User talk:Telxon04

Please do not undo my edit of the Days of our Lives page. The "O" in "our" in the title IS NOT intended to be capitalized and has never been at anytime in the show's history. This is because the show's creator, Ted Corday intended the title to represent the days of the tv viewers lives not just the characters featured on the show. So using the lower case "o" in "our" is totally correct. This has been debated numerous times on Wikipedia in the past, but has always been reverted to the lower case "o". Although it appears to be a grammatical error (one that has gone unnoticed for nearly 50 years, as the unaware editors of it must assume) it in fact is correct when used in the title of this show. Again, you will not find the "o" in "our" capitalized by any legitimate reference to the show. Due to this fact, it is incorrect to capitalize it on Wikipedia as that would change the meaning of the title.

The article

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Thank you for your interest on the All My Children article. Unfortunately, I had to revert you edit because it wasn't backed with any sources. You're welcome to add it back with a reliable reference. In the mean time, I have corrected the previous version of the article to specify that the decline of ratings is specifically in regard to the Nielsen ratings and not necessarily for All My Children altogether.

Regards Farine (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Days of Our Lives, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Farine (talk) 04:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use an anonymous IP address disrupt Wikipedia's policy as you did with this edit. Just because you don't like something on an article, that's no excuse to remove it, especially when it is backed with sources. If you are going to an delete a sourced paragraph from an article, you must always provide an edit summary.

You've been editing long enough on Wikipedia to know what the policies are. And your constant disregard unresponsiveness to the notices you are receiving demonstrates your unwillingness to collaborate. So consider this as your final warning before this account as well as your anonymous IP address both get blocked from editing Wikipedia. Farine (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parson's until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telxon04. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Stephen Anthony Salyers II, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Stephen Anthony Salyers II to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TKK ^{bark !} 11:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telxon04. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Could you PLEASE provide a source for the edits your are providing on Sublimity City. The edits tyhat are there are being removed as they are unsourced close paraphrasing...,Coal town guy (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add my voice: please provide sources. If you're having trouble, we can help you format references. The New Deal "experimental community" angle is interesting and encyclopedia-worthy, but it should be well-sourced. You might consider a sandbox draft first. In the meantime, I'll see what I can turn up. Acroterion (talk) 02:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vicki Lawrence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |The Family]]'' sketches she originated the character of [[Thelma Harper|Thelma Harper/Mama]], (the elderly [[supporting character]] who was series star ''[[Carol Burnett's]]'' character ''[[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vicki Lawrence

added links pointing to The Family, Eunice and Joe Hamilton

Thelma Harper

added links pointing to Southern and Eunice

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julie Reeves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTCR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telxon04. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Huntington, West Virginia

added links pointing to Huntington, Army Corps of Engineers and MSA

Thomas Carroll House

added a link pointing to Guyandotte

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kilgore, Kentucky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Telxon04. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kilgore, Kentucky, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Telxon04. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Hello, Telxon04. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kentucky Route 1134 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telxon04! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telxon04. It has been over six months since you last edited the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peterman Hill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peterman Hill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm _Talk 05:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Neal, Kentucky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, cannot find any evidence this town existed with a basic search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 18:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]