User talk:The Interior/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Bow River

Hi The Interior. First off, cool to see you in person the other day in class! Second, thanks for helping out with the Bow River article. It is very much appreciated. Our articles must be completed by the night of April 10th (the article still is not in its final form), and I have a quick question. I was thinking about deleting the "Ecology" and "Conservation and development" sections of the Bow River article. "Ecology" doesn't have much information about the Bow's ecology and it doesn't really contribute to the article. It's just one sentence that says "citation needed". "Conservation and development" seems redundant, given what Rkfire and I have added. I think I could add all the minor details in it to other sections, perhaps with the exception of the sentence reading "The Bow Valley Provincial Park was established in the Bow Valley and is a part of the Kananaskis Country park system." Do you have any advice about whether or not I should proceed in doing this? I think it would clean up the article overall. Do you think the Wikipedia community would appreciate this potentially minor loss of information for the sake of "cleanliness"?--Dejlambert (talk) 05:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey Djlambert. Definitely trim any overlap or redundancy. However, I'd avoid removing the ecology section because that's an area where the article could use expansion. Having an undeveloped section for it encourages other editors to expand, whereas with no heading, it may not occur to people that there is still room for improvement there. Great work by all on this page, I may even work on the ecology section myself and maybe nominate the article for Good status. The Interior (Talk) 20:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice! I'll be sure to leave the Ecology section.--Dejlambert (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

HIST 396

Hi The Interior, Many, many thanks for all of your help with HIST 396. It was great to chat this week, and good to see that Cronon piece. SockeyeSam (talk) 03:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Ditto: and we have a date for eating crickets: Friday April 13. What could be more fitting? Can you make it @ 12PM? Will confirm the place in a day or two. --Greentina (talk) 03:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Works for me. I've got my last exam that morning, so don't judge me if I have a midday cocktail with my crickets. The Interior (Talk) 04:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Can you make it at 1130 @ Rangoli (they don't take reservations - we all need to be there in order to be seated, and I was told 1130 was a good time to arrive). --Greentina (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Will be there @ 11:30. The Interior (Talk) 18:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi The Interior, thanks very much for your input on our Trail Smelter article, especially moving the photo which of course made more sense, and your edits and comments along the way. We were wondering if you could help us with regard to putting a request for article creation out there. We think that one of the smelter's legacies was the damage done to Lake Roosevelt, but there is a lot of debate about how the pollution got into that lake. We have mentioned it as a legacy in our article but think that it deserves more attention than we can give within the scope of our assignment, especially since we were meant to be historical and these allegations are more recent. thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Sliver9754 (talk) 06:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I'll leave a note on the Talk page, but I agree that the 2004 content should be on the lake article, and just mentioned, maybe as a "see also" on the smelter dispute page. By going into detail about other, more modern controversies, we run the risk of the article becoming a criticism page for COMINCO. The Interior (Talk) 18:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

good point. I have actually found recent writing arguing that the smelter can't be responsible for all of this since lakes closer to trail are not so polluted, so I would like to add stuff like that, however these are scientific journals so i am not sure how to decipher all that language, or whether research like that is what we are meant to use on wikipedia anyways. I would like to give Cominco the benefit of the doubt since it is difficult to prove unequivocally where all the pollution came from. thanks for your input. Sliver9754 (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RfA. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

OMG it was my pleasure, I'm sure you'll do fine. The Interior (Talk) 18:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Introduction citations

Hello, The Interior. You have new messages at Eye101's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hell's Gate move

Soooooo, now what?--Eye101 (talk) 02:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

... now we wait for an industrious admin to drop by, analyze our arguments, and if they are logical to the admin, and he/she doesn't find some obscure reason it can't be moved, Hells Gate it is. 7 days on Wikipedia can easily mean two or three weeks. The Interior (Talk) 18:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Ha, I guess that makes sense; we get what we pay for ;) --Eye101 (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for helping Team Bison with the article! Chaereankim (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Aww, shucks. Thanks! The Interior (Talk) 18:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the promotion for OA, much appreciated! I really want to help with some courses in the future. InverseHypercube (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

No problem, I knew you'd be good addition to the OA corps and was actually about to ask you to apply! The Interior (Talk) 22:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kurt Vonnegut Memorial Library