User talk:The Story of Marjaan

Hi The Story of Marjaan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khyber Pass, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Islamabad. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Idell (talk) 09:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of spiritual entities in Islam, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of spiritual entities in Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Bilal ibn Rabah. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Story of Marjaan! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
  non-free content criteria
  in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, you wanted me to talk to your if I disagree. Well, I disagree. First, this is a list and a Wikipedia list should be like a list. The type of list we are doing here is most likely Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Glossaries. These usually list items from A-Z. Now, as far as I understood your point of view, we should only add the entities mentioned in the Quran. This was originally my idea too, because I already suspected this going to some disputes. However, most people think we should keep the list. Now my reasons, why I think we should use this version: 1) There aren't enough creautres in the Quran. We only have these:

• Angels (with a vast list of beigns already mentioned in the Angels in Islam article, jinn, ifrit (arguably not even an entity by itself but merely an epiphet in the Quran. Marid doesn't appear, since this is just an epiphet in the Quran, devils (arguably only "evil jinn" as many contemporary scholars argue), the Qarin (not even an entity by itself in the Quranic context), Houris and Iblis.

2) Quran isn't a good source: The nature of spirits in the Quran is ambiguos. Best example is Iblis. He might be, in Islam (including literature, poems, Muslim believes, reports from the Sahaba, Hadiths etc.) an angel, a jinn, a devil, or entirely unique. Yes, you could say "But the Quran clearly says he is one of the jinn, so all other opinions must be false". You could, but this isn't convincing, since you only understand the Quran as such, because of exegesis. "Jinn" could also be a general term for any spiritual entity. Actually, there are view points arguing that "jinn" do not exist at all, thus we could even dispute adding "jinn" as a seperate class of being (many Modernists hold this view, but this view also appears in erlier works like whose of Ghazali). So what is it? Is "jinn" just meaning "invisible" and including all sorts of invisible beigns or is it a creature on its own? We don't know, the Quran doesn't clarify, interpretation does. 3) Unclear boundaries: How do you decide that belongs to Islam and what does not?: You could arguy, "but the div are Persian", but these scholars likewise attribute them to Muhammad and we don't have any source directly going back to Muhammad, only oral traditions. The Muslims might have called them "marid" instead of "divs", the concept would nevertheless root in "Islam". How about Sakhr? Doesn't occure in contemporary theology, does this mean "he does not belong to Islam"? Sarcely not, since this refers to an entity mentiooned in the Quran, tradition just gave this entity a name. How about Khidr? Contemporary scholarship, partly even deriving from (by the way rather unqualified) scholars like Sayyid Qutb who reject this as "unislamic", would argue "this is middle Eastern tradition, not Islam". Nevetheless, a majority of Muslims genuinly identify the "mysterious man" in Surah 18 with Khidr. How do you evne want to draw the line? By the Quran, those depiction of spiritual creatures is unclear? The hadiths, with not as profound but similar issues? How do you classify Miraj Literature? Is this "jewish" and considered "Israeliyyat"? Probably not. For example the devils I added derive from Muslim sources, although not made explicit, same goes for angels like Ridwan (who exist just because of interpretation and Miraj Literature) and they also found their way partly to Turkish Wiki. Islam has no clerical hierarchy like Catholicism, so we just don't have a clear definition of Islamic supernatural creatures (this is also why I decided to write the genus behind the entity, in case of ambiguity, you can just add another one. For example Iblis (angel, Genie, Devil) instead of adding Iblis to multiple categories. Much better to read this way). Thus, there might always be an entity not accepted by someone else but believed to exist or at least play an role within the Muslim's belief-system. Establishing boundaries about what is "Islamic" and what is "falsly classified as Islamic" is always a subjective point of view. But this violates Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. If you have a fair solution, I am willing to follow your suggestions, (my first decission was to avoid this conflict by just deleting the article so this inconsistence between different point of views within Islam would not be made evident) but if there is merely your personal point of view about what "Islam" is, I must, unfortunately, insist to make sure we have a neutral point of view here, adding every point of view, which includes every entity deriving from Muslim sources. Best regards--VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just so you are aware, I have just declined your edit request on Talk:List of programs broadcast by Hum TV. Please feel free to reopen the edit request if you make it more clear what you would like an editor to do for you. Thanks! --Ferien (talk) 21:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Badnaseeb cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Any reviews or reception of the work?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badnaseeb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Badnaseeb, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 19:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Story of Marjaan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rActalk to me 19:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ryan Kaji child star.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   Di-replaceable fair use disputed
   |<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Story of Marjaan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

The Story of Marjaan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I make effective edits on Wikipedia. I don't make bad ones. The Story of Marjaan (talk) 19:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no block on this account. If you are unable to edit, please tell the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit. 331dot (talk) 22:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you create Nasta'liq images for many languages, can you tell me what software you used? Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Faisalabad skyline.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 10:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Badshah Begum Original Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Badshah Begum Original Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]