article onto Spanish, please, tell it to me. --Jeneme (talk) 18:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re the assassination of

BrandonYusufToropov has again raised the issue of the appropriateness of noting Muslims who support for Zionism in the Zionism article. As you have commented on this issue before, I am notifying you of this, in case you wish to follow the new discussion, which you can find here. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am a relatively new user and I just reverted a title change by Strongbrow, but I think i made a mess with the page history. Could you help me fix it? Thanks. Tkalisky (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please use edit summaries when you make changes to an article.

Your recent changes to New antisemitism would be a lot easier to follow if you explained your rationale in edit summaries. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Identifying examples of "new antisemitism" without citing

It doesn't matter whether it seems obvious that this or that is an example of "new antisemitism", without a reliable source that clearly identifies it as such the article cannot mention it as an example.

If you have questions about specific examples or sources, please discuss them on the Talk page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 15:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I'm not related to or associated with Malik Zulu Shabazz of the so-called New Black Panther Party, except that we both chose our names in honor of El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 15:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telaviv1,

I saw your recent edits on

Cheers and thanks, pedrito - talk - 03.07.2008 12:47

Hi Telaviv1

Thanks for fixing the link! As for the

WP:NOTABLE

...

Also, is there any special reason for making the word "Culture" boldfaced?

Cheers, pedrito - talk - 03.07.2008 14:28

Telaviv1, your welcome but I must tell you that I am giving serious consideration to nominating the article for deletion again, or at the very least merge it as a subsection with

I saw your comments regarding Ehud Barak on the article, and you are of course quite right. You might want ot have a look at Dalal Mughrabi, where an even more unlikey claim is made - that Barak not only participated, but shot her dead body. The source for that claim is an article that also claims 70 people were killed, that Israel's parliamnet is in Tel Aviv and other simialr nonsense. Canadian Monkey (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to get some citations up on that addition if it is going to survive. --Snowded TALK 18:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_1391

75.172.10.146 (talk) 18:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!
I wanted to know if u have an account in the

My last edit to the article talk page crossed with your post on my talk page. As you might guess from my comment, I am anti-nationalist and think one of the biggest disasters of the last two centuries is the left's belief that certain nationalisms are progressive. Palestinian nationalism being a current vogue, but support for ZANU in the 70s which has created oen of the two biggest murderer's among African dictators of today, excuse making for Saddam and the Kuwait invasion are other relativey recent examples of why nationalism isn't progressive.--

in the RZ article you added the passage "The group is reported to have been highly antisemitic", based on a reference from Karmon's book Coalitions Between Terrorist Organizations. The book is not available online, and I'm wondering if you could provide a quote from the book that would back up the assertion? --Soman (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tried sending you an email earlier. My copy has come through to me yet, so I'm tryign to work out whether I really sent it. THanks --

Although tonight might not be the most sober of nights to note this, I believe that our mutual 'bumpings into' may have developed some level of mutual recognition, if not acceptance; at this point in my Wiki-ishness, I consider this a positive development, compared to other things that are happening here and in the real world. It will take some time for me to digest the depth and content of this edit (and at #history,elsewhere) before I comment/edit.

I should note that I look upon the world in a very broad different light. I see the world situation (and our editing part in it) in terms of Mother Nature (my professional bias and likely the primary impetus for religion), God (as that might be differently defined and recognized), survival of the fittest (scientific non-God Darwin, my professional learning), humane survival of all (human rights), and the fact (like it or not) that shit happens. For me, these truths/impressions should be recognized and considered with a typically American acceptance that many different pieces are required to make the puzzle complete, neutrally; I believe that a reasonable definition of this would be "Live and let live" (which I feel is considerably more American than currently indicated on the dab page).

Based on that, I can say with impunity that, "Life is a sexually transmitted, fatal disease." It is neither incorrect nor inaccurate, yet it misses several important steps along the way between the truth expressed and a factual expression of those truths.

