User talk:TelusFielder

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our

Hi, sorry for the confusion. Having an article about that stadium at Diamond Park is fine. The problem is that we have to try to keep the content of the encyclopedia manageable (or at least as manageable as possible, 1.5 million articles is a lot!) and for that reason we can't accept articles about just anything. The most common problem is people creating articles about themselves, their friends, a band they've started, an organization they belong to or something like that. Obviously we do not have the resources to write and maintain a good quality article about every person with internet access. In order to enforce this, we therefore have a set of notability guidelines to weed out articles about unimportant and insignificant things.

The subject of your article, being a fairly large stadium, is probably important enough to have its own article. However, we can't just assume something is important – the article needs to explain this. Your article was only one line of text, and didn't really offer any explanation of importance. (Don't take this personally: hundreds of articles are deleted every day, it's not your fault.) A s I mentioned before, you are welcome to re-write your contribution. Providing a more detailed article will help, of course, but by far the best way to ensure it is kept is to provide

You can find information about uploading images here: Wikipedia:Uploading images. Make sure that you have clearly defined the image's copyright status, as the image will be deleted very quickly if it has no tag or the wrong tag. If you have already uploaded an image, but still can't get it linked properly in the article, leave a message on my talk page, and I will get it set up for you. Resolute 05:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a reference or, at least, name the event. --Arch26 04:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy, you still haven't addressed my previous comment.

Anyway, see the comment that I placed on NorthernFire's talk page regarding Edmonton and Ottawa. --Arch26 07:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had to step in... this is just such a stupid argument. Do you know how ridiculous it sounds to say that a place is the furthest north of any city over 712,000? So, I could say that Calgary is the furthest north of any city over 991,000? Oh wait, I think Toronto is the furthest north of any city over 2,358,987. 500,000 is a nice ROUND number. And last time I checked, 712,000 GREATER THAN 500,000... of course, I'm no math wiz. Anyway, it just sounds better and less anal retentive to say, "over 500,000" rather than over "712,000". I believe the accurate anal population is stated a number of times elsewhere in the article. --Arch26 21:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does have more than 500,000, which is why it was stated that "Edmonton is the northernmost city in North America with a population of OVER 500,000."

To demonstrate, here is a list of other cities with populations of over 500,000:

• Calgary (because 990,000 is OVER 500,000)
• Toronto (because 2.4 million is OVER 500,000)
• Montreal (because 1.5 million is OVER 500,000)
• Vancouver (because 600,000 is over 500,000)

When you look at a map, they often make a dot for cities with populations between 500,000 and 1,000,000. I have never seen a map with a dot for 712,000. Why? Because at some point, you just have to use round numbers as a bracket. Otherwise, it gets totally ridiculous. --Arch26 21:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, 700,000 would be better than 712,000, BUT I would say that population milestones are usually very round quarter numbers like 250,000, 500,000, 750,000 and 1,000,000. For smaller cities, it would be numbers like 25,000, 50,000, 75,000, and 100,000. 700,000 isn't really one of those. --Arch26 04:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the changes to

Just so you know. The three largest crowds in Grey Cup history were in Montreal, including a record 68,318 for Montreal's 41-6 win over Edmonton in 1977 and 65,255 the last time the game was at the Big O in 2001, when Calgary beat Winnipeg 27-19. They had 65,113 in 1979 for Montreal's 17-9 loss to the Eskimos. --DJSasso 15:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote: "Every single time I make a change to something, you either take it out or put it how you like it. Capital Ex is short for Capital Exhibition, the Edmonton Trappers lead all leagues in Canada in attendance except major, and Edmonton's Baseball History sounds much better than Baseball in Edmonton."

Yes I understand Capital Ex is short for Capital Exhibition, but to actually spell it out makes the flow of the article not work as well and assumes the reader needs to know that. The official name is no longer the Capital Exhibition. They changed it to Capital Ex. As far as attendance, that is fine, however, you need sources before you can make statements like that. And the reason the articles name was changed to Baseball in Edmonton, was that it fits a standard naming pattern we have for articles like this. I didn't make the change on my own it was voted on by users of Wikipedia and during the voting period which was a fairly significant period of time you could have made your thoughts known, but it was unanomously voted to change the name to match the other articles of the same type of subject for other cities.--Djsasso 15:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article

Per your email (feel free to ask on talk pages as well): Adding links as sources can be done using single square brackets, ie: [http://www.nhl.com] will show up as: [1].

Adding: [http://www.nhl.com National Hockey League] will appear as: National Hockey League.

See

They Lions averaged close to 33,000 fans last year. I don't know where you got your number from.http://www.cfl.ca/index.php?module=sked&func=view&year=2006 --J3wishVulcan 01:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of emailing please use talk pages. As for the roster structure in the Northern League. It was correct. You need to reread what was there. It said the exact same thing you wrote but in a much easier to understand way, you needlessly complicated the article. As far as the Fan 960 article goes. That morning talk show is nationally syndicated which is why it is listed there. --Djsasso 19:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Although, there is a Golden League in track and field, its typically what CBC shows for track every spring/summer on Sports Saturday. Shootmaster 44 08:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because it was a general statement about independent baseball, not the Golden League itself. Articles should remain specific to the topic. The statement, as presented, belongs on the

The article uses adherents.com as it's source for consistency. Please refrain from changing numbers which are cited. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If some of the trivia points actually mean anything to the building, they could be integrated into the article in a prose format rather than a point format - i.e., the location of the benches and how the players walk through the concourse to get to the ice surface. The statement arguing Rexall has among the best ice in the league uses a six year old article as its citation. That this statement might have been true in 2002 does not mean it remains so in 2008. I would suggest a much more recent article stating the same, if one exists. Resolute 22:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TelusFielder, relating to your edits on

If they (islamicweb.net) say they took it from the CIA factsheet, it would be best to locate and source the factsheet directly.

