User talk:TheCatLife

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Nathan Obral that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of The CW affiliates (table). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JBL (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarity's sake, the reason why I did what I did was because I felt it was redundant overkill, but if it is the established format, then that's good enough for me. Vjmlhds (talk) 13:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits violate

WP:OWN, trying to reshape the DTV tables into your own instead of the universal design squarely fall into that category! TheCatLife (talk) 15:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Wasn't trying to "own" anything, just trying something different. But as I said, what's there is the established format, I'll respect it and leave it as is. No need to start accusing people of things. Vjmlhds (talk) 17:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KDKA-TV itself made the announcement and it was properly sourced. Get off your high horse, it's been made official. Nothing speculative at this point. Jgera5 (talk) 08:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lemonaka. I noticed that you recently removed content from KSBI without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -Lemonaka‎ 04:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Esolo5002 (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:TheImmortalKitten per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheImmortalKitten. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 11:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]