With that said, I look forward to our future collaboration. Regards, CasualObserver'48 (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telaviv1, I'm sure that your edits are in good faith, but to begin the article on anti-Zionism in its first section with contemporary debates about a relationship with antisemitism, before any overview of the topic whatsoever, seems an extremely odd way to write an article. Certainly I've seen articles that start with a history of the topic, along with articles that begin with an overview, but I'm hard pressed to think of any that would, or do, start with a discussion of one type of contemporary debate. Can you explain this? It seems you've also replaced it, even removing the overview paragraph, without any comment. Mackan79 (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Long time no speak :) I'm John Hyams from Techshoret. The

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2008%E2%80%932009_Israel%E2%80%93Gaza_conflict#Privacy.2Frespect_of_the_dead

Thanks a lot John Hyams (talk) 09:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have contributed to this page in the past, I thought you might be interested in the edits now being introduced by somebody or other from Kabul.--Gilabrand (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for the message. I do not have the personal experience as you, since I live in Scotland rather than Israel, but I do teach about politics/international relations, including the middle east. My first impressions were than the article was an interesting read, though there are many claims that require references. Cheers for now Fishiehelper2 (talk) 14:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was hard to separate the various edits. I would note that "See also"s do not belong in ledes. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just as Mose of Kabul's edits were too biased in one direction, yours were too biased in the other. For example, not all the Jews were expelled, and the article is about the exodus from Arab lands, not from Muslim countries. Your edits were also poorly formatted and referenced. I've re-added the best of the material, and cleaned up the references for you. Jayjg ^(talk) 06:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have done no reasearh and are ignorant as to the topics disussed here, You have made no contribtion to this page.? On the contrary, I'm the person who has been adding reliably sourced, properly written material to that mess. See this, for example, where I add significant detail and 17 citations to the article. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to get in touch regards your last revision of the above article since I'm not sure whether there is unanimous consensus that Klein's mother was Jewish. According to Klein's own research she was not Jewish but had been imprisoned in Ravensbruck for Rassenschande.

--Rbudegb (talk) 08:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for getting back - it's the weekend too here in London, so no worries. Regards Klein's mother's ethnicity, I've put some sources forward on the article's talk page. Let me know what you think. Regards,--Rbudegb (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(P. S.: I know this is a bit much, but I wanted to make the point that the Rz, contrary to german Wikip (and then en Wikip) did not just explode on the scene from nowhere.) I have not found much serious stuff on the net about the early rz. But I am now even more convicted, that this group at that time was basically a Frankfurt-only affair.

Rz different in style from the Raf? Rz' s founders were not at all that different in outlook and livestyle and experiences from raf people like Holger Meins and Jan Carl Raspe. Raspe had been in the Berlin Kommune 2 and his Diplomarbeit in education (actually quiet good, sadly enough) was published with Frankfurt maoist publishers Roter Stern Verlag, not yet called Stroemfeld ("field of streaming energy"), still a very non Hölderlin-facsimile publishing thing. (Even later on Weather manifesto Prairie Fire will be published there)

One of Red Star's steady sellers was a maoist journal in communist education, "Erziehung and Kommunikation", around which a militant group seems to have established itself at the heart of publishers. The name of these people is not well known, at least not well published, and I really don't know how many of those MLers (if any) will later opt for the urban guerilla lifestyle. (But it is also clear that even very early Rz was not just the 4 known names. There will also have been contacts to Berlin and other places. PP Zahl?).

Back to firmer ground and the rz proper: My main sources here are H- J Klein and then Werner Olles, ex-german sds, also from Frankfurt, who says he was with early rz guys in the "Red Panthers" group, (but publishes now in a very rightwing and perhaps not that serious journal).

Anyway, what it boils down to is: The early Rz was in a thing called Frankfurt Black Panthers Solidarity Group, and esp. in its follow-up group Red Panthers, who had the same Cleaveresk "lumpenproletariat -strategie" as pre-raf raf. Most of early RZ also worked at the Roter Stern Verlag. This enterprise was founded by KD Wolff, SDS student protest leader,after a time at then also half maoist März Verlag. Wolff was for some time to come a fanatical Kim IL Sung worshiper. To say it bluntly: it looks now as if the Rz were for a while the armed wing of KD Wolff's enterprise.