ITAQALLAH 23:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

A

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Reggie Rivard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

<Did not play in the Major Leagues>

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

The article Edmonton Dodgers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable team, no sources, no assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced

]

Maxim Gryaznov

The article

source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

The article

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

The article

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced

]

Nomination of

Sergey Ogureshnikov

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Ogureshnikov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shaad lko (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mikhail Lazorenko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject has not met notability standards of

WP:GNG. Xajaso (talk) 21:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xajaso (talk) 21:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, so I reverted your addition on Tel Aviv. I was partly incorrect in my statement though. Istanbul is mostly in Europe (I forgot that the Asian bit is part of the city, not just a suburb) and is often treated as a European city. From what I understand, the Middle East ends at the Bosporus (maybe further back) and so the situation is a bit tricky as we have a city in two regions. It doesn't really make sense to classify it as a Middle Eastern city though. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | ^{Say Shalom!} 8 Tishrei 5772 04:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telus. I did not exactly say that Art. 121(1A) supports the functioning of the Syariah Court in M'sia. I said that the dual-justice system is supported by Art. 121(1A) of the constitution. Art. 121(1A) says: "(1A) The courts referred to in Clause (1) shall have no jurisdiction in respect of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Syariah courts." U may amend my sentence if u think the sentence is confusing or inaccurate (if u can find a better section of the constitution supporting the establishment of the syariah court). ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 06:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On wikipedia, if ones edit is reverted, one is expected to instead of insisting on including their edit, to discuss in on the talkpage. This is called

Hi. When you recently edited Tatarstan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Artem Antipov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable junior hockey player. Fails

WP:NHOCKEY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Resolute 04:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced

If they are online, link to them exactly as you would a webpage - such as references 4 and 16 at Dan Bain. If they are offline but from reliable publications, cite them as you would if they were a publication. Do you have anything specific in mind? Resolute 21:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Nail Yakupov? In this case, I think this is something you should bring to the talk page. You're both edit warring over the content, so as an admin, I'd be required to warn both, and block the next one to continue it, whether it be you or they. The best solution here is to ask at the talk page for advice on whether the material in question is appropriate. If consensus agrees with your position and they continue trying to remove, we can deal with them. Cheers, Resolute 13:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who you think you are, threatening to warn someone if they keep reverting your "contributions" that were moved asked to be moved to the bottom long before you starting reverting some chivalrous anonymous user's correct edits. --99.255.146.18 (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Asra Nomani. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:TelusFielder / 68.150.245.177. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tinton5 (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DMacks (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article your are referencing does indeed cite honor based violence, but not murders by ethnic Swedish families, therefore it's irrelevant in the

I suppose that you are referring to this section in the article:

In another case cited in the report, a Swedish woman who became pregnant with her partner of Middle Eastern origin was beaten by her family. "They told her they would 'rip the Arab out of her belly' among other threats," Sabuni said. "These are examples of honour crimes in ethnic Swedish families, even though the term 'honour crime' is usually reserved to people of non-Swedish origin."

Nobody died and nobody was charged with murder. Why do you think it should be included in an article about murders based on honor/shame? As it stands, it's irrelevant to the subject of that article. So I tagged it with "Dubious" for now.

Hi, an anonymous user deleted this section and you reverted that delete instead of starting a discussion on the

talk) 06:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I thought I'd stop in and extend an olive branch. It's easy to see editors deleting material, as I am, as villains in a conspiracy to cover up human rights abuses. But really my concern is perspective. If things are bad, we should say they are bad. If things are ok, we should say they're ok. Let me give you an example. I was reading a story about London. Apparently a couple of Muslim men had commented on a woman's clothes, telling her she was dressed too promiscuously and should cover up. Do you know what the headline was? "MODESTY POLICE FORM IN LONDON!" There are many problems in London, as there are everywhere, but the existence of "Modesty police" is not one of them. It is the same here. While some Swedes may have beaten a pregnant woman, it is not enough for us to say "SWEDES LEARN HONOR KILLING FROM MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS". A single event does not indicate a pattern. Murder and assaults happen all the time in countries with millions of people. It is bad journalism to project the motivations of one person or one small group of people onto an entire population. So I'm not protecting anyone or hiding anything. I am merely skeptical. My proposal for you to find more/better sources is a sincere one. If you can find those sources, I will even add the material to the article myself. PraetorianFury (talk) 20:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Fordham is an highly ranked acredited research university. If you dispute its neutrality make a complaint in
  WP:RSN
  .
• Here you replaced a published book with an apologetic website, please don't do it again.--Kathovo talk 10:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, TelusFielder. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TelusFielder. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nikolai Safonov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails

WP:NHOCKEY

. The World Championship only qualifies for notability at senior level and in the top pool, junior level does not qualify.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tay87 (talk) 10:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brunei Research Department (International) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brunei Research Department (International) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Azuru79 (talk) 10:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SELEX Galileo (Saudi Arabia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SELEX Galileo (Saudi Arabia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sgubaldo (talk) 13:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]