User talk:Too Cool
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
The above is a welcome, nothing more
All I was doing was merely a welcome and links to help you be successful here. Don't forget to make edit summaries with your edits as well. Best, Kukini 07:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
WP:NUH
See
Speedy and prod tags on your userpage
I removed these because they were causing your userpage to be listed as a candidate for deletion. NawlinWiki 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- okay, dude, keep up the good work!!! --Too Cool 08:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
UPWA
umm sorry but i didnt create that article!!!! i dont even know wat promotion that is!?? --- Paulley 07:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- lol get the administator who deleted the article to find its edit history if you dont believe me but i didnt create that article ---- Paulley
Protection tag
Please do not put {{
]- oh, im sorry i didnt know an article had to BE protected to put that tag on, i thought that to REQUEST an article to BE protected we had to put that tag on!!! so, tell me how do i get an article to get protected? we need one on the Boxing article its being vandalised almost each and every day. --Too Cool 08:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me. For requesting protection, go to ]
Your recent edits
This is in regards to your edits on the
Don't edit others' comments
Don't edit others' comments (or delete them, for that matter). That is called unacceptable behavior and will get you blocked. Thanks. --Geniac 13:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- The following qoute has been extracted from Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines
- The purpose of a Wikipedia talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page.
- and i would like to point out that im NOT an article, thank you!!!
- a person does indeed have the right to delete messages on his OWN talk page please see -
- Wikipedia:Talk_page#Etiquette
- it says- Most users treat their user talk pages like regular talk pages, and archive the contents periodically to a personal subpage — either when the page gets too large, on a regular schedule, or when they take a wikivacation. Others delete comments after they have responded to them.
- and i have indeed responded to them, three times, already!!!
- and please do NOT try to threaten me!!! --Too Cool 13:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- "i have indeed responded to them, three times, already!!!"
- Do you mean here? Could you provide links to the other two replies, please?]
"please do NOT try to threaten me!!!" I apologise if you thought I was threatening you; I did not intend to come across that way. --Geniac 14:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- and isnt this kinda STUPID asking why, to show the OTHER two reoplies, especially when they were underneath each other!!! --Too Cool 14:28, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
AMA
Hi, I'm going to be your advocate.
- Hi again, your interpretation of Wikipedia guidance in regard to user talk pages is substantially correct, however regarding the current debate, could I suggest you discontinue. Addhoc 17:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)]
- Hi, thanks anyways, whatever!!! --Too Cool 06:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The notable anime article
I was going to suggest the deletion of that article anyway because there was no way to determine what should be on that list (usually any sort of "List of notable _____" is deleted). Also, you shouldn't remove tags from articles without addressing the issue. Oh, and don't put a "credits" section on articles or their talk pages- see
- Despite your best intentions, as a community we decided that the list of anime wasn't doing anything different from the category- it was simply growing infinitely and indiscriminately. Have you seen the deletion discussion? --Wafulz 13:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- You're working under the assumption that the only reason it was deleted was because it was too long- this is incorrect. It was deleted because it was not maintainable, it was an indiscriminate list of information, and because it wasn't doing anything that Category:Anime wasn't already doing.
- Check out these policies/guidelines:
Redirect on my talk page
Don't throw in redirects on my talk page. This is
- HEY, HEY, hey it was an ACCIDENT, i wanted to press my signature button on top, but accidently pressed the redirect button, theyre almsot next to each. I NEVER VADALISE, thank you!!! and DIDNT i tell you i dont wanna talk about anime for a while. HEY, dont think were friends just cuz we had a little chat for two minutes!!! --Too Cool 14:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, nevermind. Thought I don't how this had anything to do with anime. Also, please be a little more polite in discussions- there's no need to be patronizing. --Wafulz 14:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)]
- Alright, nevermind. Thought I don't how this had anything to do with anime. Also, please be a little more
K-1 World Grand Prix 2002
You should provide the necessary context for this article to keep it from getting deleted. Also, lists are created using * (for plain lists) or # (for numbered lists) at the beginning of the line. ~ trialsanderrors 07:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Preview
I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the
Blocked
Do not use sock-puppets to avoid your problematic editing history. You have clearly continued the same innapropriate activities that got you blocked in the first place. Keep it up and your primary account will simply be banned permanently. You can run, but you can't hide. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 16:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
{unblock reviewed|so, youve blocked me! but do you have practically any good reason for blocking me? and you say you might ban me permanently, but exactly when would my current ban be lifted anyway? You have banned me for no good reason, this is ridiculous. And you say im using sock puppets, well this is what wikipedia's article says about sock-puppets- A sock puppet is an additional username used by a Wikipedian who edits under more than one name, and i am absolutley not using more than one account, i am under new connection, i got new internet connection, pc, service, etc, so you cant just ban me for that. You are being absolutley unjust banning me for no good reason, you ought to lift my ban.|decline=You have misread the policy on sockpuppets. Please reread the entire policy, specifically about not using sockpuppets abusively and not using them to circumvent blocks. Thanks for your contributions in the past and goodbye from Wikipedia. --
Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Jeffrey O. Gustafson for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Transperent sockpuppet of decidedly problematic and previously blocked User:T00C00L Your IP address is 203.76.96.12.
{unblock|so, am i just being banned for a sock puppet? and you guys are sayin im using this account to circumvent block of my previous account, well, my previous account was never permanently banned, it was only banned for like five days. ive done lots and Lots of contributions here and i wanna do more, i work on wikipedia around two hours everyday, and i never try to vandalise and, when was i so objectionally rude? i personally dont see the reson i have been banned here? id get it, if there was a mistake i made i couldv been blocked for a couple of days or so, but, why have i been banned for life? is there any reason to do this, im not evn getting an explanation here. My ban has been absolutely unjust. }
I'm going to unblock you. Although
]Unblock under review. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 13:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Block affirmed and upheld. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)