The early Black Panthers solidarity group was very popular with many people from different groups on the broader left (it was the time of Angela Davis). It said it helped black-power and BPP soldiers from the US army HQ nearby, it said it collected money for the poor BPP prisoners in fascist KKK land (which means Eldridge's private purse): collected moneys were fueled into Cleaver's Algiers cartheft enterprise. The BP Solidarity Committee published 4 small things with Roter Stern publishers. (A bit later a book with loose sheets, educational material on "Amerikka" to be taught by radical teachers at gymnasiums everywhere in the Federal Republic was also brought forth at Roter Stern).

Böse (long on the scene, BPP solidarity group) was put on the Roter Stern payrole. Pro forma photographer for Roter Stern, but really used for underground work with passports etc. was Weinrich' s soon to be girlfriend ....(later long time common-law wife of Carlos). Brigitte Kuhlmann

(who will die at Entebbe) had also been with the Red Panthers.

Böse was already well known in Frankfurt for his more-extreme-than-thou and outspoken attitude (as far as I know he was then not denounced by "the scene"). On this "scene" Böse and H-J Klein openly advocated the (to many radical leftists) off-putting execution of June2nd traitor Ulrich Schmücker.

Böse (says Klein, but Böse was then already dead) later told Klein, he had fetched the arab Munich September massacre terrorists from the airport to Munich (this is in Klein's autobiography, rororo aktuell).

There were many people in Black Panthers Solidarity (and in Angela David support), some happily boasting about it on tv chatshows, and many more on the "scene". Only a tiny part of which went on to put up the gun. The marxist and militant

Could I ask you to discuss your reversion of my edits to Holocaust denial on the Talk:Holocaust denial page, please? These were not done "quietly", as you suggest in your edit summary. I advised on the Talk page ahead of time what I was going to do, I included a descriptive edit summary with each change describing briefly why I was removing them, and I listed each removal on the talk page with a more detailed explanation. Can we discuss this? - Eron^Talk 20:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the way you put it in now is probably the best. There are other sources which give some comparable figures in a time period of about + or - 100 years, though usually lower (basically 50% to 70%). Personally, my guess though is that all the sources are probably being Eurocentric about this and what they mean when they say 80% of World's Jews is 80% of Europe's Jews.

A long overdue reply to your nice February note awaits you on my talk page. Please forgive the delay. Hertz1888 (talk) 02:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my addition is directly from the source. if you have sources to add that further explain the situation, please add them. however, don't continue to remove sourced information in a section that specifically says it needs expanding.

in addition, there is a section on the talk page to discuss this - please reply there.

also, those links you have added to antisemitism are not relevant to that section. Criticism of Zionism is not equal to antisemitism, and it is undue and misleading to include all those links implying that they are the same thing. untwirl(talk) 14:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Jonathan. Upon looking back in the edit history I see that the major deletion you made in this article two days ago has been restored, deleted, and restored again (the latest by me, as initially I saw no explanation for it). You may wish to redo this edit, along with giving a more elaborate justification. Hertz1888 (talk) 18:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked indefinitely the account,

Talk 20:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Following up my comments at your arb request, I trust this is an end of the matter. I'm disappointed that you still think I'm prejudiced (if you do), because my reaction to those comments of yours on Talk:Self-hating Jew should have made my feelings on that subject quite clear.

talk) 21:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Telaviv1, recently you posted your phone number, for your personal protection that information will be removed. If you feel it is necessary you can email your number to whomever you choose, but I would suggest you do not. Best Regards, Unomi (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you thought my comments were patronizing. I didn't intend them to be.

