User talk:Theavengerssalacia

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There is already a section on this in her article -- see Elizabeth_II#Issue

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Theavengerssalacia/sandbox/Descendants of The Elizabeth II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Theavengerssalacia/sandbox/Descendants of The Elizabeth II, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theavengerssalacia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My article is the detailed version on the descendants of Elizabeth II

Hi Theavengerssalacia! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My page keeps being declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Theavengerssalacia. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday Theavengerssalacia (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ Theavengerssalacia (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theavengerssalacia! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Meghan, Duchess of Sussex that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Irene Flaugher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mccapra (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bill Stevenson(Ex-Husband of Jill Biden) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Quite simply fails the

WP:GNG

test. No significant coverage about him and not just him as the former husband of a famous person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 02:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theavengerssalacia

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JML1148, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JML1148}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 03:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't there a page for her Theavengerssalacia (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at S/2015 (136472) 1. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nrco0e (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]