User talk:Therealbey

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Istihad Ahmed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Therealbey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSS ^💬 17:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can I know the reason why you deleted Emre bey page sir ? Therealbey (talk) 17:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article was redirected because

WP:NACTOR requires a significant role in multiple notable productions for a standalone article. GSS ^💬 17:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

oh ok I see. I was just adding those but you deleted. Now should I add them ? Therealbey (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of removing the redirect, I would suggest creating a new article in the draft namespace and submitting it for review once ready. Please refer to

WP:AfC. Thank you. GSS ^💬

Hi Therealbey! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. GSS ^💬 03:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emre Bey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you kindly point me where should I edit like the carrier part ? And the source are reliable also they are accepted by Wikipedia Turkish

Emre Bey Therealbey (talk) 12:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to be a case of

WP:NYA

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emre Bey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 06:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Mayor of Golapganj. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mayor of Golapganj, you may be blocked from editing. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attempting to avoid the dispute over the article title. Using incorrect

CSD tags is disruptive. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

there was no reason to change it from "Mayor of Golapganj" to "Mayor of Golapganj municipality" coz people know it as "mayor of Golapganj" instead of Golapganj municipality.also "Mayor of Golapganj" would be more effective for Google search. Therealbey (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has rules about

article talk page in this section. Please stop trying to move the page. Once a move discussion is started, the page needs to stay where it is until an uninvolved editor closes the discussion and determines consensus. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

okay, then why Sylhet City Corporation has its mayor page by Mayor of Sylhet why not Mayor of Sylhet City Corporation ? He is not the mayor of whole sylhet. same in other City Corporation. Pourashavas are also almost same .I followed the same way nothing from own. Therealbey (talk) 03:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should post what you just said on the article talk page,

here. Consistency in article titles is important, and you should say that in the discussion. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Once again, please stop messing with templates, as you did here or I will start a discussion regarding your conduct at

Help me . I want know you tell me to do it now you are giving me final warning. Please listen to me, am I right that this article should be move to Mayor of Golapganj cuz all other municipal corporation are article are made same or what? Therealbey (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Therealbey. I started a discussion on the article talk page. Other editors may comment in that discussion. There are rules for the discussions. One rule is that only one discussion can happen at a time. Another rule is that the discussion will usually stay open for at least 7 days. Then, another editor will determine if the article should stay or be moved. Please be patient. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chairman of Golapganj, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andh bhakt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andh bhakt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a