I understand why you're upset about the unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry and other comments. If you feel that Rd232/Disembrangler should be reprimanded or punished for her/his conduct, you should complain at

In the interests of moving things forward, it might be helpful to delete or archive the "Rd232 false accusations" section on that page, since clearly this is over and it distracts from the ongoing issue about the article. Also, I haven't actually apologised for the

talk) 19:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I've deleted the section for reasons noted above. If you think it needs to be archived instead, feel free to undelete and archive.

talk) 19:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Telaviv1. A recent Arbitration request in which you were named as a party, "telaviv1: "trial" resulting from sockpuppetryaccusation", has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. You can review the reasons why the Arbitrators felt this case was not appropriate for arbitration at the archived version here; most probably, the declination would have been because the dispute appeared to be primarily a content issue only or because there was not enough effort to address this problem through other forms of dispute resolution prior to the filing of the request. If this issue is still in need of resolution, please consider pursuing other forms of dispute resolution (such as a request for comment or informal or formal mediation). Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me or another clerk.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Israel lobby in the United States. Thank you. Nsaum75 (talk) 08:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

For your information: I am preparing an Arbitration Committee case against you for disruptive editing. Zero^talk 11:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In

I like to ask a favor from you. On German Wikipedia the early 70s Lod massacre perpetrated by three Japnese Red Army cadre is said to have happened rather spontanenously. My random lecture on the JRA says no way, but I need a serious source, so far the best I can do is an interview with a hard-core arab-JRA film-director. Would you know of anything more presentable? But if you think it really was a completely illogical act (measured against the logic of the PFLP, who loved the idea of non-arab terrorists or the logic of a small JRA then fresh in exile in Palestine) or if the general idea in Israel is, that it was such an act, please say so.--Radh (talk) 18:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, ĩt is very appreciated. I am just reading a Sept., 9 and following dates 2007 Neojaponism interview with Patricia Steinhoff on the whole JRA mess and also on the Lod attack, in this interview she comes on very pro-JRA, which is a bit strange, she may have been under the influence of the autobiography of the former Arab-JRA leader, Shinegobu. She calls the attack a non-suicide attack, which goes against all my convictions. [2].

Just read that the lawyer for the Lod guy Okamoto was in the Entebbe plane and talked to Böse! It is a small world. Found in a book by Oliver Schröm on Carlos (google-books, but in German).

Just finished by notes for the history of the JRA, a subject which I know next to nothing about. But I learned something about Japanese terrorism, I guess: 1.) When the newly formed United Japanese Red Army, not much more than 20 people all in all from two different groups met and started training in the winter of 1971/'72, the result of this merger was 12 dead, murdered by their comrades in orgies of selfcriticism. 2.) the hard-core of the group of the Red Army that went to Lebanon in the early 1970s, the ones that were not sympathisers, film-makers and so on, but real terrorists numbered not more than 6 or 7 people. 3 of those went on the suicidal Lod mission. The female leader of this Arab-JRA group, who planned the Lod attack had lost her best friend in the 1971/'72 massacre and was to loose a boy-friend at the airport. All the most radical Japanese militants from '69 and all the terrorists were from elite universities or at least from good technical schools, Bis bald, Ralf.--Radh (talk) 23:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated

• [3] - Good point indeed. Thanks for pointing it, I'll correct the Portuguese version accordingly.--Darwinius (talk) 23:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment "resmoving changes that show lack of sympathy to subject and jewish readers" is not acceptable. Please read

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to use edit summaries. I don't know why you made your edits and they don't seem an improvement, so I've reverted them. Maybe you need to discuss them on the talk page if they are meant to make some sort of point.

Hi, in this edit you removed referenced material. Why? This was already in the bullshit section of the article so there is no reason to do this - unless the references were in fact not supporting the statements in the text or completely made up. But as I know Ostrovsky I would be surprised to learn he did not make these claims. Richiez (talk) 00:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Yad Vashem references to Afrika Korps are broken links and therefore unverifiable. Please restore appropriate url links for verfiability. AshLin (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for

Thanks for your response to this on my talk page; that article from The Independent definitely puts The Daily Mail's article into a proper historical perspective. Sorry for causing the ensuing mini-edit war! Wingman4l7 (talk) 01:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In History of Israel, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Rafi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please self-revert. Thanks. --Frederico1234 (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I speak English. Telaviv1 (talk) 16:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1 revert per day is the limit. Please revert. --Frederico1234 (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its not a rule its a voluntary code. Why don't you explain what you are objecting to? Telaviv1 (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is a rule. Please see

WP:ARBPIA#General_1RR_restriction. --Frederico1234 (talk) 17:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The page you refer to is out of date and it is not clear by what authority the assertion was made. Nor was any notice given. I corrected the section in line with your comment. So I reject your assertion. Telaviv1 (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The authority behind

WP:AE. --Frederico1234 (talk) 21:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Which case are you referring to? Telaviv1 (talk) 21:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding? This rule is enforced severely and many people have been blocked for breaking it. Zero^talk 22:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all what was removed and added have no connection to the conflict(becouse chessdovi is banned from the topic area) secound there is no arbpia notice on the page so we must assume

WP:AGF--Shrike (talk) 22:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Do you guys all read my comments page? Telaviv1 (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it. There is now a notice on the talk page, so you must not exceed 1RR. It's not a voluntary code, and I think I should add that I calling ordinary edits vandalism is not a good idea(and certainly caught my attention), and if you revert anything that is not vandalism according to

talk) 15:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I know he was born a Jew, but he was baptized. If you know of any RS's on the topic can you post them here? Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 16:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just noticed that you are active in Israeli-related pages. If you speak Hebrew perhaps you can translate these names into Hebrew: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Ossetia01-he.png PANONIAN 15:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mamluk Sultanate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to thank you for your work on the Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses article! I think you've really strengthened it in terms of citations and historical context. In the future, it would be great if you could add markup to your references; it is best to avoid bare URLs if possible. Cheers! Wingman4l7 (talk) 02:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't strange that the only tiny developed democratic country in the Middle East (the only place where Arabs are truly free) is the only one that has an entire

As RHaworth recently admitted, this article must be userfied, but not removed. Greetings.--JellWaffle (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telaviv1. You have new messages at Gwickwire's talk page.
Message added 21:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

gwickwire | Leave a message 21:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of this--Sonntagsbraten (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telaviv1. I see you tried to nominate yourself for adminship with this edit. I reverted the edit as malformed: there are specific procedures you need to follow to nominate yourself for adminship. Candidates for adminship require a significant amount of experience and trust from the community - it might be worth reading this essay. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 14:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me with this? I don't know who are the current Head of the Government Deputies.--Michael Zeev (talk) 03:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note that since you don't seem to want to give these, don't be surprised if I or others simply revert you. You've been asked to provide them several times and not just by me.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Liam Burrows (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Swing, James Morrison, The Morning Show and The Circle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A

]

File:Heinz Bernard 1970.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 01:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Reference errors on 7 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the History of Israel page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 00:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

History of Israel

Hi. What you wrote is very interesting, but you need at least one reliable source to back it up. Where did you read it?--Averysoda (talk) 11:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Zionism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalinin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Zionism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karaite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Wikipedia Editor Retention Project )

Editor

Editor of the Week

:

I nominate User Telaviv1 to be Editor of the Week for being a fair-minded and quality editor for many years. With 80% article-space editing among his 6000 edits, his ability to edit fairly on articles with often contentious subject matters due to real world global politics is commendable. His main interest is the article History of Israel. He has edited with an understanding of mutual editorial recognition and the collaboration of equals. He was willing to discuss contentious material which was constantly at issue. His own statement, "(my) edits are made in good faith and are not out of a desire to sell political points." is a clear indication of his awareness that Wikipedians, when working together, can create quality content together, even across disputed boundaries.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Telaviv1

Star of David

Editor of the Week for the week beginning August 16, 2015

Understands mutual editorial collaboration of equals. Discusses contentious material with fairness and good faith.

Recognized for

Wikipedians working together

Notable work(s)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! . Buster Seven Talk 15:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Thanks for all your article work!

talk) 17:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Congratulations. Well deserved. God bless, Go Phightins! 18:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

WP:ARBPIA3 is now open and evidence can be submitted until September 8. 62.90.5.221 (talk) 09:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Your edit at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3

Hi, I've reverted your edit at

ping in reply) 11:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Book of Kings. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week : nominations needed!

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Israel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ===Persian and Hellenistic rule (538 BCE - 135 BCE ===
• history_9.html Jerusalem in the Crusader Period] Jerusalem: Life throughout the ages in a holy city] David Eisenstadt, March 1997</ref> The [[Pogroms of 1096|murder of Jews]] began as the Crusaders

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

talk) 15:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spartacus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McCarthy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maki. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:06, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Telaviv1. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week seeking nominations (and a new facilitator)

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Telaviv1. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elisha Medical Center

Hello Mister Telaviv1, recently I have written an article about a hospital in Israel: the Elisha Medical Center, but now they want to erase this article because they say it's "promotional" and "not encyclopedic", what can I do?, I honestly think that this article has interest and deserves to be in the english wikipedia, I dont have an agenda nor I dont try to promote a bussiness or something, I just think that the article is good enough to be in wikipedia, I read that you are in the so-called "Israel project", and that's why I have wrote to you this message, I'm also interested about Israel, and also write articles in Spanish and Catalan sometimes, I'm from Spain. Greetings man :-) ChandraHelsinky (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "inconvenient picture" by another POV warrior

Why? Because Amin al-Husseini was the most important Palestinian leader. That's why the picture is there. Could you please restore it?--Gyanfranco44 (talk) 04:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Telaviv1. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tag date changes

What is up with that? You failed to respond to my objection. Can you explain? Also, sources need to accompany additions — we are not mind readers. Thanks. El_C 14:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean by tag dates. As I can see from the previous comment, you were very hasty in changing the section and your reversal does not seem to be based on familiarity with the subject. Not sure why you call yourself "we". I am just me. I am the author who originally entered the Persian conquest in this article. I think it is both very interesting and relevant to modern affairs. I am still learning about the subject. I have a job and childern and so am pressed for time. My apologies if my changes does not meet your high standards. I am open to suggestions for improvement.

You changed the tag from July to Oct., for no apparent reason. It is at the top of the page. By we I mean both myself and the

Wikipedia policy. Other editors have no way to tell whether you're going to be adding sources or not. One way to instill patience on that regard is to employ the {{In use}} template, so that would be my suggestion to you. El_C 15:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, please always sign and date your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end. Thanks again. El_C 15:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Nomination of

Antisemitic boycotts

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Antisemitic boycotts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antisemitic boycotts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ImTheIP (talk) 02:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 21:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings @ Telaviv1 ,

Hi, I am User:Bookku, I find information and knowledge gaps create Drafts, try to recruit draft expanding editors and promote drafts articles for further expansion.

• Draft:Turkish textbook controversies
  in the section 'Depiction of Jews and Israel'
• Draft:Civil life in conflict zones
• Draft:Criticism of Edward Said's Orientalism
• Draft:List of erstwhile slave trading townships
• Draft:Slavery in Mecca and Medina
• Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia
• Draft:Amina Dawood Al-Mufti

Requesting your visit to above drafts help expand the same if any of these interests you. Any inputs from Israel academic / language reliable sources also will be welcome.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 06:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kramer logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Kramer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New IMF report

Hey , can you please change to the new International Monetary Fund report of October in “Israel” page.

GDP PPP: 496,840 (rank 49) 

GDP PPP per capita : 52,170 (rank 29) GDP : 527,180 (rank 28)

GDP per capita:55,360 (rank 15) 

I did asked in the talk page but didn’t get an answer . Please help to update the page! Thanks Qplb191 (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Qplb191 (talk) 17:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link :https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/ISR Qplb191 (talk) 18:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMF report

Hey , can you please change to the new International Monetary Fund report of October in “Israel” page. GDP PPP: 496,840 (rank 49) GDP PPP per capita : 52,170 (rank 29) GDP : 527,180 (rank 28) GDP per capita:55,360 (rank 15) link :https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/profile/ISR Qplb191 (talk) 05:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you update it? Qplb191 (talk) 03:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladino.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]